AI and Presidential Election Poll

by Stephen Sabludowsky
I've been very impressed with how powerful and accurate Generative Artificial Intelligence is when it comes to analyzing complex poll results and answering questions as if it had crafted the poll itself.

When I fed the latest New York Times/Siena poll results—pitting Donald Trump against Kamala Harris—into my Political Generative AI expert, the responses I received were incredibly insightful, almost as if the AI had designed the poll itself. To put it into terms from a well-known former reality TV star, "It's hired!"

Of course, my expert—whom I've nicknamed "PoliAI"—isn't flawless. Like all AI chatbots, it has its limitations and can make mistakes. You might not agree with its conclusions after reading the interview and analysis. Nevertheless, in my opinion, it went beyond my expectations.

Here's some background: I have been working with AI tools and training them for several years. Since the public launch of ChatGPT, I've been using these tools daily and have worked with almost all of them. Each tool has its unique strengths and weaknesses and can be temperamental. Understanding how to utilize their potential is crucial. With the specialized tools at my disposal, I decided to test PoliAI's expertise.

I focused on the swing state of Pennsylvania, while the poll also covered Michigan and another state. Pennsylvania has the most significant electoral votes at stake. Below is the link to the poll data I provided to PoliAI, followed by our interview. I've summarized and shortened the questions posed to PoliAI. [The linked document is a cross-tabulation from the August 2024 New York Times/Siena poll, specifically for the state of Pennsylvania. It is based on a survey of "likely voters" and was conducted among 693 likely voters in Pennsylvania between August 6 and 9, 2024​.]


SS: Issue: Discuss the demographic data and trends that would benefit Donald Trump

POLI AL:

The New York Times/Siena College poll of Pennsylvania likely voters provides valuable insights into the demographic groups where Donald Trump shows strength or could potentially gain ground. By focusing on these areas, the Trump campaign can develop targeted strategies to enhance support. Here's a detailed analysis based on the poll:

1. Age

2. Education

3. Race and Ethnicity

4. Region

5. Party Affiliation and Leaners

Overall Recommendations

By leveraging these insights, the Trump campaign can better position itself to maximize support across key demographic groups in Pennsylvania.

SS: Issue: Discuss the demographic data and trends that would benefit Kamala Harris


POLI AL:

Analyzing the New York Times/Siena College poll of Pennsylvania likely voters reveals several key voting trends and patterns that the Harris campaign can capitalize on. By focusing on the demographic groups where Kamala Harris shows strength or could potentially gain ground, the campaign can develop targeted strategies to enhance support. Here’s a detailed analysis:

1. Age

2. Education

3. Race and Ethnicity

4. Region

5. Party Affiliation and Leaners

Overall Recommendations

By leveraging these insights, the Harris campaign can build on its strengths and capitalize on opportunities to increase support across key demographic groups in Pennsylvania.

SS: 

Issue: The reproductive freedom/abortion issue

There is no mention of abortion or reproductive choice. Did the survey not poll that or is that not an important political issue in Pennsylvania?

POLI AL:

The New York Times/Siena College poll does indeed include data on abortion, indicating that it is an important political issue among Pennsylvania likely voters.

Abortion as a Key Issue:

Implications for the Harris Campaign:

In summary, abortion remains a critical issue in Pennsylvania, particularly among women, younger voters, and Democrats. The Harris campaign should continue to highlight her stance on reproductive rights to mobilize these key groups.

SS:

Issues rank among all the voters starting from most important to least important


POLI AL:

Here are the issues ranked by importance among Pennsylvania likely voters according to the New York Times/Siena College poll:

This ranking indicates that economic issues, immigration, and abortion are the most significant concerns among voters, while other issues like healthcare, climate change, and foreign policy are less prioritized​.

SS:

Discrepancy between rank for economy (including jobs and the stock market) at 21% inflation vs. the cost of living ranks at 4%?

POLI AL:

The discrepancy between the economy ranking as the most important issue at 21% and inflation and the cost of living ranking much lower at 4% suggests several potential insights about the priorities and perspectives of Pennsylvania voters:

1. Broad Concerns vs. Specific Issues

2. Perception of Economic Management

3. Voter Segmentation

4. Impact on Campaign Strategies

Conclusion

The ranking suggests that Pennsylvania voters are concerned about the economy in a broad sense, likely prioritizing long-term economic stability and growth over immediate issues like inflation. This could be indicative of a voter base that is more concerned with overarching economic management and policies than with the specific, short-term impacts of inflation.



