The problem of clinical underrepresentation
The underrepresentation of cisgender women in clinical and preclinical research is a problem that remains highly relevant today. Despite the fact that in the United States, since 1993, a law has required NIH-funded clinical studies to include both men and women, there is no regulation mandating the inclusion of animals of both sexes in preclinical studies.
In preclinical research, the use of male animals also predominates, as they are considered easier to study because they are not subject to the hormonal variations typical of females. However, this leads to limited transferability of results to clinical practice and to gaps in knowledge regarding biological differences between the sexes. For this reason, there is now increasing recognition of the need to include balanced numbers of animals of both sexes from the earliest stages of research, since ignoring these differences may compromise the safety and effectiveness of medications.
As a result, the AFAB population continues to be strongly underrepresented: AFAB people account for about 30% of trial participants, even though their life expectancy is longer (84.7 years compared to 80.1 years for men) and their period of illness-related disability is more prolonged, leading to more extensive use of medications.
Historically, until the twentieth century, the AFAB body was considered not to differ from the AMAB body except for the reproductive system, a view rooted in a patriarchal culture. Today, the exclusion of AFAB from trials is also linked to economic reasons and to the desire to simplify studies: hormonal cyclicity and the different stages of life (pregnancy, breastfeeding, menopause), as well as the use of hormonal contraceptives, make AFAB a complex population to analyze.
However, biological differences between the sexes profoundly influence the efficacy and safety profile of drugs. AFAB show significant differences in absorption, metabolism, and elimination (ADME), mainly due to hormones, lower body mass, higher percentage of body fat, and specific features of the gastrointestinal system. For example, in female individuals the higher proportion of adipose tissue favors the distribution of lipophilic drugs, whereas in men it favors that of hydrophilic drugs. Women also have slower gastric emptying, reduced intestinal motility, higher gastric acidity, and a lower renal filtration rate, which prolongs drug residence time in the body and increases the risk of toxicity.
Despite this, drug dosages continue to be based on the standard model of a 70-kg cisgender man, without adequately taking into account differences related to sex, gender, age, ethnicity, weight, and body composition. This lack of personalization may be among the causes of the increased incidence of side effects and adverse drug reactions in women.