Note to all users: Papers with links (pdfs) are available on the web.
Aitchison, J. 1994. Words in the Mind: an Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Blackwell, Oxford.
Allott, N. and Rubio Fernández, P. 2002. This paper fills a much-needed gap. In P. Afuta, A. El Ghali and F. Toussenel (eds.) The Proceedings of the Atelier des Den Linguistique. Universite Paris, Paris.
Anderson, J. 1980/2000. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. Fifth Edition. Worth Publishers, New York.
Anderson, R. and Ortony, A. 1975. On putting apples into bottles: a problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology 7: 167-180.
Ariel, M. 2002.The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 361-402. (PDF)
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 1995. Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context. Journal of Semantics 12: 69-108 (PDF)
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 2001 The semantics and pragmatics of metaphor. In P. Bouillon and F. Busa (eds.) The Language of Word Meaning. 262-289. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (PDF)
Atlas, J. 2005. Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and their Interface. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bach, K. 1994. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124-62. (PDF)
Bach, K. 1995. Standardization vs. Conventionalization. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 677-686.
Bach, K. 1995b/1998. Standardization revisited. In A. Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. Vol IV: 712-722. Routedge, London and New York. (PDF)
Bach, K. 1997. The semantics-pragmatics distinction: what it is and why it matters. Linguistische Berichte 8: 33-50. Special Issue on Pragmatics. (PDF)
Bach, K. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327-366. (PDF)
Bach, K. 2001. Speaking loosely: sentence nonliterality. In P. French and H. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Figurative Language vol 25: 249-263.. Blackwell Publishers. (PDF)
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Baddeley, A. 1978. The trouble with levels: a reexamination of Craik and Lockhart’s framework for memory research. Psychological Review 85 (3): 139-153.
Baddeley, A. 1997 (ed.) Human Memory: Theory and Practise. Psychology Press, Hove, UK
Barcelona, A. 2000 (ed.) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: a Cognitive Perspective. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
Barclay, J.R., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J, McCarrell, N.C., and Nitsch, K. 1974. Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 15: 667-679.
Barsalou, L.W. 1982. Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory and Cognition 10: 82-93. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11: 211-227. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1985. Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 629-654. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1987. The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.) Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. 101-140. Cambridge University Press, New York. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1989. Intraconcept similarity and its implications for interconcept similarity. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. 76-121. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1989. Systematicity and semantic ambiguity. In D. Gorfein (ed.) Resolving Semantic Ambiguity. 146-203. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Barsalou, L.W. 1990. Access and inference in categorization. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28: 268-271.
Barsalou, L.W. 1990. On the indistinguishablility of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In T.K. Srull and R.S: Wyer (eds.) Advances in Social Cognition. Volume II: Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences. 61-88. Lawernce Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1991. Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G. Bower (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovick. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1992. Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In A. Lehrer, E. Feder Kittay. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New essays in Semantica and Lexical Organization. 21-74. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, New Jersey. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1993. Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. Collins, S.E. Gathercole, and M.A. Conway (eds.) Theories of Memory. 29-101. Lawrence Erlbaum, London. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 577-660. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. and Bower, G. 1980. A priori determinants of a concept’s highly accessible information. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention. Montreal.
Barsalou, L.W. and Hale, C. 1993. Components of conceptual representation: from feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (eds.) Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis. 97-144. Academic Press, San Diego CA. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W. Salomon, K. and Wu, L. 1999. Perceptual simulation in conceptual tasks. In M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Vilcox (eds). Cultural, Typological and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics. The Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association. Vol. 3, 209-227. John Benhamin, Amsterdam. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W., and Sewell, D.R. 1985. Contrasting the representation of scripts and categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 646-665.1984. (PDF)
Barsalou, L.W., Medin, D. 1986. Concepts: fixed definitions or context-dependent representations? Cashier de Psychologie Cognitive 6: 187-202.
Barsalou, L.W., Sewel, D.R.. and Spindler, J.L. (ms) Flexibility and stability in concepts.
Barsalou, L.W., Yeh, W., Luka, B., Olseth, K., Mix, K. and Wu, L. 1993. Concepts and Meaning. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, K.E. McCullough, S. Kita, and D. Testen (eds.) Chicago Linguistics Society 29: Papers from the Parasession on Conceptual Representations. 23-61. University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago. (PDF)
Becker, A. 1997. Emergent and common features influence metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 12 (4): 243-259.
