Unit 2 Objectives & Targeted Content
The republican ideal in the U.S. is manifested in the structure and operation of the legislative branch.
2.1 - Describe the different structures, powers, and functions of each house of Congress.
The Senate is designed to represent states equally, while the House is designed to represent the population.
Different chamber sizes and constituencies influence formality of debate.
Coalitions in Congress are affected by term-length differences.
The enumerated and implied powers in the Constitution allow the creation of public policy by Congress, which includes:
Passing a federal budget
raising revenue
coining money
Declaring war
maintaining the armed forces
Enacting legislation that addresses a wide range of economic, environmental, and social issues based on the necessary and proper clause
2.2 - Explain how the structure, powers, and functions of both houses of Congress affect the policy-making process.
By design, the different structures, powers, and functions of the Senate and the House of Representatives affect the policy-making process.
Though both chambers rely on committees to conduct hearings and debate bills under consideration, different constitutional responsibilities of the House and Senate affect the policy-making process.
Chamber-specific procedures, rules, and roles that impact the policy-making process include:
Number of chamber and debate rules that set the bar high for building majority support
Roles of Speaker of the House, President of the Senate, party leadership, and committee leadership in both chambers
Filibuster and cloture
Holds and unanimous consent in the Senate
Role of Rules Committee, Committee of the Whole, and discharge petitions in the House
Treaty ratification and confirmation role of the U.S. Senate
Congress must generate a budget that addresses both discretionary and mandatory spending, and as entitlement costs grow, discretionary spending opportunities will decrease unless tax revenues increase or the budget deficit increases.
Pork-barrel legislation and logrolling affect lawmaking in both chambers.
2.3 - Explain how congressional behavior is influenced by election processes, partisanship, and divided government.
Congressional behavior and governing effectiveness are influenced by:
Ideological divisions within Congress that can lead to gridlock or create the need for negotiation and compromise
Gerrymandering, redistricting, and unequal representation of constituencies have been partially addressed by the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr (1962), which opened the door to equal protection challenges to redistricting and started the “one person, one vote” doctrine, and the no-racial-gerrymandering decision in Shaw v. Reno (1993)
Elections that have led to a divided government, including partisan votes against presidential initiatives and congressional refusal to confirm appointments of “lame-duck” presidents of the opposite party
Different role conceptions of “trustee,” “delegate,” and “politico” as related to constituent accountability in each chamber
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3 - Baker v. Carr (1962)
2.3 - Baker v. Carr (1962)
2.3 - Shaw v. Reno (1993)
2.3 - Shaw v. Reno (1993)
The Presidency has been enhanced beyond its expressed constitutional powers.
2.4 -Explain how the president can implement a policy agenda through each of the informal and formal powers of the presidency.
Presidents use powers and perform functions of the office to accomplish a policy agenda.
Formal and informal powers of the president include:
Vetoes and pocket vetoes—formal powers that enable the president to check Congress
Foreign policy—both formal (commander- in-chief and treaties) and informal (executive agreements) powers that influence relations with foreign nations
Bargaining and persuasion—informal power that enables the president to secure congressional action
Executive orders—implied from the president’s vested “executive power,” or from power delegated by Congress, executive orders allow the president to manage the federal government
Signing statements—informal power that informs Congress and the public of the president’s interpretation of laws passed by Congress and signed by the president
2.5 -Explain how the president’s agenda can create tension and frequent confrontations with Congress with respect to executive appointments and the Congressional agenda.
The potential for conflict with the Senate depends upon the type of executive branch appointments, including:
Cabinet members
Ambassadors
White House Staff
Senate confirmation is an important check on appointment powers, but the president’s longest lasting influence lies in life-tenured judicial appointments.
Policy initiatives and executive orders promoted by the president often lead to conflict with the congressional agenda.
2.6 - Explain how presidents have interpreted and justified their use of formal and informal powers.
Justifications for a single executive are set forth in Federalist No. 70.
Term-of-office and constitutional-power restrictions, including the passage of the Twenty-Second Amendment, demonstrate changing presidential roles.
2.7 - Explain how communication technology has changed the president’s relationship with the national constituency and other branches.
The communication impact of the presidency can be demonstrated through such factors as:
Modern technology, social media, and rapid response to political issues
Nationally broadcast State of the Union messages and the president’s bully pulpit used as tools for agenda setting
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
The design of the judicial branch protects the Supreme Court’s independence as a branch of government, and the emergence and use of judicial review remains a powerful judicial practice.
2.8 - Explain the principle of judicial review and how it checks the power of other institutions and state governments.
The foundation for powers of the judicial branch and how its independence checks the power of other institutions and state governments are set forth in:
Article III of the Constitution
Federalist No. 78
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
2.9-2.10 - Explain how the exercise of judicial review in conjunction with life tenure can lead to debate about the legitimacy of the Supreme Court’s power.
Precedents and stare decisis play an important role in judicial decision making.
Ideological changes in the composition of the Supreme Court due to presidential appointments have led to the Court’s establishing new or rejecting existing precedents.
Controversial or unpopular court decisions can lead to challenges to the court’s legitimacy and power that Congress and the president can address only through future appointments, legislation changing the Court’s jurisdiction, or refusing to implement decisions.
Political discussion about the Supreme Court’s power is illustrated by the ongoing debate over judicial activism versus judicial restraint.
2.11B - Explain how other branches in the government can limit the Supreme Court’s power.
Restrictions on the Supreme Court are represented by:
Congressional legislation to modify the impact of prior Supreme Court decisions
Constitutional amendments
Judicial appointments and confirmations
The president and states evading or ignoring Supreme Court decisions
Legislation impacting court jurisdiction
Article III
Federalist # 78
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.10
2.10-2.11
2.11
The federal bureaucracy implements federal policies.
2.12- Explain how the bureaucracy carries out the responsibilities of the federal government by executing its various tasks.
Tasks performed by departments, agencies, commissions, and government corporations are represented by:
Writing and enforcing regulations
Issuing fines
Testifying before Congress
Issue networks and “iron triangles”
Political patronage, civil service, and merit system reforms all impact the effectiveness of the bureaucracy by promoting professionalism, specialization, and neutrality.
2.13 - Explain how the federal bureaucracy uses delegated discretionary authority for rule making and implementation.
Discretionary and rule-making authority to implement policy are given to bureaucratic agencies, including:
Department of Homeland Security
Department of Transportation
Department of Veterans Affairs
Department of Education
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
2.14A - Explain how Congress uses its oversight power in its relationship with the executive branch.
Oversight and methods used by Congress to ensure that legislation is implemented as intended are represented by:
Committee hearings
Power of the purse
As a means to curtail the use of presidential power, congressional oversight serves as a check of executive authorization and appropriation.
2.14B - Explain how the President ensures that executive branch agencies and departments carry out their responsibilities in concert with the goals of the administration.
Presidential ideology, authority, and influence affect how executive branch agencies carry out the goals of the administration.
Compliance monitoring can pose a challenge to policy implementation.
2.15 - Explain the extent to which governmental branches can hold the bureaucracy accountable given the competing interests of Congress, the President, and the federal courts.
Formal and informal powers of Congress, the president, and the courts over the bureaucracy are used to maintain its accountability.
2.12
2.12
2.13
2.13
2.14
2.14-2.15
2.15
Unit 2 Review Materials
JB's Slides on Voting Rights and Behavior
SAS/AAA Social Studies Department Head
JB's Slides on Elections and Campaign Finance
SAS/AAA Social Studies Department Head
JB's Slides on Political Parties
SAS/AAA Social Studies Department Head
JB's Slides on Congress
SAS/AAA Social Studies Department Head