SS:

Based upon candidate, how undecided voters rank the issues

POLI AL:

Based on the New York Times/Siena College poll, here is how the top issues rank for likely voters in Pennsylvania, separated by Trump, Harris, and undecided voters:

Trump Voters

Harris Voters

Undecided Voters

Analysis

This data provides insights into how each group prioritizes different issues, allowing campaigns to target their strategies effectively​ .

SS:

The importance of the Trump voters ranking character/competence of candidate at only 4% and no ranked among Harris voters 


POLI AL:

The absence of "character/competence of candidate" as a significant issue among Harris voters in the poll, despite the heavy focus on Trump's legal troubles and character-related controversies in recent years, could be due to several factors highlighted by the survey:

1. Prioritization of Policy Issues

2. Polarization and Entrenched Views

3. Issue Fatigue

4. Different Framing of the Election

Conclusion

The poll results suggest that Harris voters might be more driven by policy issues and the broader implications of governance, rather than character or competence concerns about Trump, which could be why "character/competence of candidate" does not rank as highly for them. This reflects a possible strategic focus on substantive issues over personal controversies, viewing them as more pressing or impactful for the future of the country.

SS:

Conclusions to draw based upon the ranking of the undecided voters

POLI AL:

Based on the ranking of issues among undecided voters in Pennsylvania, both the Trump and Harris campaigns have opportunities to attract this group, but the approach must be carefully tailored to the issues that matter most to them. Here's a detailed analysis:

Top Issues for Undecided Voters

Which Campaign Might Attract Undecided Voters?

1. Economic Focus

2. Immigration

3. Abortion

4. State of Democracy/Corruption

5. Character/Competence of Candidate

Conclusion

Both campaigns have potential pathways to attract undecided voters, but the Harris campaign might have a slight edge due to the importance of abortion, the state of democracy, and concerns about character and competence—issues that align more closely with her platform. However, Trump could still appeal to these voters by focusing heavily on the economy and immigration, where he traditionally has stronger support.

The key for both campaigns will be to carefully address these top concerns in a way that resonates with undecided voters' values and priorities. Harris needs to continue emphasizing social issues, democratic integrity, and steady leadership, while Trump should focus on economic achievements and strong immigration policies.

SS:

Percentage of the undecided voters compared to all likely voters

POLI AL:

In the New York Times/Siena College poll, 4% of likely voters in Pennsylvania are undecided​.

SS:

Ranked ten top campaign strategies Trump campaign should employ to attract the 4% of total likely voters


POLI AL:

Given the small percentage of undecided voters (4%) and the assumption that the Trump campaign can maintain its base, the primary focus should be on strategies to attract these undecided voters. Below are the top 10 strategies, ranked from most important to least important, that the Trump campaign should employ based on the demographic breakdowns, issues, education, and other factors identified earlier:

1. Emphasize Economic Strength and Job Creation

2. Tough Stance on Immigration

3. Focus on Crime and Law and Order

4. Appeal to Working-Class Voters Without a College Degree

5. Present as a Defender of Traditional American Values

6. Targeted Messaging to Suburban Women

7. Address Inflation and the Cost of Living

8. Promote Energy Independence

9. Character Framing: Strength and Competence

10. Engage with Independent and Moderate Voters

Conclusion

These strategies are designed to maximize Trump's appeal to undecided voters by focusing on their top concerns while reinforcing his strengths in areas like the economy, immigration, and traditional values. By tailoring messaging to specific demographics and issues, the Trump campaign can effectively target the small but crucial group of undecided voters in Pennsylvania.

