I submitted my research paper at 6:41 am. It's been less than six wakeful hours since. I pulled my first real all-nighter. Was the paper in fact due at 11:59 the previous night? Yes. Will Professor Short be mad? My mom and I are hoping not. My mom seems more concerned than I am. My rationale was that Prof. Short would not be impatiently awaiting late papers at 12:01. In any case, I thought, screw it, this will get in when it's ready to get in. Furthermore, my essay spills down to the greater half of the sixteenth page (sorry, Professor). And that was with several regrettable downsizes and depressing paragraph deletions. In fact, I compiled a notecard with most of these rejects, since it was too hard to simply backspace them into oblivion (my last English teacher called me an "idea hoarder"). If, for some inconceivable reason, you would be interested in glancing at them, click on the button below this paragraph.
My point is this: there was not a single time during the entirety of this research project where I felt 100% assured in my progress and decision-making. Not when committing to a primary source 8 or so weeks ago, and definitely not when I impulsively decided to end my paper with, "After all, that's about as paradoxical as the show itself" less than 24 hours earlier. It's been a hectic flurry of blog posts and acquiring secondary sources and then having to get rid of secondary sources because I had no room for them and 3 am delirium, and yet, in spite of it all and in some warped way, I really enjoyed it.
To some extent, I don't think my midnight madness was all that necessary, but some part of me felt it was. I was thoroughly invested in my topic and ended up falling into a kind of Jack Ryan rabbit hole that made me question what exactly my argument was every 2 or so minutes. Equal parts entertaining and frustrating. There were definitely points along the research project where the very notion of Jack Ryan was mentally repugnant. And this is a show I used to binge-watch - repeatedly - in order to wind down. But in those adrenalized 2 am moments doing the last of my primary source analysis, I found myself rejuvenated in my passion for the series, interestingly reliving some of the same emotion I'd had upon first watching it for some scenes and feeling differently for others. For example, I don't think there'll ever be a time where I can stomach the almost-r*pe scene between Hanin and Yazid without physically retracting from my computer and cringing away squeamishly. In that case, it was a matter of "grab the timestamp and run." But in other scenes, like the Ali vs. Jack scene (which I've discussed in these posts maybe around 32 times by now), it was intriguing to realize that my perception and emotions had noticeably shifted since my first viewing, even when I wasn't intentionally trying to watch for a facial expression here or listen to some line of dialogue there. I remember being concerned the first time around for Jack's safety (yes, Jack!) after he'd shot Ali, thinking the latter's show of emotion was simply a ruse so that Jack would let his guard down (how absurd). Now I watch that scene with a profound admiration for Haaz Sleiman's (who plays Ali) acting and feel incredibly moved by Ali's persona in the show. It's interesting to consider that merely thinking about how the tropes and techniques films use to sway our perception can change it altogether. As in, if we take a second to evaluate how and why we're feeling, those conceptions can fundamentally evolve.
It has just occurred to me that I may not have addressed the prompt for this blog post whatsoever so... let's do that.
Finally figuring out how my last few paragraphs would fit together was relieving because I was genuinely freaking out as to how to integrate such seemingly singular and discrete sections. It was interesting to realize how secondary sources, which seemed diametrically opposed in their arguments, could actually be simultaneously true. Being dramatic in my primary analysis was also fun.
Having to remove ideas that I felt were promising because they physically did not fit and contributed less to the argument was a bit disheartening. As the night progressed, even basic word choice and sentence structure began to really wear me out. I'm still questioning how cohesive my paper is - hopefully it doesn't feel like completely unrelated ideas have been forced together.
I learned that it helps to first be (very) specific when utilizing online databases, and only afterwards widen your horizons to larger umbrella themes. I learned that it helps to read a lot of secondary sources before beginning to craft an argument. I also learned what an em dash was - for like two seconds --- but then lost all conception of the punctuation mark's entire premise.
The research paper was a great avenue for us to internalize the concepts we've learned in the humanities core. It's one thing to learn about the history of dehumanization in traditions like the human zoo or freak shows. It's another to realize that those traditions are continuously recycled in the present day -- even in mediums we might never expect them to. This startling realization impels me to now appraise new media and current institutions with a healthy dose of skepticism and to question whether they're driven by any particular hidden agenda. That shift in perception and the subjective matter of perspective has been central in my research process. It's been (mostly) a joy to watch that idea grow.
Here's my completed paper for funsies. I think you'll be okay if you can get past the hook. Thanks for stopping by!
<3 - Rushika