Centre for Economic Performance
London School of Economics
London WC2A 2AE
Phone (Office): +44 (0)20 7955 7801
Phone (Mobile): +44 (0)75 4587 1723
|I am a PhD candidate, and Fellow, at the London School of Economics. My research focusses on the intersection of Environmental and Development Economics with topics in Labour, Productivity, and Trade. My research statement can be found here.|
I am on the academic job market this year and will be available for interviews at the Spanish Economic Association Annual Meeting (Girona, Dec 10-12th 2015), the American Economic Association Annual Meeting (San Francisco, Jan 3-5th 2016) and the Royal Economic Society Job Market Meeting (London, Jan 8-9th 2016).
- Environmental Economics,
- Growth and Development,
- Labour Economics,
- Productivity and Innovation,
- Public Policy.
- Winner of the FEEM Award 2013 (Young Economist Prize awarded by the European Economic Association).
[one page summary]
Abstract: To what degree can the movement of workers across sectors mitigate the economic consequences of weather-driven agricultural productivity shocks? Combining worker-level, firm-level and district-level data with high-resolution meteorological data, I examine the effects of weather on economic activity in India. I estimate that increases in temperature are associated with a reduction in agricultural production, but that prices do not respond, consistent with a "law of one price". Consequently, I find that workers are able to manage reductions in agricultural labour demand by moving into the manufacturing sector, highlighting the importance of market integration and diversification. Having established this, I examine the effects of labour reallocation on economic outcomes in the formal manufacturing sector. I find that workers move into casual manufacturing activities, with a corresponding decrease in the average wage of casual workers, suggesting that workers face little impediment in the movement across sectors within casual tasks. More surprisingly, this reallocation also results in (a) an increase in manufacturing productivity, (b) the average wage of permanent manufacturing workers, and (c) an increase in the number of items that the firm produces -- a restructuring of production. Counterfactual estimates suggest that the reallocation of labour across sectors could significantly offset the economic losses of weather-driven agricultural productivity shocks.
Other Completed Papers:
Abstract: When agents are unable to smooth consumption and have distorted beliefs about the likelihood of future income realisations, uncertainty about future states of the world has a direct effect on individual welfare. However, separating the effects of uncertainty from realised events and identifying the welfare effects of uncertainty both present a number of empirical challenges. Combining individual-level panel data from rural and urban Ethiopia with high-resolution meteorological data, we estimate the empirical relevance of uncertainty on objective consumption and subjective well-being. While negative income shocks affect both objective consumption measures and subjective well-being, greater income uncertainty only has an affect on subjective well-being. A one standard deviation change in income uncertainty is equivalent to a one standard deviation change in realised consumption. These results indicate that the welfare gains from further consumption smoothing are substantially greater than estimates based solely on consumption fluctuations.
Uncertainty, Child Labour, and Human Capital Accumulation (New Version Forthcoming)
(FEEM Award Winner 2013)
Abstract: How does parental income uncertainty affect child labour and human capital investments in village economies? Theoretically the relationship between income uncertainty and human capital is ambiguous: on the one hand a precautionary response reduces investments in human capital and increase child labour; on the other hand a portfolio motive increases investments in human capital as households attempt to diversify their income streams. Consistent, with the precautionary channel I estimate that an increase in uncertainty at the time of the survey is associated with an increase in the number of hours children spend working on the farm, while reducing the time spent accumulating human capital. However, this response is not significant enough to affect enrolment in school indicating that households value educational investments. Consistent with this hypothesis I find that there is no effect of uncertainty on educational enrollment during the early stages of the life cycle when the portfolio response is weakest; however, I find that as children grow older the returns to education, and consequently diversification, increase strengtheing the portfolio motive and consequently increasing in the likelihood the children attend school.