Home

This is an aggregation of every ranking of the James Bonds films that I could find online. I did not stop until I had logged every list that appears in the Google search results. In the end, there were 66 of them, from newspapers, movie websites, and blogs.

A few notes: this only includes films 1 through 24, as there are few lists that have been updated, and many would say that it’s too early to know where to rank No Time to Die anyhow. This also does not include Casino Royale (1967) nor Never Say Never Again (1983), as not every list included them. I ignored any list that was simply an ordering based on Rotten Tomatoes scores, Metacritic scores, etc. Each list is the opinion of the person who wrote it, or in many cases, the combined opinions of that publication’s staff.

Directly below are the results. Below that I will do a more thorough breakdown of them. You can download the dataset yourself at the bottom.

Click the headings to change the list order.

#1 Goldfinger [Rank: 2.64, Variance: 5.99]

Goldfinger is the definitive number one. It tops the results in every category, and significantly it's also the rank with the most agreement of all (least variance). Goldfinger at #1 was the second most popular of all choices, only behind Die Another Day at #24 - A whopping 36% of lists put it at #1, and over 80% put it in the top three.

var3 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 24 36.36 36.36 2 | 16 24.24 60.61 3 | 13 19.70 80.30 4 | 4 6.06 86.36 5 | 5 7.58 93.94 6 | 2 3.03 96.97 8 | 1 1.52 98.48 18 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#2 Casino Royale [Rank: 3.82, Variance: 12.51]

The comeback film. Casino Royale has cemented it's status as a franchise favorite. In fact, it's the only film to give Goldfinger serious competition. Putting anything but one of those two seems as your top 007 film could be considered a niche choice by comparison - 58% of all top picks are one of those two films, and no other film makes up more than 10% of top spots. Royale likewise has strong degree of agreement, with the third-lowest variance of all films, and selecting it as number one was the fifth most common of all rankings.

var21 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 14 21.21 21.21 2 | 16 24.24 45.45 3 | 10 15.15 60.61 4 | 8 12.12 72.73 5 | 7 10.61 83.33 6 | 2 3.03 86.36 8 | 6 9.09 95.45 10 | 1 1.52 96.97 19 | 1 1.52 98.48 20 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#3 From Russia with Love [Rank: 4.45, Variance: 9.34]

Bond's second outing is likewise the second-most agreed upon film in the franchise, with a low, low variance of 9.34, and they were typically agreeing that it belonged at second place - putting it second was one of the most common of all ranks (tied 5th). Nearly half of all lists put the film in their top three (45%).

var2 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 5 7.58 7.58 2 | 14 21.21 28.79 3 | 11 16.67 45.45 4 | 12 18.18 63.64 5 | 4 6.06 69.70 6 | 7 10.61 80.30 7 | 7 10.61 90.91 8 | 2 3.03 93.94 9 | 1 1.52 95.45 11 | 1 1.52 96.97 15 | 1 1.52 98.48 18 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#4 Skyfall [Rank: 5.79, Variance: 17.29]

Skyfall is the lowest film in the list in which over 90% of publications rank it in the top half, with 92.4% doing so. It has above average consensus on it's placing. Both the largest plurality and the median ranking of the film is 5th place.

var23 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 6 9.09 9.09 2 | 7 10.61 19.70 3 | 9 13.64 33.33 4 | 6 9.09 42.42 5 | 10 15.15 57.58 6 | 8 12.12 69.70 7 | 4 6.06 75.76 8 | 5 7.58 83.33 9 | 3 4.55 87.88 10 | 1 1.52 89.39 11 | 1 1.52 90.91 12 | 1 1.52 92.42 13 | 1 1.52 93.94 16 | 1 1.52 95.45 17 | 1 1.52 96.97 18 | 1 1.52 98.48 21 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#5 On Her Majesty's Secret Service [Rank: 7.09, Variance: 28.29]

