Naoyuki Kajimoto, Kristie Miller and James Norton. (2021). "Modelling Temporal Assertions for Global Directional Eliminativists", Philosophers Imprint, 21-2, 1-16. Draft
Abstract: Global directional eliminativists deny that there is any global direction to time. This paper provides a way to understand everyday temporal assertions—assertions made outside the physics or metaphysics rooms, the truth of which appears to require that time has a global direction—on the assumption that global directional eliminativism is true.
Naoyuki Kajimoto, Kristie Miller and James Norton. (2020). "Primitive Directionality and Diachronic Grounding”, Acta Anlytica, 35, 195–211 Draft
Abstract: Eternalists believe that there is no ontological difference between the past, present and future. Thus, a challenge arises: in virtue of what does time have a direction? Some eternalists, Oaklander and Tegtmeier ) argue that the direction of time is primitive. A natural response to positing primitive directionality is the suspicion that said posit is too mysterious to do any explanatory work. The aim of this paper is to relieve primitive directionality of some of its mystery by offering a novel way to understand the phenomenon in terms of the recently popularised notion of grounding.
Takeshi Sakon, Naoyuki Kajimoto. (2012). "Has the Truthmaker Principle been Justifiably Restricted?", Kagaku-Tetsugaku, 45(2): 131-134.
Naoyuki Kajimoto. (2015). "A review of Takeshi Sakon’s The World enough for time", Tetsugaku-Ronso, 42:R5-8
Naoyuki Kajimoto. (2012). "On the Debate over the tense of truth between Mellor and Priest", Tetsugaku no Tankyu, 39: 61-75
Naoyuki Kajimoto. (2012). "Can the truth-conditions of tensed sentences be given in a tenseless language? : Smith vs Oaklander", Prospectus, 14: 22-33
Naoyuki Kajimoto. (2011). "A review of Barry Dainton’s Time and Space, 2nd ed.", Tetsugaku-Ronso , 38(supplementary volume): S121 – S124