p xvii: in the acronyms BS and BTW, "Back" should be "Bak"
p xvii and p 195: the correct meaning of acronym TASEP is "Totally Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process", not "Totally ASymmetric Exclusion Process"
p 41 (second-last line), p 42 (third and fourth lines): "Fokker-Plank" should be "Fokker-Planck"
p 46 (line above Eq. (1.199)) and several other occurrences: "momenta [of a distribution]" should be "moments"
p 64 (Eq. (1.312)): the right-hand side should have an extra-factor 1/2
p 109 (first line of Sec 2.8): "in this section" should be "in this chapter"
p 139 (two lines below Eq. (3.3)): "inflexion point" should be "inflection point"
p 164 (Sec 3.5.1, second line): "ground coffee paper, or cloth" should be "ground coffee, paper, or cloth"
p 169 (caption Fig. 3.10): "is active at time t." should be replaced by "is active at time t=0."
p 177 (above Eq.(3.154)): "close to the critical point" should be "at the critical point"
p 186 (below Eq. (4.3)): the exponent \nu_\parallel = 2 (not 1), therefore \nu_\perp = 1 (not 1/2)
p 189 (Sec 4.3, second line): "suitable order parameter" should be "suitable control parameter"
p 212: the whole third last paragraph, which gives the original references for the exact solution of the TASEP model should be rewritten as follows.
The exact solution of the TASEP model in one dimension can be found in the papers by G. Schütz and E. Domany, Phase transitions in an exactly soluble one-dimensional exclusion process, Journal of Statistical Physics , 72 (1993) 277–296, and by B. Derrida, M. R. Evans, V. Hakim, and V. Pasquier, Exact solution of a 1D asymmetric exclusion model using a matrix formulation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26 (1993) 1493–1517.
p 219 (caption Fig. 5.4): the greek letter "ζ" should be "z"
p 280 (7th line): "conserved case" should be replaced by "nonconserved case"
p 287: the quantity \Gamma is missing in the right-hand side of Eq. (6.66)
p 350 (second-last line): "Fredhoml" should be "Fredholm"
p 364: Eqs.(D.70) and (D.71) are correct but Eq.(D.71) is valid for any v, not only in the limit of vanishing drift.
p 374: in Eq. (G.17) there is a misprint on the left-hand side: the two terms in parentheses should be inverted.
p 406 (Appendix P): we use two different symbols for the unit vector in the vertical direction, \hat x_3 and \hat z.
p 408 (Eq. (P.15)): "v*" should be replaced by "u*"
Thanks to people who reported some errata: Joachim Krug, Miguel A.F. Sanjuan, Alessandro Santini.
Last update: 11 March 2025