In stark contrast to the four previous films, OHMSS is one of the most divisive of all Bond films, with the third-highest variance. While it doesn't have the highest variance, it's very much the most love-it-or-hate-it film in the series - it's the highest-ranking film to have someone rank it dead last.

var6 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 6 9.09 9.09 2 | 6 9.09 18.18 3 | 7 10.61 28.79 4 | 4 6.06 34.85 5 | 5 7.58 42.42 6 | 8 12.12 54.55 7 | 10 15.15 69.70 8 | 4 6.06 75.76 9 | 1 1.52 77.27 10 | 3 4.55 81.82 11 | 1 1.52 83.33 12 | 1 1.52 84.85 14 | 1 1.52 86.36 15 | 3 4.55 90.91 16 | 2 3.03 93.94 17 | 1 1.52 95.45 20 | 1 1.52 96.97 24 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#6 The Spy Who Loved Me [Rank: 7.92, Variance: 18.10]

By far the most unanimously praised film of the Moore era, The Spy Who Loved Me has far fewer first place rankings than the five previous films, but gives a consistent showing in the top quarter of 007 films.

var10 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 1 1.52 1.52 2 | 2 3.03 4.55 3 | 5 7.58 12.12 4 | 8 12.12 24.24 5 | 6 9.09 33.33 6 | 6 9.09 42.42 7 | 8 12.12 54.55 8 | 5 7.58 62.12 9 | 4 6.06 68.18 10 | 5 7.58 75.76 11 | 4 6.06 81.82 12 | 4 6.06 87.88 13 | 1 1.52 89.39 14 | 2 3.03 92.42 16 | 1 1.52 93.94 17 | 2 3.03 96.97 20 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#7 GoldenEye [Rank: 8.12, Variance: 16.26]

Only narrowly beat out by the previous entry, GoldenEye is fittingly the final gold-standard film of the series. From here on out, praise is significantly less consistent, and with significantly less consensus. The average and median ranking of the film is 8th, and the most common choice overall is 7th.

var17 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 2 3.03 3.03 2 | 3 4.55 7.58 3 | 2 3.03 10.61 4 | 3 4.55 15.15 5 | 9 13.64 28.79 6 | 3 4.55 33.33 7 | 10 15.15 48.48 8 | 8 12.12 60.61 9 | 5 7.58 68.18 10 | 8 12.12 80.30 11 | 2 3.03 83.33 12 | 2 3.03 86.36 13 | 2 3.03 89.39 14 | 1 1.52 90.91 15 | 1 1.52 92.42 16 | 1 1.52 93.94 17 | 1 1.52 95.45 18 | 3 4.55 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#8 Dr. No [Rank: 8.44, Variance: 17.82]

Dr. No is the highest-ranking film to not have a single publication rank it in the top spot. It stands to reason that it faces great respect from fans, but little unbridled adulation. There is above-average consensus that it falls somewhere around 8th place.

var1 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 3 | 3 4.55 4.55 4 | 9 13.64 18.18 5 | 6 9.09 27.27 6 | 9 13.64 40.91 7 | 5 7.58 48.48 8 | 8 12.12 60.61 9 | 6 9.09 69.70 10 | 2 3.03 72.73 11 | 4 6.06 78.79 12 | 1 1.52 80.30 13 | 6 9.09 89.39 14 | 2 3.03 92.42 16 | 2 3.03 95.45 19 | 1 1.52 96.97 21 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#9 Thunderball [Rank: 10.65, Variance: 26.53]

Thunderball is the most contentious of the Connery films by a wide margin. As opposed to OHMSS's love-it-or-hate-it status, it would be more accurate to describe Thunderball as love-it-or-think-it's-quite-mediocre.

