Each year, the Women’s Studies Department awards prizes for the best undergraduate and graduate essays on women written at the University of Michigan. The prizes honor the memory of Dorothy Gies McGuigan, a distinguished alumna of the University of Michigan who taught in the School of Business Administration and the Residential College. Essays are evaluated by an interdisciplinary committee for their contribution to our understanding of some aspect of women's lives or roles, as well as for their originality and clarity of presentation.
"'Too Common To Count? 'Minor' Sexual Assault and Aggression in College Social Settings"
Psychology and Women’s Studies doctoral candidate Leanna Papp is the winner of the 2020 Dorothy McGuigan graduate student prize for her paper, “Too Common To Count? ‘Minor’ Sexual Assault and Aggression in College Social Settings.” This paper is notable not only for its original and sophisticated use of an intimate justice framework to refine our understanding of the variegated experiences of college sexual assault and aggression, but for its carefully considered methodological contribution to researchers’ tools to measure such instances. Examining how college women describe their non-consensual gendered experiences at parties and bars—e.g., of groping and grinding, pressure to drink or dance, and the use of deception to isolate them—the study reveals a gap between such routine forms of unwanted touch and attention and the ability of current common survey instruments to acknowledge such occurrences. Comparing data from focus groups with that of a recent climate survey, this beautifully written, coherently argued paper demonstrates how such “mundane” encounters are obscured and normalized as an acceptable part of women’s lives. Its pointed recommendation to include “sexualized aggression” as a concept in conversations about campus climate has far-reaching implications for policy, including on UM’s own campus.
"Health Implications of Incarcerating Pregnant Individuals"
Gender and Health minor Shayna Roble’s essay, “Health Implications of Incarcerating Pregnant Individuals,” is an eloquent, urgent, and well-researched piece of feminist scholarship. Roble’s argument is seemingly simple— “The effects of incarceration on pregnancies are important to address due to the vulnerable population it encompasses, the large number of incarcerated people this is applicable to, the health impacts on both the parent and baby, and because the negative effects follow those individuals throughout their lifetime” (4)—but Roble’s scholarship shows in meticulous and systematic fashion how complicated, far-reaching, and entrenched the problems are.
Roble offers a comprehensive discussion of the research on the various constraints incarcerated people suffer while pregnant. Such duress ranges from nutritional needs not being met to the horrific persistence of shackling both during and after pregnancy to the physical separation of the infant from the person who gave birth. Significantly, Roble accounts for the stark disparities in the demographic between incarcerated and non-incarcerated individuals. As Roble puts it, “Incarcerated women are more likely than civilians to be affected by substance abuse, intimate partner violence, sexual and physical abuse, little education, homelessness, joblessness, STIs, chronic disorders, mental health, low income [and more likely to] be a person of color” (10). Roble of course is careful not to attribute these conditions as causes of incarceration but rather is pointing to the aggregate oppressive systems that make already marginalized people all the more vulnerable to criminalization. As of 2016, Roble later states, Black Americans, precisely because of these systems, were imprisoned at five times the rate of white people and twice the rate of Hispanic people, and that black children and Hispanic children were 7.5 times and 2.5 times more likely to have a parent in prison than white children. What’s more, LGBTQ people are also at higher risk for incarceration than heterosexual cisgender individuals. Indeed, while Roble doesn’t make this point explicitly, the essay’s use of the term “pregnant individuals,” rather than “pregnant women,” accounts for the individuals along the gender spectrum who don’t identify as women and are able to become pregnant.
Roble’s comprehensive analysis of the health implications of incarcerated individuals, and who is at greatest risk to these implications, is timely and cogent. While Roble stops short of calling for the abolition of prisons, Roble offers concrete recommendations on how to make pregnancy safer in prison, ranging from doing away with the use of shackles to doula support systems to enhanced visitation programs. Reforms that do so might offer these often neglected people “humane, dignified, and safe treatment throughout their pregnancy and birth experience” (18).
"Rita Moreno, From West Side Story to One Day at a Time: My Understanding of Latina-ness Portrayed in Hollywood"
Every year, the Department of Women’s Studies presents the Feminist Practice Award to majors and minors whose work in community service or social action best exemplifies the application of feminist thought to practice.
The 2020 Women’s Studies Feminist Practice Award winner, Shaima Abdullah, is a brilliant model of turning feminist thought into practice, demonstrating her commitment to transformative social justice to an impressive range of communities on the University of Michigan campus and beyond. Through her activism in support of students of color, as well as her experience as a teaching fellow with various organizations such as the Office of Multi-Ethnic Student Affairs (MESA), Office of Intergroup Relations (IGR), the Michigan Library, the Central Academy and the Pedagogy of Empowerment class, she has engaged numerous students and other communities, stressing the importance of addressing social justice issues with a feminist, intersectional lens. Shaima has also served on the Women’s Studies Undergraduate Studies Committee and helped coordinate the Girls of Color Symposium for high school students, bringing feminism to a new generation on the UM campus. In addition, she is active with the Coalition for Queer and Trans People of Color, and serves as Co-President of the Yemeni Students’ Association which she founded.
A Women's Studies major, Shaima emphasizes community building, along with community care, dedicated not just to changing systems but also to improving upon self and interpersonal health and relations.
The Women's Studies administrative team would like to thank Emily Lawsin for the compelling faculty nomination.
Congratulations to all our graduating honors students on the completion of their thesis projects!
To learn more about their work and view their video presentations, visit our Digital Honors Symposium website.
The Honors Program provides Women’s Studies and Gender and Health majors the opportunity to complete a comprehensive, original research project as a culmination of their undergraduate studies. The thesis is researched and written during the students’ junior and senior years under the guidance of a Women's Studies faculty member. Theses can take a number of forms, including activism work, research projects, or creative/performance pieces, but all projects include a significant piece of scholarly writing.