How high can you hear? This 60 second tone helps you determine the highest frequencyyour ears can detect. The range of human hearing is typically quoted as being from 20-20,000Hz, but ageand prolonged exposure to loud sounds can significantly lower your ability to hear high frequencies.For best results, perform the test at a comfortable volume in a quiet environment and using good quality headphones.Feel free to add your result to the comments below, indicating your age and whether you've been exposed toloud sounds over the course of your life.
Attention! Always make sure headphones/speakers are set to a low volume to avoid damage to hearing or equipment. When the tone becomes too faint to hear, stop the test: do not increase the volume of your headphones/speakers.
40 Hertz Test Tone Download
Download File 🔥 https://shurll.com/2yGcwJ 🔥
Ameritech won't give it to me.I take care of the computer and phone systems for my company. I have
four branch offices in Ameritech territory (although I'm using a CLEC)
and one in GTE.Thanks for any help.Rich
Make it worth their while to provide you with the number...
call them up on a regular basis and request assistance for
routine maintenance: doing loss measurements on each and every
individual line, manually. When they complain, tell them it
isn't _your_ idea, it's just "company policy". If they don't
have the time in the morning, call them again that afternoon.
If they can't do it today, call them tomorrow.It won't take long before they give you the number for their
milliwatt. Ask for a quiet term number too. Ask if they have a
loop back (T108/T109) test pair too.Heh heh, be sure to say thank you in a nice tone of voice! Floyd
--
Floyd L. Davidson fl...@ptialaska.net
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
I've got two thoughts on this item:Thought #1: Since you're using a CLEC (but wait... aren't
they ALL competitive now?) Ameritech has little motivation to
give you anything! If you're not doing anything for them like
buying trunks or other services, why should they give you things?
Maybe the CLEC should install a milliwatt and tell you it's number.
That's what I think.Thought #2: Okay, you still want the Ameritech milliwatt
number. So latch onto an Ameritech technician and over a
period of time, buy him a cup of coffee, give him a company
baseball hat or a polo shirt make sure he has a chair when
he comes to visit on a repair call you cause to happen and
soon he'll be on your side. If you are competent and can
convince him you're not going to abuse his information you
can probably get it easily.What's that old saying? You can catch more files with honey
than with vinegarGood luck... Al
Thanks for the tips.I actually got the numbers I needed from a friendly telecom equipment
supplier in the area.Since my CLEC resells Ameritech services, it seems to me that the
milliwatt should come with the package.Another thing. I guess I'm naive, but I get the impression that there
are some nefarious things that can be done with this information. I got
one response from a guy who seemed to be a phone phreaker. I must be
missing something. Maybe I don't have a criminal mind.I used the signal to check the dB loss on my lines. How could that
possibly be misused?Rich
Well, about the worst thing that could happen is someone posts the
number in a newsgroup and Ameritech changes it. Your phreaker is
probably a 10 year old kid who thinks he can make free calls if he
knows that number....which is typical of wannabe phreakers.
--
Reply to Newsgroup, or find email here:
> Well, about the worst thing that could happen is someone posts the
> number in a newsgroup and Ameritech changes it. Your phreaker is
> probably a 10 year old kid who thinks he can make free calls if he
> knows that number....which is typical of wannabe phreakers.
> --
There is no standard for a dial-up milliwatt number. One large
company happens to commonly use the xxx-0020 number. Some
telco's use a 99xx number. Another common number is 1102 (the
1000 series being the base, and the test number being the last
three digits, so 1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, etc are all valid
test numbers).There are some totally off the wall random numbers used too. And
the worst case that I know of is a small switch that was once
programmed to use xxx-0C02 (which can't be dialed with a standard
telephone DTMF 3x4 pad).The idea that giving out the T102 test number will lead to abuse,
or even to excessive calls is probably just paranoia. Only very
small switches have only a single milliwatt device, and larger
switches will have many. Of course the device gets used for
more than just the dialup access too.
> There are some totally off the wall random numbers used too. And
> the worst case that I know of is a small switch that was once
> programmed to use xxx-0C02 (which can't be dialed with a standard
> telephone DTMF 3x4 pad).