var4 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 1 1.52 1.52 2 | 1 1.52 3.03 4 | 2 3.03 6.06 5 | 5 7.58 13.64 6 | 7 10.61 24.24 7 | 6 9.09 33.33 8 | 3 4.55 37.88 9 | 8 12.12 50.00 10 | 4 6.06 56.06 11 | 5 7.58 63.64 12 | 4 6.06 69.70 13 | 3 4.55 74.24 15 | 5 7.58 81.82 16 | 2 3.03 84.85 17 | 2 3.03 87.88 18 | 1 1.52 89.39 19 | 2 3.03 92.42 20 | 1 1.52 93.94 21 | 2 3.03 96.97 22 | 1 1.52 98.48 24 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#10 You Only Live Twice [Rank: 11.74, Variance: 21.71]

Rounding out the top 10 is the only Lewis Gilbert directed film of the Connery era, and there is below-average consensus that it belongs there. For most it falls somewhere in the middle - over half of publications put it in the middle quarter of films, though it's not without it's loyalists.

var5 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 2 3.03 3.03 3 | 2 3.03 6.06 4 | 1 1.52 7.58 5 | 1 1.52 9.09 6 | 2 3.03 12.12 7 | 2 3.03 15.15 8 | 3 4.55 19.70 9 | 7 10.61 30.30 10 | 3 4.55 34.85 11 | 6 9.09 43.94 12 | 10 15.15 59.09 13 | 9 13.64 72.73 14 | 4 6.06 78.79 15 | 3 4.55 83.33 16 | 2 3.03 86.36 17 | 1 1.52 87.88 18 | 1 1.52 89.39 19 | 2 3.03 92.42 20 | 1 1.52 93.94 21 | 2 3.03 96.97 22 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#11 The Living Daylights [Rank: 12.53, Variance: 21.86]

The two Timothy Dalton entries fall shocking close to one another, with The Living Daylights just barely edging out the victory over it's sequel.

var15 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 3 | 1 1.52 1.52 4 | 1 1.52 3.03 5 | 1 1.52 4.55 6 | 2 3.03 7.58 7 | 2 3.03 10.61 8 | 6 9.09 19.70 9 | 4 6.06 25.76 10 | 4 6.06 31.82 11 | 7 10.61 42.42 12 | 12 18.18 60.61 13 | 3 4.55 65.15 14 | 7 10.61 75.76 15 | 1 1.52 77.27 16 | 3 4.55 81.82 17 | 1 1.52 83.33 18 | 2 3.03 86.36 19 | 3 4.55 90.91 20 | 2 3.03 93.94 23 | 2 3.03 96.97 24 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#12 Licence to Kill [Rank: 12.58, Variance: 23.24]

While Licence to Kill is ranked lower overall than it's immediate predecessor, it should be noted that it has double the number of people that rank it in their top 5, and half as many that rank it in their bottom 3, a trend which is wrought out in it's higher variance.

var16 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 3 | 1 1.52 1.52 4 | 4 6.06 7.58 5 | 1 1.52 9.09 6 | 1 1.52 10.61 7 | 1 1.52 12.12 8 | 2 3.03 15.15 9 | 5 7.58 22.73 10 | 8 12.12 34.85 11 | 9 13.64 48.48 12 | 3 4.55 53.03 13 | 6 9.09 62.12 14 | 3 4.55 66.67 15 | 4 6.06 72.73 16 | 4 6.06 78.79 17 | 6 9.09 87.88 18 | 1 1.52 89.39 20 | 1 1.52 90.91 21 | 1 1.52 92.42 22 | 3 4.55 96.97 23 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#13 For Your Eyes Only [Rank: 13.05, Variance: 20.53]

For Your Eyes Only is often derided as the most middling, milquetoast 007 film, and that's certainly reflected in the data. Nearly 70% of publications rank it between 9th and 16th, and virtually no one puts it in any of the superlative slots - good or bad.

var12 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 1 1.52 1.52 2 | 1 1.52 3.03 5 | 1 1.52 4.55 7 | 3 4.55 9.09 8 | 1 1.52 10.61 9 | 9 13.64 24.24 10 | 3 4.55 28.79 11 | 5 7.58 36.36 12 | 7 10.61 46.97 13 | 7 10.61 57.58 14 | 5 7.58 65.15 15 | 5 7.58 72.73 16 | 4 6.06 78.79 17 | 1 1.52 80.30 18 | 3 4.55 84.85 19 | 3 4.55 89.39 20 | 2 3.03 92.42 21 | 4 6.06 98.48 22 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#14 Live and Let Die [Rank: 13.58, Variance: 29.70]

