Rubric for Peer Review

Aspects Assessed

1 RELEVANCE TO THEME (10%)

How related the contents of the paper are to the Conference Theme.

2 ACADEMIC QUALITY (15%)

Whether the paper is of the intellectual quality expected in a university setting.

3 DEPTH OF ANALYSIS (25%)

Whether the makes an in-depth analysis of the problem and provides a fitting solution.

4 ORIGINALITY (20%)

Whether the paper provides more that the usual insights met when studying this topic.

5 APPLICABILITY (20%)

Whether the conclusions of the paper can shed light on the situation or provide a feasible solution.

6 LANGUAGE (10%)

Whether the language used makes it easy for a university-level reader to understand and appreciate.

Nota Bene:

Plagiarism would not be appropriate or acceptable in any academic publication. For this reason, we presume that the writers can fully understand that any significantly-clear sign of plagiarism would result in the disqualification of the paper from publication.

Publication

All the approved papers have a right to appear in the Proceedings that will be published after the Symposium. These proceedings will have an ISBN number.
The Symposium Committee, on the other hand, will respect the desire of any writer to publish his or her article in another publication or journal as long as that desire is communicated to us before the publication work on the Proceedings is begun.
The winner of The Best Paper Award may take into consideration that the cash prize given will be useful for any cost of publication in another publication or journal.

Page updated

Report abuse