Primary:
Coudert, Allison P., and Taylor Corse, editors. Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, by Anne Conway, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996, pp. 1–2. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy.
Nicolson, Marjorie Hope and Sarah Hutton, editors. The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their Friends 1642-1684, Oxford University Press, 1992.
Secondary:
Grey, John. “Conway's Ontological Objection to Cartesian Dualism.” Philosopher's Imprint, Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 21 July 2017, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/3521354.0017.013/--conway-s-ontological-objection-to-cartesian-dualism?view=image.
Grey helps summarize Conway’s argument that she makes in her 6th chapter of Principles: Change. He gives a simplified description of Conway’s belief that spirit and material aren’t substantially different. Grey then demonstrates how Conway’s assertion refutes Descartes by describing his philosophy and the contradictions in it given that Conway’s assertion is true.
Broad, Jacqueline. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Jacqueline helps capture many of the important instances in Conway and More’s correspondence, which plays an important role in my Henry More webpage. In it, Jacqueline describes how Conway initially subscribed to More’s philosophy, but soon became independent in her beliefs and found conclusions contradictory to More’s. Furthermore, she even describes, with in-text citations from Conway’s Principles, how Conway refuted More. This citation also served the purpose of helping create a biographical account of Conway since it describes lots her life.
Gordon-Roth, Jessica. What Kind of Monist is Anne Finch Conway? Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2018.24
Gordon-Roth helps make Conway’s philosophy more digestible by describing what Conway meant by substance in her single treatise. She describes what Conway meant by some of the attributes of God and breaks down how these attributes corroborate Conway’s arguments. Gordon-Roth also makes an interesting argument about whether Conway really was a monist since she believed in 3 different substances, to which she clarified that she is indeed a monist with respect to the conversation of spirit and body.