While the modern scientific community is increasingly recognizing the importance of equality, diversity, and inclusion, this was not always the case. The lasting effects of this discrimination are dangerous for our understanding of scientific history and who receives credit for certain works. When only a specific demographic is highlighted (typically Western, white males), it creates barriers by discouraging other groups, as they remain underrepresented in STEM (scientific, technology, engineering, and mathematics) communities. It has also introduced a closed-minded, one-perspective approach to scientific inquiry, which can be seen in the underrepresentation of research on women and the tendency for male-based findings to be applied universally. Additionally, it creates a trust gap between science and society. Individuals are less willing to accept research findings when the community is ultimately built on a shaky foundation of prejudice. This can slow the development of new discoveries, as disregarding original sources that hold valuable information limits access to necessary knowledge. There is also a risk that marginalized groups will be historically undermined in their contributions. These groups may be marginalized due to sex, race, culture, or beliefs. In an effort to shed light on a marginalized individual, we created this platform to challenge those narratives, celebrate overlooked pioneers, and redefine what true transparency looks like in science.