While Live and Let Die might seem to inspire less visceral disagreement among fans than a film like OHMSS, it's actually a more contentious film (perhaps the slide whistle is contributing), with the second-highest variance in the whole series. For the most part, the rankings are strewn all over the map, but a 15% plurality of publications put it at 14th, which is also it's average rank, it's median, and where it ended up on the final list.

var8 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 1 1.52 1.52 3 | 1 1.52 3.03 4 | 1 1.52 4.55 5 | 1 1.52 6.06 6 | 3 4.55 10.61 7 | 2 3.03 13.64 8 | 3 4.55 18.18 9 | 4 6.06 24.24 10 | 5 7.58 31.82 11 | 4 6.06 37.88 12 | 1 1.52 39.39 13 | 4 6.06 45.45 14 | 10 15.15 60.61 15 | 6 9.09 69.70 16 | 2 3.03 72.73 17 | 1 1.52 74.24 18 | 3 4.55 78.79 19 | 2 3.03 81.82 20 | 3 4.55 86.36 21 | 2 3.03 89.39 22 | 2 3.03 92.42 23 | 4 6.06 98.48 24 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#15 Spectre [Rank: 15.53, Variance: 31.40]

Here it is. The latest film included in this survey is also the most contentious by a fair margin. Spectre is the lowest film in this list to have a publication rank it in the top spot - and it doesn't have just one, it has three, which is more than any other film above it until you get to the top 5. There really is no agreement at all (an equal three rank it dead last), and given it's the most recent film included, it is strong evidence that 007 fans need time to evaluate where exactly a film stands.

var24 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 3 4.55 4.55 4 | 2 3.03 7.58 6 | 2 3.03 10.61 8 | 2 3.03 13.64 10 | 1 1.52 15.15 11 | 3 4.55 19.70 12 | 2 3.03 22.73 13 | 2 3.03 25.76 14 | 5 7.58 33.33 15 | 3 4.55 37.88 16 | 7 10.61 48.48 17 | 8 12.12 60.61 18 | 6 9.09 69.70 19 | 5 7.58 77.27 20 | 4 6.06 83.33 21 | 2 3.03 86.36 22 | 5 7.58 93.94 23 | 1 1.52 95.45 24 | 3 4.55 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#16 Tomorrow Never Dies [Rank: 15.56, Variance: 21.64]

While it does find a little love, 70% of publications rank Tomorrow Never Dies in the bottom half, and a strong plurality of nearly 20% put it in 21st place.

var18 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 4 | 1 1.52 1.52 7 | 1 1.52 3.03 8 | 2 3.03 6.06 9 | 2 3.03 9.09 10 | 4 6.06 15.15 11 | 4 6.06 21.21 12 | 6 9.09 30.30 13 | 5 7.58 37.88 14 | 4 6.06 43.94 15 | 5 7.58 51.52 16 | 5 7.58 59.09 17 | 1 1.52 60.61 18 | 5 7.58 68.18 19 | 1 1.52 69.70 20 | 3 4.55 74.24 21 | 12 18.18 92.42 22 | 3 4.55 96.97 23 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#17 Moonraker [Rank: 16.67, Variance: 23.37]

Many Bond fans claim to have a soft spot for Moonraker, but even those couldn't find it in themselves to rank it highly - zero publications place it in the top 6, which is a marked jump from the films we've seen so far. In addition, a plurality of nearly 20% place it in dead last, meaning it's standing in the franchise is quite lopsided, with it's supporters feebly offering praise, while it's detractors dismantle it with an robotic fist.