Ah.. but many things can and do generate the A,B,C,D tones. It's fairly
easy to modify a standard WECO TT pad to open up the fourth column and
enable A,B,C,D using a toggle switch and the third column. Tony
Actually, this was commonly done by phreaks in the early 80's. It's known as
the silver box. Basically, people modified tonepads by adding a switch which
switched between tne third and fourth columns, so one could use the fourth
column's 1633hz tone instead of the third column's 1208?Hz tone to generate
DTMF, producing A, B, C, and D instead of 3, 6,9, and #.
The Purpose? Back in the early 80's, the Military's Autovon phone network still
existed. (It's since been replaced by Black DSN(relatively secure), and Red
DSN(Extremely secure, due to heavy duty encryption), but that's another story)
The autovon network could be controlled by A,B,C,D tones. A was called flash, B
was called flash override, C was called priority, and D was called priority
override. I believe that the A key was different than the flash we have today,
but I might be wrong. Another way this "box" was used was to setup
conversations between phreaks on switches that were 4ESS or below. One would
call an operator and blast the D tone down the line. This would cause a pulsing
dialtone, and if the caller entered either 6 or 7, they could talk to whoever
had connected via the other number, i.e. 6---7, or 7----6. This was basically
like having a loop internal to switch.
I'm almost positive that this doesn't work anymore...However, an interesting idea arises from this...If one modified a voice mail
system to recognize A, B, C, D tones, unconventional access codes could be
used, making it MUCH more difficult for mailboxes to be penetrated by outside
individuals. all a person would need to do to use this is to modify their
tonepad, or to replace it with one that has 16 keys..This way, nobody without a
modified phone would even have a chance of getting into the box. Scanning
programs could still be used, but they would have to be rewritten to support
ABCD, and the number of possible combinations would also be increased
significantly..It's certainly something to think about.
> > I don't see this as being secure at all. Modems can generate the fourth
> > column so easily that this security is worthless. And it's not
> > difficult, as you pointed out, to modify a regular phone for this.
> Granted, there are ways to generate the fourth column tones but the most
> casual hacker won't bother trying it. Even if EVERY phone had the keys,
> as the original post stated, merely having the extra keys would increase
> the number of combinations possible.
Looks like child's play for a computer to me.There is no such thing as a casual hacker.And there are such things as demon dialers and modem scripts that can
redial a number indefinitely and just keep on trying differen combos of
any number until it gets thru.So the conclusion is that the hackers are lazy, but very wiley.. With
plenty of time on their hands.A long time ago I wrote an iterative Pi generation prog. in GWBasic and
let it run on an old XT for a few weeks to see what it would do. A few
months ago I ran it on the 200 MHz Pentium I now have, and it did about
the same thing in a matter of minutes. Times have changed.. A lot..> --
> Brendan Keith
Gee, you didn't know that all phreakers got their information from the
Internet? Where have you been, in a cave? I mean, like it's all over
the news.And then some phreaker gets on DeJaNews or AltaVista and finds this
discussion, and Voila'. A light bulb lights up above his little head!
> And there are such things as demon dialers and modem scripts that can
> redial a number indefinitely and just keep on trying differen combos of
> any number until it gets thru.
> So the conclusion is that the hackers are lazy, but very wiley.. With
> plenty of time on their hands.
> A long time ago I wrote an iterative Pi generation prog. in GWBasic and
> let it run on an old XT for a few weeks to see what it would do. A few
> months ago I ran it on the 200 MHz Pentium I now have, and it did about
> the same thing in a matter of minutes. Times have changed.. A lot..
I think the point that people are missing here is the simplicity of
passwords that most people use. Most folks use their extension number,
home phone number, birthday, then spouse, kid, dog, cat etc. Tony
Adding another 4 digits will frustrate most phreaks. YES, any idiot can
download a wardialer, but I'm yet to see one that could dial ABCD tones. You'll
at least get a brief repreive while someone messes with the code in ToneLoc.No matter what though, aging passwords on a monthly or even more frequent basis
will deter phone phreaks best.
Passwords should be changed frequently because an password that doesn't change
will be cracked eventually if people keep trying. So many people are lax on
security. For instance, my school purchased a Mitel system in 1996...I found
out the default password and hacked their maintainence port, then notified them
of the security problem which was corrected by their Mitel service
representative.
And no, I DID NOT set up DISA access or screw things up. I may be a hacker, but
I'm not like that....Greivangel wrote 152ee80cbc
aw free video call and chat app download
team 7 flute ringtone download
helvetica single line font download