My research addresses the mitigating role of local processes in the ecosystem responses to a changing environment.
The shift of species distributions already recorded [1,2,3] marks the triggering of changes predicted larger and more profound for the near future [4]. Facing the societal questioning raised by such predictions, the recent technological advances make the numerical approach a first-order tool to provide relevant and intelligible answers. Nonetheless, the modelling effort engaged in that perspective is facing the ecosystem characteristics and complexity [5]
In the concept of “integrative community”, Lortie et al. [6] highlighted the diverse degrees of inter-dependency among the processes structuring the communities and the ecosystems. The complex web of direct and indirect interactions within biotic communities, among them and with the abiotic environment, keeps a dark side which is, by definition, difficult to model. A second challenge was already introduced in the seminal paper of Watt [7] in which plants communities are described as “working mechanisms in a spatiotemporal mosaic”. The processes structuring the communities and the ecosystems vary in intensity and importance across space and time limiting our abilities to identify the links between pattern and processes.
Based on this acknowledgment, the scientific community is calling for more interdisciplinarity and synergy among the fields of environmental sciences for our insights in the understanding of processes to feed the mechanistic dimension of the modelling effort. As a re-discovery of the origins, the integrative approach is increasingly identified as a key development of ecology.
In this general framework, my research in plant community ecology aims to conciliate the integrative and multi-compartmental aspects of their functioning in the spatiotemporal mosaic they occupy. I aim primarily to contribute to better scrutiny and understanding of the mechanisms underlying the interactions among plants (competition, facilitation) and with their biotic (microorganism, soil fauna, herbivores) and abiotic (biogeochemical cycles, µ- meso-climate) environments. These interactions, but also their importance for the ecosystem functioning, vary in space and time. Field experiment (sensu Gotelli & Ellison [8], i.e. both manipulative and comparative designs), as the main bridge between observed patterns and mechanistic models [9] (Fig. 1a), becomes a crucial tool to address the mitigating role of local interactions and of their variations [10] which can represent major filter of the ecosystem responses to the changing environment [11](Fig. 1b).
My early career transliterates such ambition to embrace the integrative aspect of ecology. From a focus on plant communities, for their pivotal role in the matter and energy fluxes in the ecosystem, I extended my investigations to the multi-trophic and multi-compartment dimensions of the local processes. Moreover, I enlarged the temporal window of observation from the monthly monitoring of the processes to the multi-decadal dynamics of the communities. Through collaborations, also favoured by field experiment as an invitation to pluri-disciplinary, I aim to enlarge my own understanding of the ecosystem functioning and at integrating other approaches and methods in order to favour the dialog and synergy toward an actual pluri-disciplinary integration.
I developed my research in diverse systems (Fig.2) from sub-Antarctic isolated islands to the high Arctic tundra. In severe environments, mostly Alpine and Arctic systems, the constraints can accentuate structuring forces and reveal mechanisms. The prevalence of abiotic limiting factors can stress the environment-biotic community relationships and outline the mechanisms of interactions while the spatiotemporal heterogeneity can provide a range of conditions favourable to the expression of contrasted interactions. On the other hand, under more temperate conditions, from the Mediterranean forests to sub-Arctic tundra heath, the history of human pressure can be an invitation for a better consideration of the dynamic and multi-driver aspects of the ecosystem functioning.
Community theory drew in the last decades the main principles of the structure and dynamics of biotic communities [12]. Nonetheless, the context- and/or species-dependence of biotic interactions and community assemblages remains the common rule. A first aspect of my research aims to address the structuring role of these processes in plant communities. Learn more
Global Change Ecology has highlighted the joint effects of the multiple drivers of community structure and ecosystem functioning [32]. But the complexity of the interplay among the drivers challenges by itself our ability to address it. Another aspect of my research consists in contributing facing this challenge.
The shift of community ecology from taxonomic focuses to process-oriented perspective is a re-discovery of the integrative essence of Ecology. The bloom of plant-soil or plant-herbivore ecological fields are examples of the recent steps toward better integrative consideration for the different compartments of the ecosystem interacting at the local scale. My research follows a similar path. Learn more