Criterion A

myp 4&5

Criterion A

Strand 1

explain and justify the need for a solution to a problem for a client/target audience

Strand 2

construct a detailed research plan, which identifies and prioritizes the primary and secondary research needed to develop a solution to the problem independently

Strand 3

analyse a range of existing products that inspire a solution to the problem in detail

Strand 4

develop a detailed design brief, which summarizes the analysis of relevant research

Criterion B

Strand 1: Develops detailed design specifications, which explain the success criteria for the design of a solution based on the analysis of the research

Strand 2: Develops a range of feasible design ideas, using an appropriate medium(s) and detailed annotation, which can be correctly interpreted by others

Strand 3: Presents the chosen design and justifies fully and critically its selection with detailed reference to the design specification.

Strand 4: Develops accurate and detailed planning drawings/diagrams and outlines requirements for the creation of the chosen solution.

Criterion C

Strand 1: Constructs a detailed and logical plan, which describes the efficient use of time and resources, sufficient for peers to be able to follow to create the solution

Strand 2: Demonstrates excellent technical skills when making the solution.

Strand 3: Follows the plan to create the solution, which functions as intended and is presented appropriately

Strand 4: Fully justifies changes made to the chosen design and plan when making the solution.

Criterion D

Strand 1: Designs detailed and relevant testing methods, which generate data, to measure the success of the solution

Strand 2: Critically evaluates the success of the solution against the design specification based on authentic product testing

Strand 3: Explains how the solution could be improved

Strand 4: Explains the impact of the product on the client/target audience

Report abuse