Miguel De Jesus
Assistant Professor of Finance, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Research Interests
My current research focuses on the role of information in financial markets.
Miguel De Jesus
Assistant Professor of Finance, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Research Interests
My current research focuses on the role of information in financial markets.
Published papers
Blanco, Ivan, Miguel De Jesus, and Alvaro Remesal. "Overlapping momentum portfolios." Journal of Empirical Finance 72 (2023): 1-22.
Best Paper of the Conference (Finance Forum 2022)
Different momentum investors use different formation periods to evaluate past stock performance. We explore the consequences of this diversity by studying the stocks that are the likely constituents of the portfolios of the heterogeneous momentum investors that coexist in practice. We show that stocks in the intersection of the 6 and 12-month momentum portfolios—“overlapping” momentum stocks—display enhanced medium-term return momentum. This finding is robust to considering a broad set of risk factors, transaction costs, and alternative explanations. Focusing on overlapping momentum stocks improves the returns of several momentum-based strategies proposed in the literature. The results are in line with the concurrence of trades by heterogeneous momentum investors exacerbating return continuation.
Conference: Finance Forum 2022
Working papers
Technological Transition Frictions and Price Discovery: Evidence from the SEC’s HTTPS Mandate (joint with Ariadna Dumitrescu)
2021 BME Award to the Best Paper on Stock Markets (Finance Forum 2021)
The increasing integration of modern information technologies into policies promoting market efficiency raises persistent concerns about the technological transition costs they impose on market participants. This study provides novel direct evidence of the existence of such costs and causally identifies their consequences for price discovery. Our unique empirical setting is the Securities and Exchange Commission's 2016 adoption of a more secure data communication protocol for its online repository of corporate disclosures. During the first year of implementation, some users failed to adapt to the new protocol, which prevented them from accessing electronic filings and disrupted the processing of company disclosures. We show that these technological frictions reduced price informativeness for firms publishing new reports, consistent with the idea that higher information acquisition costs diverted resources necessary for interpreting the filings. Supporting this mechanism, we demonstrate that transition costs also undermined informed trading activity. We further explore heterogeneity and find that the negative impact of technological barriers is less pronounced when users were more sophisticated, when firms concurrently announced earnings, and when reports were less complex. Our results highlight that technological transition frictions are a first-order concern for policymakers and underscore the critical need to manage them within regulatory frameworks.
Conferences: AFFI 2021, Finance Forum 2021, FMA 2021, WFBS 2021, EFMA 2022, FMA Europe 2022, Finance Forum 2023, EFMA 2023
The News-Reading Channel of Cross-firm Information Transmission: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
News about one firm can contain relevant information for another. Investors' trades incorporate this information into the second firm's stock price, either after reading about the news or following the first firm's stock price movements. In this study, I provide novel causal evidence for the news-reading channel. Using information on all users accessing the Securities and Exchange Commission's online repository of company reports, I show that information frictions facing common information acquirers---users who request a new disclosure by one firm and have previously sought a disclosure by another---impair the explanatory power of the first firm's returns for those of the second. For identification, I leverage a policy that triggered unsuccessful requests to the electronic archive as a plausible source of exogenous information frictions. I show that while having more common information acquirers is associated with stronger information flows, greater exposure of these users to failed requests due to the policy attenuates the positive relationship. The findings highlight the role of news acquisition for cross-firm information transmission and suggest that, despite the prevalence of trend-following investment strategies, policies facilitating the widespread availability of company information can enhance information spillovers and, consequently, market efficiency.
Conferences: Finance Forum 2024
Older working papers
This study brings to light the new empirical fact that flows into US domestic equity mutual funds are less sensitive to past fund returns when the risk-free rate declines. In particular, a one-percentage-point drop in interest rates is associated with a decrease in the slope of the flow-performance relationship of around 18%. I demonstrate through a model of portfolio allocation with endogenous information choice that this novel finding is consistent with more privately informed fund investors when rates fall. Specifically, a lower riskless rate diminishes the opportunity cost of acquiring costly private information about a mutual fund, which leads to flows that are less dependent on publicly-available information (i.e., past fund performance). I provide empirical evidence for the model's mechanism by exploiting the cross-sectional implication that the weakening of the link between flows and past performance is more pronounced when information barriers are higher. With a fund class' retail clientele as proxy for information costs, I obtain ample support for this prediction. I also find that, in line with more intense information acquisition, flows are more positively related to future changes in fund performance when rates are low, with this effect similarly being stronger for retail fund classes.
Conferences: EFMA 2018, FMA European Conference 2018, Foro de Finanzas 2019
In this study, I demonstrate that international mutual funds can cause temporary stock price deviations from fundamentals in the countries they have positions in. I show that US mutual funds massively sold their Mexican equity when the recent crisis was developing, which then led to the average undervaluation of Mexican stocks that were held by US funds (i.e., the exposed stocks). I establish that Mexican domestic funds responded to this underpricing heterogeneously; Mexican funds that owned the exposed stocks joined the US funds in selling, while those that did not bought the undervalued Mexican stocks. I provide evidence that these Mexican fund trades likewise had an impact on Mexican equity prices. Exposed stocks that were not in the portfolios of selling Mexican funds were in fact not subject to underpricing, while those that were were the ones driving the average undervaluation of all exposed stocks. This implies that the purchases by some Mexican funds were successful in counterbalancing the price pressure from US funds, while the sales by the others exacerbated the mispricing.
Conference: AEA Simposio 2017, EEA 2018