Interpersonal Effectiveness - Emerging
As I began TLI I felt that I was pre-emerging for most competencies including Interpersonal Effectiveness and now I feel that I am in the emerging stage. While on paper it doesn't seem like a great deal of growth and it is far from the amount of growth I wanted to make, but I have learned a lot about myself as a teacher, teacher leader, and about our school communication culture as a result of TLI. I feel TLI has made me more aware of successful techniques for working with colleagues effectively. I have found that I cannot come in like a bulldozer and get rid of things I don't agree with and make major changes within a year. I spent more time listening to colleagues to truly understand their perspectives instead of assuming why they had the perspectives they did or assuming why they engaged in their various teaching practices. I was able to more confidently express my vision for a more successful instructional model for our school even though that was very difficult to do at times. While I feel I am firmly planted in the emerging stage right now I also crossed over into the developing stage in some ways. I was able to support several colleagues by listening to their ideas, struggles, and hopes for the future. Unfortunately, I don't feel it was enough people to be considered developing. I think in conjunction with my team teaching partner we shared a vision based on student needs and were able to share that vision with others, but that vision was not a school wide shared vision. I was also able to develop strong relationships with several colleagues that was built on trust but a shared vision was not always present.
Artifact 1
My team teaching partner and I had to work together effectively to support the needs of all our students while teaching together in the same classroom. We had many discussions of a shared vision of an equitable education for all students.
Artifact 2
My team teaching partner was able to reach out to the other Title I teachers and we had planned to meet and discuss some ideas for alternative grouping practices.
Artifact 3
A colleague expressed interest in what I was doing differently in reading. Shortly into the conversation she shifted the conversation to ability grouping and asked my opinion. After sharing my teaching philosophy on ability grouping it was clear she wanted to express her concerns. I listened to her views and opinions on ability grouping and was able to gain a greater perspective for why she and others are fearful of changing our current grouping model.
Artifact 4
In conjunction with the Leadership team we identified some key areas of focus from our staff surveys to begin addressing in cross grade level groups. Our k-2 team met to discuss suggestions for professional development, behavior, and staff resources.
Artifact 5
Throughout the year I was able to meet with one particular colleague that was very open minded. We were able to build a relationship built on mutual trust and were able to listen to the issues and perspectives of the other person even if we didn't always agree. We could engage in productive conversations about student needs and various ways to address those needs.
Communication - Emerging
Like my previous competency I feel I am now emerging in Communication. Without having read what strong communication really entailed I would have felt I had stronger communication skills that I really do. At the beginning of TLI I also felt our school had a strong culture of communication. However, after going through the TLI process I found that our school's and my communication was merely superficial. Going through the TLI process I realized the need for needs assessments to identify issues based on what the majority of the staff found as issues. As part of the Leadership team we administered two separate surveys and analyzed the results to find the most important issues that needed to be addressed in our school. It was difficult to accept that even though our results showed that our groups were not flexible people did not feel that was an issue and so as a team and staff we decided to focus on a couple other issues. I would like to continue improving my communication skills so that I can inspire others about a shared vision through various methods.
Explore and Challenge Inequity - Emerging
The TLI process helped me become hyper aware of the inequalities in our school, but to also make me more aware of the biases I make on a daily basis. The TLI process provided me with opportunities to evaluate my own biases. I feel that I am still in the emerging stage even though I have become more aware myself and am continuing to self-educate myself about inequalities and biases. One biases that I discovered I had was not one towards students, but one towards colleagues. I have tried to correct that bias by asking more questions and listening to colleagues' perspectives about various teaching practices and philosophies. Once I became aware of the biases we have towards students I felt the conversations addressing those biases were most difficult. I had a difficult time understanding how to address the biases so we could provide each student with a more equitable education without offending the other teacher. I do think my team teaching partner and I were able to explore in the developing stage as we were able to implement a plan that addressed the inequality of pulling students out of the general classroom and provide differentiated instruction and support to help them be successful within the general classroom. The next step would be to continue growing the vision that we can support students effectively without segregating them.
Artifact 9
One particular inequity presented itself in our grade level. Student A's STAR Math Assessment showed her to be higher performing that Student B. During a grade level meeting the classroom teacher of both students presented the argument that Student A was a lower performing student and needed more intensive instruction because she did not have the family support to help her make the necessary gains. She needed repeated practice to master new skills. This student was moved to our group mid year despite scoring higher than Student B. Student B was not moved to our group because the argument made in his defense was that he was a hard working student with a supportive family that would work with him at home. His classroom teacher described him as a bright student that needed more process time and repeated practice. Fortunately, both students were given the opportunity to be successful without being pulled out of the general classroom, but the bias that was presented in the reasoning for different grouping showed an example of the inequity in our current grouping practices.
