The shapes of meaning
How word meanings are visualized
References for poster presented at the Visual Language Conference at Tilburg University, 27-28 June 2024
How word meanings are visualized
References for poster presented at the Visual Language Conference at Tilburg University, 27-28 June 2024
Zwarts, J. (2024). The shapes of meaning: How word meanings are visualized. Ms. Utrecht University. pdf
[a] Stewart, A. H. (1976). Graphic representation of models in linguistic theory. Indiana University Press.
[b] Smessaert, H., & Demey, L. (2018). Towards a Typology of Diagrams in Linguistics. In P. Chapman, G. Stapleton, A. Moktefi, S. Perez-Kriz, & F. Bellucci (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (pp. 236–244). Springer International Publishing.
[c] Petricca, P. (2019). Graphs in Linguistics: Diagrammatic Features and Data Models. In Á. Nepomuceno-Fernández, L. Magnani, F. J. Salguero-Lamillar, C. Barés-Gómez, & M. Fontaine (Eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology (pp. 482–499). Springer International Publishing.
[d] Bubenhofer, N. (2020). Visuelle Linguistik: Zur Genese, Funktion und Kategorisierung von Diagrammen in der Sprachwissenschaft. De Gruyter.
[e] Börner, K. et al. (2019). Data visualization literacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 1857–1864.
[f] Richards, C., & Engelhardt, Y. (2020). The DNA of information design for charts and diagrams. Information Design Journal, 25(3), 277–292.
[g] Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. MIT Press.
[h] Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross‐linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 211–243). Erlbaum Associates.
[1] McKaughan, H. P., & Austerlitz, R. (1959). Semantic Components of Pronoun. WORD, 15(1), 101–109.
[2] Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2001). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press.
[3] Romney, A. K., & D’Andrade, R. G. (1964). Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 146–170.
[4] Jänicke, S., & Scheuermann, G. (2017). On the Visualization of Hierarchical Relations and Tree Structures with TagSpheres. In J.Braz et al. (Eds.), Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (pp. 199–219). Springer.
[5] Roberts, J. C. et al. (2018). Visualisation approaches for corpus linguistics: Towards visual integration of data-driven learning. 3rd Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities, 1–5.
[6] Löbner, S. (2013). Understanding Semantics. Taylor & Francis Group.
[7] Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of semantic categories. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge University Press.
[8] Geeraerts, D. et al. (1994). The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, Naming, and Context. Mouton de Gruyter.
[9] Löbner, S. (2013). Understanding Semantics. Taylor & Francis Group.
[10] Zwarts, J. (2023). Mining and mapping New Testament metaphors and the Louw-Nida lexicon. In S. Schulthess et al. (Eds.), New approaches to textual and image analysis of early Jewish and Christian studies (pp. 68–87). Brill.
[11] François, A. (2008). Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across language. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic assocations (pp. 163–215). John Benjamins.
[12] Löbner, S. (2021). Frames at the Interface of Language and Cognition. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7(1), 261–284.
[13] Majid, A., & van Staden, M. (2015). Can nomenclature for the body be explained by embodiment theories? Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(4), 570–594.
[14] Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
[15] Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
[16] Hamilton, W. L. et al. (2016). Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 1489–1501.
[17] van der Klis, M., Le Bruyn, B., & de Swart, H. (2022). A multilingual corpus study of the competition between past and perfect in narrative discourse. Journal of Linguistics, 58, 423–457.
[18] Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press.