How to raise society's pro-environmental standards is far from understood. Living up to pro-environmental standards might be considered a moral duty and people who show outstanding pro-environmental behavior could be viewed as moral exemplars that may serve as a source of inspiration for people.
Indeed, many findings suggest that people can experience feelings of moral elevation when witnessing acts of uncommon moral virtue that in turn elicit imitation response and the desire to become a “better person”.
However, other studies also reveal that people can potentially perceive outstanding moral exemplars as a threat both to their self-concept and their social identity due to negative social comparison.
The project encompasses six studies and advances a new psychological approach to understanding how to use the inspirational power of pro-environmental models to spread pro-environmental behaviors by looking at those boundary conditions that can reduce such inspirational power
The general aim of this research is to establish an innovative paradigm and theoretical approach for the study of moral attitudes and judgments in order to promote pro-environmental behaviors
When do people imitate ingroup outstanding pro-environmental models?
Whether intergroup comparison affects people's own motivation to imitate ingroup pro-environmental models?
Why, under some circumstances, are group members willing to renegade rather than imitate moral exemplars?
The project is composed by six studies, divided into 3 phases.
Examining the impact of an outstanding pro-environmental target’s membership (ingroup vs. outgroup) and the saliency of a negative comparison (high saliency vs. low saliency) on individuals’ willingness to engage in pro-environmental behaviors.
Examining the impact of the group context (intragroup vs intergroup) and the saliency of the negative comparison (high saliency vs. low saliency) on collective self-esteem and elevation and in turn on emulative behaviors.
Examining the impact of a competitive intergroup context (vs. collaborative) and its interaction with the centrality of the outstanding pro-environmental target within the ingroup (high vs. low) and the group status (high vs. low) on collective self-esteem and elevation and in turn on the willingness to imitate him/her and to interact with him/her in the future.