If you want long battery life and a simple pick for Switch listening, choose 1MORE SonoFlow Active Noise; if you need adaptive noise cancellation, quick charging, and a stated low-latency game mode for Switch, choose QCY H3. My overall pick for long sessions is the 1MORE, while the QCY makes a stronger case when gaming features matter most.
• 1MORE SonoFlow Active Noise: Its biggest strength is up to 70 hours of playback with ANC off, plus LDAC support and app-based EQ presets. Its trade-off is that the battery figure is specified with ANC off, and no gaming latency figure is provided.
• QCY H3: Its biggest strength is adaptive ANC, a stated 60-millisecond latency, and quick charging that provides five hours of playback from a 10-minute charge. Its trade-off is a shorter stated maximum playback time: 55 hours.
• Choose 1MORE if you want longer potential listening between charges and a set of preset EQ options.
• Choose QCY if adaptive noise adjustment, fast charging, or a stated game-mode latency figure matters more.
The SonoFlow is an over-ear Bluetooth headphone built around 40 mm dynamic drivers. It supports LDAC and has a stated frequency range of 20 Hz to 40 kHz. Those details make it a strong fit if you want wireless listening with high-resolution audio support and room to adjust the sound through the 1MORE MUSIC app, which offers 12 EQ presets.
For Switch use, the practical draw is long potential battery life: up to 70 hours with ANC off. It also supports active noise cancellation and transparency mode, so there are options for reducing surrounding sound or letting more of it through. A 3.5 mm audio jack and included audio cable provide a wired connection option. The listed Bluetooth version is 5, and the stated wireless range is 10 meters.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-17 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
I’d choose the 1MORE if I wanted a headphone for extended listening, travel, or games where battery life and EQ flexibility take priority. I’d skip it if a specific low-latency gaming mode or a quick-charge playback figure is essential; neither is provided in its listed specifications. The 70-hour claim also applies with ANC off, so it is not a promise of that duration with noise cancellation running.
The QCY H3 is also an over-ear Bluetooth headphone with 40 mm drivers and LDAC support. Its standout feature is adaptive ANC: the product information says it detects surrounding sound and adjusts noise reduction, with a stated reduction figure of up to 50 dB. That makes it appealing if your listening environment changes between quieter rooms and noisier commutes.
For Switch gaming, QCY gives buyers a more specific feature to weigh: game mode is described with latency as low as 0.06 seconds, or 60 milliseconds. That figure is a stated capability, not a guarantee of identical results in every setup. The H3 also lists Bluetooth 5.4, a 3.5 mm jack, and up to 55 hours of playback. Its quick-charge claim is concrete too: 10 minutes of charging is specified to provide five hours of playback.
I’d consider the QCY if I wanted adaptive noise control, a fast top-up, and a stated gaming-latency figure. Its trade-off is that its listed maximum battery life is shorter than the 1MORE’s. The supplied specifications also give a 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz frequency range and do not list the same number of app EQ presets as the SonoFlow.
• Best for longer stated playback with ANC off → 1MORE SonoFlow Active Noise. It lists up to 70 hours, compared with 55 hours for the QCY.
• Best for a stated quick-charge playback boost → QCY H3. Its 10-minute charge is specified to provide five hours of playback; the 1MORE sheet does not give a comparable playback figure for a short charge.
• Best for adaptive noise cancellation → QCY H3. Its ANC is described as adjusting to surrounding sound. The 1MORE lists ANC and transparency mode but does not specify adaptive ANC.
• Best for a stated game-mode latency figure → QCY H3. It lists latency as low as 60 milliseconds in game mode; no equivalent figure is provided for the 1MORE.
• Best for a larger selection of named EQ presets → 1MORE SonoFlow Active Noise. Its app lists 12 presets, while the QCY information here does not specify a preset count.
• Best for a stated frequency range reaching 40 kHz → 1MORE SonoFlow Active Noise. The QCY’s listed range ends at 20 kHz.
• Best for newer listed Bluetooth version → QCY H3. It specifies Bluetooth 5.4, while the 1MORE lists Bluetooth 5.
• Best for either a wired backup or wireless use → Both. Each lists Bluetooth connectivity, a 3.5 mm jack, and an included audio cable.
For Switch, I’d make the choice around how you play. Long handheld or docked sessions without frequent charging favor the 1MORE’s higher stated maximum. If you’re more concerned about sound syncing with gameplay and regularly have little time to recharge, the QCY’s listed game mode and quick-charge claim are more directly relevant. Both also offer wired listening through a 3.5 mm connection, which is a useful option to consider when choosing how to connect.
My Verdict
I would buy the 1MORE SonoFlow Active Noise for Switch if I wanted a straightforward over-ear headphone with longer stated battery life, LDAC, and 12 EQ presets. Its 70-hour figure is specifically with ANC off, so I would not treat it as the expected runtime with cancellation enabled.
I’d choose the QCY H3 instead if game-mode latency, adaptive ANC, or a 10-minute charge that provides five hours of playback mattered more to me. For my own Switch priorities, I prefer the 1MORE’s longer potential listening time and EQ choice.
The QCY is the more clearly specified gaming pick: it lists game mode with latency as low as 60 milliseconds. The 1MORE lists no comparable latency figure, though it offers a 3.5 mm connection and longer stated playback with ANC off.
Does the QCY H3 charge faster than the 1MORE SonoFlow?
The QCY specifies that a 10-minute charge can provide five hours of playback. The available 1MORE specifications do not give an equivalent short-charge playback figure, so they don’t support a direct quick-charge comparison.
No waterproof rating or ear-clip design is specified for either product. Both are described as over-ear headphones, so shoppers who need waterproof construction or an ear-clip fit should look for a model whose specifications explicitly confirm those features.
• HIFI WALKER Open Ear Earbuds vs KUUCAT H7 comparison
• LucidSound LS100X vs iKmai Hybrid Noise Cancelling
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.