Conclusion

In conclusion, the discourse surrounding disability varies, encompassing various perspectives that shape societal perceptions and interactions. The Lay discourse which was one of the dominant discourses evident in 'Wonder', rooted in personal experiences and cultural norms, offered a diverse range of perspectives on disability, promoting inclusivity and understanding. On the other hand, social discourse which was dominant in 'Attitude' emphasized the impact of systemic barriers and advocates for equal rights and accessibility, challenging stigmas and fostering a more inclusive society.

Meanwhile, charity discourse, though at times are well-intentioned, can inadvertently perpetuate a patronizing narrative by framing disabled individuals as objects of pity, rather than empowered members of the community. And as seen in 'The Goonies' this discourse of disability referred to a perspective or approach that viewed Sloth as an object of pity, with his family focusing on his impairments rather than his abilities, in turn hiding him away from society. This perspective can sometimes perpetuate stereotypes and reinforce the idea that disabled people are dependent on the goodwill of others, rather than emphasizing their rights, autonomy, and inclusion in society.

By contrasting and synthesizing these discourses, we can move towards a more holistic understanding of disability. Recognizing the intersection of medical, social, and cultural factors, we as pre-service teachers can promote inclusivity, advocate for equal opportunities, and challenge discriminatory practices. Embracing the lived experiences of disabled individuals while dismantling societal barriers, we can work towards a future where disability is celebrated as an integral part of human diversity, fostering a truly inclusive and equitable society.

For the teacher in the classroom it is especially important to consider the influences of discourses on a child's identity when he or she has a disability (Neilsen, 2005). It is important to realise that the influence of a discourse can contribute to the development of an individuals identity (Middleton, 1993, as cited in Neilsen, 2005)