"Morphomes pose fatal problems for Item-and-Arrangement theories of morphology; Blocking effects are fatal for Item-and-Process and word-based theories." Discuss.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself, chs. 1-2 (pdf)
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Ana Luís. 2016. A view of the morphome debate (pdf)
Blevins, Jim. 2016. Inflectional paradigms (pdf)
Embick, David. 2016. On the distribution of stem alternants: Separation and its limits. (pdf)
Maiden, Martin. The ‘Autonomy’ of Morphology in Diachrony (pdf)
Nevins and Rodrigues 2012, Naturalness biases, morphomes, and the Romance first person singular (pdf)
Steriade, Donca. 2016. The morphome vs similarity-based syncretism: Latin t-stem derivatives (pdf)
Aronoff and Lindsay, Productivity, blocking, and lexicalization (pdf)
Blevins, Markedness and blocking in German declensional paradigms (pdf)
Carstairs-McCarthy section 8.4 (pdf)
Embick et al. 2021, blocking effects (pdf)
Embick, Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations (pdf)
Embick and Marantz, Architecture and blocking (pdf)
Jensen ch. 5 (pdf)
Kastner 2020, Blocking (pdf)
Kiparsky, Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms (pdf)
*Lieber 2009, ch. 10 (pdf)
Plag 2002 section 3.5.3 (pdf)
Poser, Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items (pdf)
*Rainer, Blocking (doc)