var11 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 7 | 1 1.52 1.52 9 | 2 3.03 4.55 10 | 6 9.09 13.64 11 | 1 1.52 15.15 12 | 1 1.52 16.67 13 | 4 6.06 22.73 14 | 2 3.03 25.76 15 | 4 6.06 31.82 16 | 6 9.09 40.91 17 | 4 6.06 46.97 18 | 4 6.06 53.03 19 | 3 4.55 57.58 20 | 6 9.09 66.67 21 | 5 7.58 74.24 22 | 3 4.55 78.79 23 | 2 3.03 81.82 24 | 12 18.18 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#18 The Man with the Golden Gun [Rank: 16.95, Variance: 24.07]

Just trailing Moonraker is another Moore outing, The Man with the Golden Gun. While many defend Christopher Lee's Scaramanga as one of the best villains in the entire series, the film on the whole inspires far less endorsement, with over 80% of publications ranking the film in the bottom half.

var9 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 5 | 1 1.52 1.52 6 | 1 1.52 3.03 7 | 2 3.03 6.06 8 | 1 1.52 7.58 9 | 1 1.52 9.09 10 | 4 6.06 15.15 11 | 1 1.52 16.67 12 | 2 3.03 19.70 13 | 1 1.52 21.21 14 | 2 3.03 24.24 15 | 7 10.61 34.85 16 | 2 3.03 37.88 17 | 10 15.15 53.03 18 | 4 6.06 59.09 19 | 4 6.06 65.15 20 | 4 6.06 71.21 21 | 4 6.06 77.27 22 | 6 9.09 86.36 23 | 6 9.09 95.45 24 | 3 4.55 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

[TIE] #19 Octopussy [Rank: 17.73, Variance: 19.71]

In the only instance in the entire survey, Octopussy and The World is Not Enough tie exactly at an average rank of 17.7272727272, and essentially break even across the other metrics.

var13 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 7 | 1 1.52 1.52 8 | 1 1.52 3.03 9 | 1 1.52 4.55 10 | 2 3.03 7.58 11 | 2 3.03 10.61 12 | 4 6.06 16.67 13 | 3 4.55 21.21 14 | 1 1.52 22.73 15 | 5 7.58 30.30 16 | 7 10.61 40.91 17 | 3 4.55 45.45 18 | 1 1.52 46.97 19 | 5 7.58 54.55 20 | 5 7.58 62.12 21 | 9 13.64 75.76 22 | 8 12.12 87.88 23 | 5 7.58 95.45 24 | 3 4.55 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

[TIE] #19 The World is Not Enough [Rank: 17.73, Variance: 22.20]

While it's true that The World is Not Enough is a more contentious film than Octopussy, with a higher variance, it also has a large plurality of over 21% that place it in 19th place, which is precisely where it landed on the overall list.

var19 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 5 | 3 4.55 4.55 6 | 1 1.52 6.06 9 | 2 3.03 9.09 10 | 1 1.52 10.61 11 | 3 4.55 15.15 13 | 1 1.52 16.67 15 | 3 4.55 21.21 16 | 3 4.55 25.76 17 | 5 7.58 33.33 18 | 4 6.06 39.39 19 | 14 21.21 60.61 20 | 8 12.12 72.73 21 | 6 9.09 81.82 22 | 5 7.58 89.39 23 | 5 7.58 96.97 24 | 2 3.03 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#21 Diamonds are Forever [Rank: 17.76, Variance: 14.55]

If the top section is the gold-standard of Bond, this is where we reach the ice-standard of Bond (e.g. ice hotel). There is a significant jump in agreement for these final four films. These are bad, and few would claim otherwise. For example, over 95% place Diamonds are Forever in the bottom half of films.

var7 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 6 | 1 1.52 1.52 7 | 1 1.52 3.03 9 | 1 1.52 4.55 13 | 1 1.52 6.06 14 | 11 16.67 22.73 15 | 4 6.06 28.79 16 | 4 6.06 34.85 17 | 5 7.58 42.42 18 | 10 15.15 57.58 19 | 6 9.09 66.67 20 | 5 7.58 74.24 21 | 3 4.55 78.79 22 | 6 9.09 87.88 23 | 7 10.61 98.48 24 | 1 1.52 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#22 Quantum of Solace [Rank: 18.35, Variance: 16.98]

