Meet Rocky J. Gutiérrez!
Biography
R. J. Gutiérrez, Gordon Gullion Endowed Chair, emeritus, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
BS 1971: Colorado State University
MS 1973: University of New Mexico
PhD 1977: University of California, Berkeley
University Positions:
Cornell University (Assistant Professor)
Humboldt State University (retired, Full Professor)
University of Minnesota (retired, Full Professor and Endowed Chair)
University of Wisconsin, Madison (Senior Scientist)
Completed Graduate students: 39 MS, 5 PhD
Peer-reviewed publications: 198 (2 currently in submission)
Peer-reviewed publications in last 5 years: 35 (2 currently in submission)
Edited volumes and books: 14
Non peer-reviewed publications: 14
Publication relevance:
H index: 59
i10-index: 158
Journal Editorial Boards and Guest Editorships:
Wildlife Biology
Journal of Wildlife Management
Ornithological Applications
North American Fauna
Forest Science
Journal peer-reviewer: Approximately 25 international journals
"I developed my workshop for those interested in publishing either scientific research or other works in peer-reviewed journals. I created the workshop to aid graduate students and early career professionals, but I believe my workshop is relevant to mid-career or later professionals if they do not have extensive publishing experience. Hence, the workshop should be relevant to a wide spectrum of wildlife professionals.
My workshop covers two topics – publishing and reviewing. The publishing section focuses on the mechanisms and processes of publishing rather than providing specific advice about research design, data analysis, and writing. Therefore, it provides a framework for the process of publishing such that participants will understand what steps are needed to submit a manuscript successfully. The reviewing section provides an overview of the process of reviewing and the responsibilities of reviewers. Although many people who only publish a single (e.g., a thesis), may never be asked to review other papers, anyone who publishes several papers is likely to be asked to be a peer- reviewer. For these reasons, it is important to understand the review process, the ethics of reviewing, and that reviewing is essential to rapid advancement of science.
I intentionally discuss certain sections of the workshop superficially because I assume that everyone has been exposed to certain aspects of writing (e.g., the outline of a scientific paper). Nevertheless, I provide context to those sections as well as sharing a pdf of my PowerPoint presentation with participants so they can use the PPT to review the details of those sections for which I only provide an overview.
This workshop reflects my experience and personal perspectives. Yet there are other strategies one can use to negotiate the submittal process. So, I encourage participants to seek advice from others and to never stop seeking better ways to enhance your publishing skills.