Benari, M. 2004. If it is different then how come it is similar? The impressions of sameness and difference experienced by readers of metaphoric language. Pragmatics and Cognition 12 (2): 351-373. (PDF)
Bezuidenhout, A. and Cutting, J.C. 2002. Literal meaning, minimal propositions and pragmatic processing. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 433-456. (PDF)
Bierwisch, M. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In M. Bierwisch and E. Lang (eds.) Dimensional Adjectives. 71-261. Springer-Verlag (?), Berlin.
Black, M. 1962 Models and Metaphors. Cornell UP, Ithaca NY.
Black, M. 1962. Metaphor. In M. Black. Models and Metaphors. 25-47. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York:
Black, M. 1979. How metaphors work: a reply to Donald Davidson. On sacks, S (ed) 1979. On Metaphor. 181-192. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Black, M. 1979. More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 19-43. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Blakemore, D. 2002. Linguistic Meaning and Relevance: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Blasko, D. 1999. On the tip of the iceberg: who understands what about metaphor? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1675-1683 (PDF)
Blasko, D. and Connine, C.M. 1993. Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Metaphor and Cognition 19(2): 295-308. (PDF)
Bloom, P. 2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Blutner, R. 1998. Lexical pragmatics. Journal of Semantics 15: 115-162. (PDF)
Blutner, R. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17: 189-216. (PDF)
Blutner, R. 2002. Lexical semantics and pragmatics. Linguistische Berichte 10: 27-58. (PDF)
Bock, J. and Clifton, Ch. 2000. The role of salience in conceptual combination. Memory and Cognition 28(8): 1378-1386.
Bock, K. and Brewer, W. 1980. Comprehension and memory of the literal and figurative meaning of proverbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 9 (1): 59-72.(PDF)
Bortfeld, H. McGlone, M. 2001. The continuum of metaphor processing. Metaphor and Symbol 16 (1&2) 75-86) (PDF)
Bowdle, B. and Gentner, D. 1999. Metaphor comprehension: from comparison to categorisation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fist Conference of The Cognitive Science Society, 90-95. (PDF)
Braisby, N. Franks, B. and Hampton, J. 1996. Essentialism, word use, and concepts. Cognition 59: 247-274. (PDF)
Brewer, W. 1977. Memory for the pragmatic implication of sentences. Memory and Cognition 5(6): 673-678.
Brown, S. and Craik, F. 2000. Encoding and Retrieval of Information. In E. Tulving and F. Craik (eds.) The Oxford Handbook on Memory. 93-107. Oxford University Press, New York.
Brugman, C. 1997. Polysemy. In J. Verschueren and J-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Ámsterdam.
Butler, K. 1995. Content, context and compositionality. Mind and Language 10, 3-24.
Cacciari, C. 1998. Why do we speak Metaphorically? Reflections in thought and language. In. A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari, R.W. Gibbs Jr. and M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. 119-157. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. 1991. Understanding idiomatic expressions: the contribution of word meanings. In G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. 217-240. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. 1994. Understanding figurative language. In Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 447-477. Academic Press.
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. 1995a. Imaging idiomatic expressions: literal or figurative meanings? In M. Everaert et al. (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. 43-56. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. 1995b. Understanding idioms: do visual images reflect figurative meanings. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 7 (3): 283-305.
Cacciari, C. and Levorato, M.C. 1989. How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language 16: 387-405.
Cacciari, C. and Levorato, M.C. 1998. The effect of semantic analysability of idioms in metalinguistic tasks. Metaphor and Symbol. 13(3): 159-177.
Cacciari, C., Levorato M.C. and Cicogna, P. 1997. Imagination at work: conceptual and linguistic creativity in children. In M. Ward. et al. (eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. 179-208. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Camac, M.K. and Glucksberg, S. 1984. Metaphors do not use associations between concepts, they are used to create them. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13: 443-455.
Camarazza, A. and Grober, E. 1976. Polysemy and the structure of the subjective lexicon. In: C. Rameh (ed.) Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics: Semantics: Theory and Application 181-206. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Cameron, L. and Deignan, A. 2003. Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18/3, 149-160.