SS:

Ranked ten top campaign strategies Trump campaign should employ to attract the 4% of total likely voters


POLI AL:

If the Harris campaign's primary focus is on acquiring the small percentage of undecided likely voters while maintaining the current base, the following top 10 strategies should be employed. These strategies are ranked from most important to least important, based on the demographic breakdowns, key issues, and other factors identified earlier:

1. Emphasize Abortion and Reproductive Rights

2. Address the Economy with a Focus on Working Families

3. Defend Democracy and Integrity in Government

4. Appeal to Young Voters and Millennials

5. Expand Healthcare Access and Affordability

6. Focus on Education and Childcare

7. Highlight Commitment to Climate Action

8. Emphasize Equality and Social Justice

9. Engage with Independent and Moderate Voters

10. Strengthen Outreach in Suburban and Rural Areas

Conclusion

To effectively attract the small percentage of undecided voters, the Harris campaign should concentrate on the most resonant issues, particularly reproductive rights, the economy, and the defense of democratic values. By addressing these issues with targeted, demographic-specific messaging, the campaign can expand its appeal while maintaining its solid base, increasing the likelihood of winning over undecided voters in Pennsylvania.

SS:

What is the demographic breakdown of the current undecided voters


POLI AL:

Here is the demographic breakdown of undecided voters in Pennsylvania based on the New York Times/Siena College poll:

1. Age

2. Education

3. Party Affiliation/Leaners

4. Race/Ethnicity

5. Region

These figures provide insight into the composition of undecided voters, highlighting that they are spread across various age groups, education levels, and regions, with a notable proportion being independents and people with no college degree​.

SS:

Based upon profile, the candidates’ advantages to attract the prime unlikely voter--age range of 18-44 years (14%), no college degree (9%), independents (5), white, hispanic or others (5%), city areas and suburbs (11%) 


Yes, your assessment is correct. The demographic profile of undecided voters with the most vote potential includes those aged 18-44 years, those without a college degree, independents, white, Hispanic, or other racial groups, and those from city areas and suburbs.

Candidate Edge Based on Current Preferences

Overall Edge

Based on the current voter preferences, Harris appears to have a slight overall edge with this undecided voter profile, particularly due to her strength among younger voters, minorities, and those in city areas and competitive suburbs. However, Trump could still attract undecided voters without a college degree, particularly in the 30-44 age range, by emphasizing his strengths in economic management and immigration policy.

Both campaigns need to carefully tailor their messaging to these key demographics to maximize their appeal among undecided voters.

SS:

A  200-word elevator pitch for Harris to attract the undecided voters based upon all issues discussed

SS:

A  200-word elevator pitch for Trump to attract the undecided voters based upon all issues discussed


POLI AL:

Here’s a 200-word elevator pitch tailored to undecided voters in Pennsylvania, advocating for Donald Trump, focusing on their key concerns and demographic profile:

As you decide your vote, consider who has delivered real results for the American people. Donald Trump built a strong economy once, and he’s ready to do it again. He understands that good jobs and low taxes are the foundation of a thriving middle class. Trump’s commitment to securing our borders protects American jobs and keeps our communities safe.

While others focus on rhetoric, Trump delivers on policies that matter to working families—like lowering taxes, reducing regulations, and boosting job creation. He’s a leader who stands up to the establishment, fights for your freedom, and defends your rights against overreach.

Trump knows the importance of law and order in our suburbs and cities. He will continue to protect your communities, ensuring they are safe places to live, work, and raise a family. While Kamala Harris focuses on divisive social issues, Trump is committed to the bread-and-butter economic policies that keep America strong and prosperous. If you want a future of economic growth, secure borders, and strong communities, Donald Trump is the leader who will prioritize your security, prosperity, and freedom.

POLI AL:

HARRIS PITCH FOR THE UNDECIDED VOTERS:

“As you consider your vote, think about who will best secure your future. Kamala Harris understands the struggles facing working families and young people. She’s committed to an economy that works for everyone—not just the wealthy. Her plans include job creation, raising wages, and making healthcare and education more affordable. Harris will protect your right to make personal decisions about your body, ensuring reproductive freedoms are upheld.

She’s focused on restoring integrity and trust in our democracy, fighting against corruption, and ensuring everyone’s voice is heard. Trump’s promises may sound appealing, but his track record shows an economy that favored the wealthy, and a disregard for democratic norms and personal freedoms. If you value a future of opportunity, fairness, and justice, Kamala Harris is the leader who will prioritize your needs, fight for your rights, and safeguard our democracy.”