Facilitating Collaborative Relationships
As with my other competencies I feel I am finishing the TLI process in the emerging stage of development but have practiced some qualities from the developing stage. I was able to build some strong relationships that led to a small collaborative culture. I would like to continue developing those skills so that I can help transform our school culture to one of collaboration. I found that as I expressed some different views on teaching philosophies this year our over all school culture seems okay until there are people that disagree. Disagreement brought on a feeling of fear from many colleagues and I would like to continue finding opportunities to learn how to engage in positive collaborative discussions. I was able to meet with several colleagues in one on one or small group settings to engage in discussion about learning and teaching. We were able to develop a collaborative meeting time with k-2 teachers and 3-5 teachers to engage in collaborative discussion about various issues. Many of our discussions seemed to try and figure out how we could get students to be more compliant or successful within our current systems rather than evaluating our teaching practices to determine the most appropriate way to address issues. This is an area I would like to continue improving upon.
See Artifacts 3, 4, and 5
Artifact 10
My team teaching partner and I reached out to the third grade teachers when we realized that there was a very strong possibility that our current students would then again be ability grouped when they transition to third grade. We were met with mixed responses, but overall I felt our meeting went well. Two of the classroom teachers were open to hearing what we did to keep all students in the general classroom and the special education teacher wanted to find a way to make it work in third grade because she felt strongly about giving her special education students the opportunity to learn with their peers and be successful. One classroom teacher was very opposed to the idea of having a mixed ability classroom and voiced her concerns where high achieving children would be in an environment where there would be in a classroom of mixed ability students. She was worried the high achieving students would not be challenged. We shared that all students regardless of achievement level were provided instruction and practice opportunities to challenge them.
In addition to our student growth data we shared some outside research that assisted us as we planned and discussed our plan for the year.
My teaching partner and I felt the meeting was successful in that most of the third grade teachers were at least open to listening even if they were not willing to move to a different grouping model themselves. Listening with an open mind was a step in the right direction. Unfortunately, this meeting led to a meeting with our principal because the meeting was taken as my team teaching partner and I trying to destroy staff moral by suggesting an alternative grouping model.
I think my biggest take away from the TLI process is that it has started me on the journey of looking beyond making improvements to myself and my classroom practices, but looking to how we can create a school-wide system of innovative, engaging, and equitable education for all students. I felt that the TLI process helped me reflect and evaluate myself as a teacher and teacher leader. While I aspire to be a positive teacher leader this process has made it clear that being a teacher leader is not easy and there are many varying levels of teacher leaders. At the beginning of the process I saw myself as a teacher leader in my school because I stay current on best teaching practices and not afraid to implement new practices in my classroom and offer support when others are implementing something new. I was also a teacher that many of my colleagues reached out to with questions especially dealing with technology. I felt that I was respected by most of my colleagues. Going through the TLI process I was humbled and had my eyes opened to the false leadership I thought I held. I found that people were willing to listen and learn about new technology implementations because it could be implemented on a individual level. Teachers could respect me for wanting to try something new and for sharing it but they could implement or not. However, when my teaching partner and I implemented a push-in model to replace our current grouping practice it received a completely different response from teachers. Teachers became fearful because this was something that could potentially affect them and there was a fear that if they were asked to change to an alternative grouping model they would not feel successful in meeting the needs in a mixed ability classroom. This helped me realized that our culture supports collaboration if we all agree with what we currently have in place. We do not have a culture that is open to evaluation of many current practices. This also made me realize that much of the respect I felt from peers was superficial and that my relationships with colleagues weren't strong enough to engage in discussions about differing teaching practices and philosophies.
As I continue my journey towards being a teacher leader I want to continue developing strong relationships with more and more of my colleagues. I also want to work more closely with my administration to work towards improving our culture so that we can engage in difficult conversations of evaluation, problem solving, and implementing positive change. I have a great deal of learning left to do in the realm of becoming an effective teacher leader. I plan on reading several texts before the beginning of next year to assist me in the process. While I do not want to abandon the plan of evaluating and looking for alternative grouping models I want to be a strong teammate and work towards addressing the issues we identified from our staff surveys.
See Artifact 8
Artifact 11
I plan on read several texts to help me grow as a teacher leader at my school.
Artifact 12
Through our collaborations with our leadership and cross grade level teams we determined that a staff resource site would help with consistency in our school. We have added most of our pieced and will be ready to roll out the site to staff in the fall.
It is hard to identify the most valuable part of the TLI process because I felt I grew and became much more aware because of all portions of the TLI process. While I felt most successful in the do part if I think just about the part of implementing a new grouping model with my team teaching partner. However, the reflect portion of the process was probably the most valuable. Without the reflect portion I wouldn't have been aware of the perceptions, culture realities, and status of relationships I had with colleagues.