Management Opposition, Strikes and Union Threat
I estimate management opposition to unions in terms of hiring discrimination with a large-scale field experiment in the German labor market. By sending 13,000 fictitious job applications, revealing union membership in the CV and pro-union sentiment via social media accounts, I provide evidence for hiring discrimination. Callback rates for union members decrease on average by 15%. Discrimination is strongest in the presence of a high sectoral share of union members and large firm size. I further explore variation in regional and sectoral strike intensity and find weak evidence that discrimination increases if a sector is exposed to an intense strike. Yet, strike activities account only for a minor extent of hiring discrimination. My results indicate that hiring discrimination can be explained by union threat effects. Sectors with low collective bargaining coverage have lower hiring discrimination and in the absence of collective agreements sectors are less likely to follow collective agreement wage setting. Taken together, these results provide the first large-scale experimental evidence of management opposition to labor unions.
Link to my Job Market Paper.
On average a union membership in the resume leads to a reduction in callbacks by 6 to 7 percentage points.
Sending 4,531 fictitious job applications, revealing union membership in the application and a pro-union sentiment via Twitter accounts.
On average liking and retweeting content of union Twitter accounts reduces callbacks by 3 percentage points.
Strong variation in discrimination between sectors.
Hiring discrimination is positively associated with the sectoral coverage of collective agreements.