Far and away the worst ranked film of the Craig era, zero publications put Quantum of Solace in the top 7, though it does often trickle down to mediocre territory in some lists, as opposed to being just plain bad.

var22 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 8 | 2 3.03 3.03 11 | 3 4.55 7.58 12 | 1 1.52 9.09 13 | 6 9.09 18.18 14 | 1 1.52 19.70 15 | 3 4.55 24.24 16 | 4 6.06 30.30 17 | 5 7.58 37.88 18 | 6 9.09 46.97 19 | 4 6.06 53.03 20 | 6 9.09 62.12 21 | 4 6.06 68.18 22 | 10 15.15 83.33 23 | 8 12.12 95.45 24 | 3 4.55 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#23 A View to a Kill [Rank: 19.05, Variance: 15.62]

There is little love for old-man Moore - 97% of publications put A View to a Kill in the bottom half. There is a huge plurality of 21% that place the film at second-to-last, and this is because for many, there is one film that is undoubtedly worse...

var14 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 8 | 1 1.52 1.52 10 | 1 1.52 3.03 12 | 4 6.06 9.09 13 | 1 1.52 10.61 14 | 3 4.55 15.15 15 | 3 4.55 19.70 16 | 3 4.55 24.24 17 | 5 7.58 31.82 18 | 6 9.09 40.91 19 | 5 7.58 48.48 20 | 8 12.12 60.61 21 | 3 4.55 65.15 22 | 3 4.55 69.70 23 | 14 21.21 90.91 24 | 6 9.09 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

#24 Die Another Day [Rank: 21.29, Variance: 15.87]

Here it is, the largest plurality in the entire survey. A whopping 41% of publications rank Die Another Day at the very bottom, and nearly two-thirds place it in the bottom 3.

var20 | Freq. Percent Cum.------------+----------------------------------- 3 | 1 1.52 1.52 6 | 1 1.52 3.03 14 | 2 3.03 6.06 16 | 1 1.52 7.58 17 | 3 4.55 12.12 18 | 3 4.55 16.67 19 | 5 7.58 24.24 20 | 3 4.55 28.79 21 | 4 6.06 34.85 22 | 8 12.12 46.97 23 | 8 12.12 59.09 24 | 27 40.91 100.00------------+----------------------------------- Total | 66 100.00

Publications surveyed:

Den of Geek, Vulture, GameRadar, Yardbarker, Syfy, Esquire, Timeout, Men's Journal, NY Post, Independent.uk, Slash Film, Ultimate Classic Rock, ScreenRant, Parade, Reader's Digest, The Film Magazine, Film Daft, GQ UK, Film Daily, GQ AU, Studio Binder, San Francisco Chronicle, ScreenRant - Mark Zambrano, Sydney Morning Herald, CrimeReads, FandomWire, What To Watch, ScreenCrush, Forbes - Scott Mendelson, Calvin Dyson, Filmsite, Looper, Thrillist, Spling Movies, The Anomalous Host, World Newz Info, Brain Sharper, Report Door, Fashion Beans, Film Hounds, Tokyo Fox, Enterainment Weekly, Digital Spy, Taste of Cinema - Richard Austin, That Shelf, Tell Tales Online, Indiewire, Fansided, The Irish Times, Mirror.co.uk, Toronto Sun, Murder & Mayhem, T3, Econoclash, Film Quarantine, The Things, Hugo Mongoose, Gamespot, Consequence, The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw, News.com.AU, Yahoo Movies UK, Saturday Evening Post, New Arena, Next Luxury, Art Glut

You can download the complete dataset from the following link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F3B4nsju3Md45lh_UcU6S6YAkIUk-Rgv/view?usp=sharing

You can also see the full dataset here:

007.ods