Current

Pierre de Vries researches the intersection of information technology and government policy. His current work focuses on maximizing the value of radio operation by improving the resolution of interference conflicts. Previous projects have included regulatory paradigms for the internet/web, alternative conceptual models for wireless policy, spectrum allocation in the TV white spaces, and the impact of intangibility on decision-making in the digital world. (curriculum vitae, short bio).
Contact: pierredv at hotmail dotcom

Recent work (2013-15)

The FCC Technological Advisory Council published "A Quick Introduction to Risk-Informed Interference Assessment" (pdf) on 1 April 2015; I was the lead author.
Tyler Cox has posted two risk-related working papers to SSRN: "Instances of Worst-Case Scenario Based Analysis Pushback by the FCC" (http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2559816) and "Piloting Risk-Informed Interference Assessment Using Waivers" (http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2543632).

I have summarized my conclusions about risk assessment in spectrum policy in a short working paper, "
An Outline of Risk-Informed Interference Assessment" (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2564213).
My paper The Wi-Fi “congestion crisis”: Regulatory criteria for assessing spectrum congestion claims with Ljiljana Simić, Andreas Achtzehn, Marina Petrova, and Petri Mähönen was published in Telecom Policy on September 16, 2014 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.06.005).
I had two papers at TPRC this year (September 13, 2014):
I filed comments on July 14, 2014 (corrected on July 29) and reply comments on August 15, 2014 on the FCC's Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the 3.5 GHz proceeding (WT Docket No. 12-354) .
Laura Littman and I wrote a working paper on "The Use of Statistical Risk Assessment by the FCC in Spectrum Regulation" (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2418504).
An FCC TAC working group I participated in published a Recommended Charter entitled "Multi-stakeholder Organization to Develop Interference Limits Policieson June 17, 2014; the lead author was Doug Brake.
An FCC TAC working group I participated in published a White Paper entitled "Introduction to Interference Resolution, Enforcement and Radio Noise" on June 10, 2014; the lead author was Dale Hatfield.

I gave a talk ("Breaking the spell of Command and Control: Three spectrum reforms to maximize wireless value", video, slides, interview) at the Johannesberg Summit 2014 (program, YouTube channel) in Stockholm on 12 May 2014.
Phil Weiser and I presented a paper (pdf, web page; see http://bit.ly/unlockingspectrum for all resources) on "Unlocking Spectrum Value through Improved Allocation, Assignment and Adjudication of Spectrum Rights" at a Hamilton Project event at Brookings on 24 March 2014. Documents, briefs, backgrounders and video are available on the event page. My eight minute presentation of the ideas starts at 3:04 in the video; for a quick read, I recommend the policy brief (pdf). 
The FCC Technological Advisory Council published "Interference Limits Policy and Harm Claim Thresholds: An Introduction" (pdf) on 5 March 2014; I was the principal author.

"A Study on the Design Space for Harm Claim Thresholds" (pdf), a paper with Janne Riihijarvi, Andreas Achtzehn and Petri Mahonen of the Institute for Networked Systems, RWTH Aachen University has been accepted for CrownCom 2014. It studies the statistics of data collected by drive tests to support the derivation of harm claim threshold levels.
Here's an introduction to harm claim thresholds and interference limits: http://sdrv.ms/1impAKx (6 pages, first version January 2014).

I presented a paper on September 28, 2013 at TPRC41 with colleagues at RWTH Aachen (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2241609) about Wi-Fi congestion. Some replies to the resulting critique are at http://bit.ly/EmperorQA. We found little hard engineering evidence in the literature that Wi-Fi congestion is a pervasive problem; and there are dueling anecdotes in the trade press. Defining congestion is problematic, and we propose criteria based on user experience and economic considerations to judge claims of congestion. We do not claim that the absence of evidence of congestion amounts to evidence for the absence of congestion. However, we question the argument that congestion occurring somewhere, sometimes is a justification for regulatory intervention.
My paper "Optimizing receiver performance using harm claim thresholds" has been published in Telecommunications Policy: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.04.008. It's part of the TPRC 2012 special issue.

The Wireless Spectrum Research and Development (WSRD) group held its Workshop IV at MIT on April 23-24, 2013. I participated in a panel 2.3; my slides are online (pdf) and my presentation starts at time code 0:50 in the webcast.

I filed reply comments on the 3550-3650 MHz NPRM (proceeding 12-354) on 5 April 2013.

I filed comments on the FCC's proposed new rules for the 3550-3650 MHz band (proceeding 12-354) on 20 February 2013. For a summary, see this blog post.

The FCC TAC white paper "Interference Limits Policy: The use of harm claim thresholds to improve the interference tolerance of wireless systems"  (Version 1.0, February 6, 2013; pdf) has been published on the TAC web site. The paper was written by the TAC's Receivers and Spectrum Working Group; I was the principal author. The FCC published a public notice requesting comment on this report on April 22, 2013 (document DA 13-801, ET Docket No. 13-101).


Earlier work (2005-2012)


Service
TPRC board member (2013-)
TPRC program committee chair (2011, 2012)
DySPAN 2011 policy program committee co-chair
Northwest Vipassana Association board member (2010-2014), treasurer (2012-2014)
Bread for the World board member (2004-2010)
Seattle Center on Contemporary Art board member, treasurer (approx. 1999-2002)