Marking criteria/What the examiner is looking for:
A. Coherent body of works
At the highest level of achievement, the work forms a coherent body of work through effective communication of thematic or stylistic relationships across individual pieces. Stated intentions are consistently and effectively fulfilled through the selection and application of media, processes and techniques and the considered use of imagery.
B. Technical competence
At the highest level of achievement, the work demonstrates effective application and manipulation of media and materials to reach an assured level of technical competence in the chosen forms and the effective application and manipulation of the formal qualities.
C. Conceptual qualities
At the highest level of achievement, the work visually elaborates ideas, themes or concepts to a point of effective realization and demonstrates the subtle use of complex imagery, signs and/or symbols that result in effective communication of stated artistic intentions.
D. Curatorial practice (SL only)
At the highest level of achievement, the curatorial rationale fully justifies the selection and arrangement of the exhibited works, which are presented and arranged clearly, as appropriate to your stated intentions within the space made available to you.
D. Curatorial practice (HL only)
At the highest level of achievement, the curatorial rationale fully justifies the selection and arrangement of the exhibited works and effectively articulates the relationship between the artworks and the viewer within the space made available to the student.
The exhibition provides an assessment platform for both SL and HL students to showcase the final product of their art-making processes. It allows for the assessment of the observable qualities of technical resolution, the successful communication of ideas and the synthesis of form and function. It also provides students with the opportunity to demonstrate their discernment in determining the strongest works for the exhibition and how to best arrange these works to their best advantage and to make connections for the audience between works. Additionally, HL students need to articulate how they have considered possible relationships between the artworks exhibited and the viewer.
The following core syllabus areas are addressed in the exhibition assessment task.
Visual arts in context
Visual arts methods
Communicating visual arts
IB World Schools represent a diverse range of socio-economic circumstances and physical resources. A number of schools have semi-professional gallery spaces on campus, other schools make-do with school halls, gymnasiums or even classrooms to display student work. A small number of schools have even hired professional gallery or exhibition spaces to exhibit student work. It is important to recognize that this component of the course is not intended to assess the quality of the space provided for students in which to exhibit their work. Rather, students are assessed on:
It is appropriate, and most likely a necessity, for the teacher to be responsible for proportioning the available exhibition space among the students. The division of space should be equitable, but needs to also take into account such things as the size and scope of individual student work, the need for wall versus the need for floor (or plinth) space or access to power outlets. Exhibition spaces need not be self-contained. Satellite exhibitions might be necessary for students who have produced site-specific work, such as a mural elsewhere on the school campus.
However, once students have been assigned the space in which they will exhibit their work, it is crucial that they are given the responsibility for determining how they will arrange and display their work. This is an important aspect of the task.
There are two distinct stages to the exhibition task. Firstly, there is the physical exhibition, where you need to select your best works and arrange them so that they present a coherent exhibition. Secondly, you need to document your exhibition electronically to facilitate the process of moderation by which a moderator may view your exhibition to ensure that the way that it has been marked by your school is consistent with the standard set by the IB.
Your teacher will allocate a space for you to set up your exhibition. You will need to plan and decide how to best display your work so that it is shown to its best advantage and best communicates your intent to the audience. You need to consider which works need to be displayed in close proximity and which works need to be further apart. Do any of the works help convey your intentions better when they are displayed together?
(see structure image at the very bottom of this page)
A well-written curatorial statement is your chance to guide the way the audience perceives your exhibition. It represents an opportunity to communicate directly with viewers, and help them recognize your intent and purpose in your body of work, understand your point of view, and generate intrigue and curiosity about the body of work they are about to experience.
When writing the curatorial statement, it is good to keep some general guidelines in mind. The statement has a word limit. For SL students, it is 400 words. For HL students, it is 700 words. If you exceed this, parts of your statement will not be considered in your assessment.
It can be helpful to follow a basic structure:
For each artwork you submit, it should be supported by exhibition text that outlines the title, medium and size of the artwork. The exhibition text should also include a brief outline of the original intentions of the work (500 characters maximum—including spaces—per artwork). This can be presented in the following way.
When completed, these can be printed out and included in your exhibition to help your audience appreciate your work more fully.
Mounting printed exhibition text on foam core board can give your exhibition a professional feel.