In the dynamic landscape of civil engineering, I find my deepest interest lies in the potential of numerical modeling as a tool for transformative changes. As I navigate through the complexities of mathematics and weave them into engineering practices, I am fascinated by the diverse ways we can predict and understand the behavior of structures. I explore various modeling techniques to simulate above- and under-ground structures, e.g., concrete masonry walls, underground pipes (e.g., tunnels, pipelines), foundations.
The main thrust of this sub-topic is to explore the applicability of modeling techniques readily available in ABAQUS for FE simulation of masonry walls.
Highlights:
Contact-based cohesive surfaces to describe the tensile and shear behaviors of mortar joints
Material importance investigation on the IP and OOP behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls
(2) Plasticity-based multi-yield surfaces constitutive model of cohesive interfaces for modeling mortar joints
The main objective is to develop a refined constitutive model by addressing the limitations of the contact-based cohesive surface (e.g., underestimation of shear strength, no compressive-related failure criterion considered, no dilatancy effects considered).
Highlights:
Two hyperbolic yield surfaces capable of capturing various failure modes (e.g., tensile cracking, shear sliding, compressive crushing)
An unassociated flow rule to capture the 'dilatancy' phenomenon
A fully implicit Euler backward integration algorithm combined with the local-global Newton-Raphson method guarantees accuracy
An error-based auto-adaptive sub-stepping algorithm to achieve robustness and efficiency
Implementation of the constitutive model in the general FE framework
Graphic representation for the predictor–corrector strategy for the multi-yield surface model
Graphic representation of the general idea for sub-stepping backward integration
Developed algorithm for multi-yield surfaces plasticity constitutive model
(3) Damage-plasticity-based multi-yield surfaces constitutive model for cohesive interfaces
This model is developed by extending the previous plasticity-based model, to simulate the cyclic behavior of mortar joints (e.g., stiffness degradation, stiffness recovery, irreversible deformation)
Highlights:
An extension from plasticity-based framework to damage-plasticity framework
Consideration of stiffness degradation, stiffness recovery, and strength softening/hardening
A robust semi-implicit algorithm for the damage-plasticity integration problem
Finite element validation of the developed cyclic model
(4) Finite element modeling of masonry walls under combined in-plane and out-of-plane loading
Current design guidelines and behavior assessments for masonry walls are limited to pure in-plane (IP) or pure out-of-plane (OOP) loading. This is a pioneering work to investigate the structural behavior of masonry walls under combined IP and OOP loading. Emphasis is put on both unreinforced and reinforced masonry (URM and RM) walls. Moreover, a series of capacity interaction curves are developed to provide practical guidance for designing masonry walls in such loading scenarios.
Highlights:
Micro modeling strategies employed for the simulation URM and RM walls (shown below)
User-friendly python tools developed for the modeling of masonry walls
A large numerical database for masonry walls generated with various wall configurations (a total of 252 models for unreinforced masonry walls and 336 models for reinforced masonry walls)
Comprehensive investigation of design parameters (i.e., aspect ratio, slenderness ratio, pre-compression load, reinforcement ratio) on IP and OOP capacity interactions of masonry walls
Analytical model proposed for IP-OOP capacity interaction curves
Modeling strategy for URM walls
Modeling strategy for RM walls
Failure modes of a URM wall with different pre-applied OOP load levels: (a) 0%, (b) 20%, (c) 40%, (d) 60%, and (e) 80% of pure OOP capacity (deformation scale factor: 15)
Associated IP load-deformation behaviors
Capacity interaction curves of URM walls
Performance of developed analytical model of interaction curve for URM walls
Failure modes of wall AR0.67_SR8.42 under a pre-compression load of 2.50 MPa with different pre-applied OOP load levels: (a) 20%, (b) 40%, (c) 60%, and (d) 80% of OOP capacity obtained under pure OOP loading (Deformation scale factor: 15)
Capacity interaction curves of RM walls
(5) Discrete element modeling of tunnelling excavation in fractured rock zone
This project focuses on Nepal’s first TBM excavation tunnel, the Bheri Babai Diversion Multipurpose Project, which navigates through significantly fractured jointed rock. To assess the stability of the tunnel lining, the excavation process is simulated using discrete element modeling in the Itasca 3DEC. This method provides a detailed analysis of rock behavior and fracture patterns, ultimately improving the prediction of structural stability during excavation.
Highlights:
Simulation of the TBM driving procedure, including the advancement of the rigid cutter-head, its interaction with the flexible rock mass, and the applied torque.
Detailed modeling of the fractured rock mass, taking into account joint spacings, dips, and inclinations.
Cutter head and applied torque
Discrete element model
Shear displacement of joints in the fracture rock mass
(6) Finite element modeling of bond-slip behavior of support lining structures in the railway tunnel
Understanding bond-slip behavior is crucial for the performance of reinforced concrete structures. This sub-topic focuses on simulating the mechanical response, such as crack distribution, of support lining structures following tunnel excavation.
Highlights:
Application of Winkler foundation beam theory to model the contact relationship between concrete and surrounding soil.
Simulation of compressive crushing and tensile cracking behaviors with the Solid65 concrete element in the ANSYS finite element package.
Explicit modeling of reinforcement bars with non-zero length spring elements, while bond-slip behavior is represented by zero-length spring elements and force-slip relationships.
Support lining structure Reinforcement bars Crack distribution of support lining structures
(7) Numerical simulation of dynamic behaviors of support lining structure in heavy-haul
railway tunnel with voided base
This project aims to analyze the time-history behavior of support lining structures in railway tunnels, particularly under the voided base condition, which is common in heavy-haul railway tunnels.
Highlights:
Dynamic load determination incorporating the axial load of the vehicle body and track irregularities.
Development of three-dimensional finite difference models for the load-tunnel-soil system in Itasca FLAC 3D.
Prediction of the fatigue life of concrete lining based on the S-N curve of concrete.
Schematic diagram for under-track base void of the railway tunnel
Time-history curve of train excitation load
Time-history curve for vertical velocity of the inverter arch under different void cases: (a) void width, and (b) void thickness
(8) Formation mechanism of voided bases in railway tunnels
Voided bases present a significant threat to the structural safety of tunnel support systems. This study investigates the formation mechanism of voided bases in railway tunnels, primarily attributed to the differing mechanical behaviors of concrete lining and surrounding soil. Concrete lining is typically more rigid than soil, leading to limited irreversible deformation under repeated loading. In contrast, soil, which is more flexible, undergoes permanent deformation that does not fully recover during the unloading phase. Over time, this discrepancy causes the formation of voids beneath the concrete lining. This study provides a mechanical explanation for this phenomenon, offering insights into the underlying causes.
Highlights:
Cyclic plasticity model of soil considering ‘Ratcheting Effect’ developed
Two-dimensional plain-strain finite element model developed for track-tunnel-soil system
Formation of voided base in railway tunnels
Finite element model
Comparison of vertical displacements of concrete lining and soil