I. CHOICE OF PRIOR ART; BEST AVAILABLE
II. RELIANCE UPON ABSTRACTS AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF A REJECTION
ORBITAL
Appellant did not challenge the Examiner’s use of machine translations of Isshiki, Kobayashi, and Schulte, thus waived any objection to their evidentiary value. See In re Orbital Tech. Corp., 603 Fed. Appx. 924, 930 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (Appellant waived claims it might have had related to machine translation by pursuing appeal on that record.).
III. DISTINCTION BETWEEN 35 U.S.C. 102 AND 103