Program
Session One (Friday Morning April 27, 9:15 - 12:30)
Isabelle Charnavel (Harvard)
Do anaphors compete with anything?
Sandra Chung and Matthew Wagers (UCSC)
Competition among pronouns in Chamorro grammar and sentence processing
Jane Middleton (University College London)
Everyone left the room, except the logophor: *ABA patterns in pronominal morphology
Session Two (Friday Afternoon April 27, 2:00 - 4:45)
Shayne Sloggett (Northwestern)
Processing pressures and locality in English reflexive comprehension
Pranav Anand (UCSC)
Perspectives for pronouns and reflexives
Rodica Ivan (Amherst)
No condition B? Context-dependent surface-form preference!
Session Three (Saturday Morning April 28, 9:30 - 12:00)
Aya Meltzer-Asscher (Tel Aviv)
Resumption, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing?
Adam Milton Morgan, Titus von der Malsburg*, Victor S. Ferreira and Eva Wittenberg (UCSD and *Potsdam)
English resumptive pronouns hinder comprehension
James McCloskey (UCSC)
Observations and speculations concerning resumption (in Irish)
Session Four (Saturday Afternoon April 28, 2:00 - 5:00)
Sandhya Sundaresan (Leipzig)
Silent pro-forms in competition: tracing PRO and pro to a single source
Ivy Sichel (UCSC)
Demonstrative pronouns, appraisal, and competition
Ken Safir (Rutgers)
Eliminating the Competition
Poster Presentations (Saturday April 28, Noon - 2pm)
Kirby Conrod (Washington)
What does it mean to agree? Coreference with singular they
Alex Goebel (Amherst)
On German D-pronouns as Anti-Logophoric: Limiting a Competition-Based Account
Christopher Hammerly (Amherst)
Intrusive resumption can ameliorate island violations in real-time comprehension
Ivona Kučerova (McMaster)
Anaphors and logophors differ in timing: evidence from comitative constructions
Nicholas LaCara (Toronto)
Anaphoric one: When ellipsis is blocked
Thomas McFadden (ZAS, Berlin)
Pronominal competition involves realization and interpretation, not licensing