Carruthers, P. and Boucher, J. eds. 1998. Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Carston, R. 1997. Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed. Linguistische Berichte 8, Special Issue on Pragmatics, 103-127. Also in 1996 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 61-88 (PDF)
Carston, R. 1999. The semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from relevance theory. In K. turner (ed.) The Sematics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View (CRiSPI 1). Elsevier Science. Also in UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 53-80.(PDF)
Carston, R. 2002a. Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carston, R. 2002b. Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17: 127-148. (PDF)
Carston, R. 2002c. Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning – more questions than answers. UCL Working Papers in Lingusitics 14: 83-105. (PDF)
Carston, R. 2004a. Explicature and semantics. In S. Davis and B. Gillon (eds.) Semantics: a Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. A previous version was published in 2000 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 1-44. (PDF)
Carston, R. 2004b. Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. (PDF)
Carston, R. 2004c. Truthconditional content and conversational implicature. In C. Bianchi (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. CSLI Publications.(PDF)
Carston, R. and Uchida, S. (eds.) 1998. Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Chiappe, D. & Kennedy, J. 1999. Aptness predicts preference for metaphors or similes, as well as recall bias. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6(4):668-676
Chiappe, D. 2000. Metaphor, modularity, and the evolution of conceptual integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3): 137-158 (PDF)
Clark, E. 1987. The principle of contrast. In B. MacWhinney (ed.) Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hillsdale: New Jersey.
Clark, E. and Clark, H. 1979. When Nouns Surface as Verbs. Language 55, 767-811.
Clark, H. 1983. Making sense of nonce sense. In G. Flores d’Arcais & R. Jarvella (Eds.). The Process of Understanding Language. 297-332. New York: Wiley.
Clark, H. 1991. Words, the world and their possibilities. In G. Lockhead & J, Pomerantz (eds.). The Perception of Structure: Essays in honor of Wendell Garner. 263-277. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. 1983. Understanding old words with new meanings. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 22, 591-608.
Cohen, J. Dunbar, K. and MacClelland, J. 1990. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 97: 332-361. (PDF)
Cohen, L.J. 1979/93. The semantics of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, 64-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Ortony, A. (ed.) 1993, 58-71.
Collins, A.M. and Loftus, E.F. 1975. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82: 407-428.
Colston, H. and Gibbs, R.W. 2002. Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol 17 (1): 57-80. (PDF)
Cooper, R. & Franks, B. 1996 The interation of concept combination in sense generation. In Cottrell, G. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 523-528. July. (PDF)
Copestake, A. and Briscoe, T. 1995. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12: 15-67. (PDF)
Coulmas, F. (ed.) 1981a. Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standarized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. Mouton Publishers, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Coulmas, F. 1981b. Idiomaticity as a problem of pragmatics. In H. Parret (ed.) Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. 139-151. John Benhamins, Amsterdam.
Coulson, S. and Van Petten, C. 2002. Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition 30 (6): 958-968(PDF)
Craik, F. 2002. Levels of processing: past, present … and future? Memory 10(5/6): 305-318 (PDF)
Craik, F. and Lockhart, R. 1972. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11: 671-684.
Craik, F. and Tulving, E. 1975. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104: 208-294
Cremark, L. and Craik, F. (eds.) 1979. Levels of Processing in Human Memory. Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Cruse, A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dascal, M. 1987. Defending literal meaning. Cognitive Science 11: 259-281
Dascal, M. 1989. On the roles of context and literal meaning in understanding. Cognitive Science 13: 253-257.
Davidson, D. 1967. Truth and meaning. Synthese 17, 304-323. Reprinted in
Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 17-36. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. 1977. What metaphors mean. In S. Sacks (ed.). On Metaphor. 29-45. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Davies, M. 1982. Idiom and metaphor. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83, 67–85
Davis, S. (ed.) 1991. Pragmatics: a Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis, S. and Brendan, G. 2004, Semantics: a Reader. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Deane, P. 1988. Polysemy and cognition. Lingua 75, 325-361.
Deignan, A. 1999. Corpus-based research into metaphor. in: L. Cameron and G. D. Low (Ed.) Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. NOTES (PDF)
Deignan, A. 1999. Linguistic Metaphors and Collocation in Non-literary Corpus
Data. Metaphor and Symbol, 14/1, 19-36. NOTES(PDF)
Deignan, A. 1999. Metaphorical polysemy and paradigmatic relations: A corpus study. Word, 50/3, 319-338.
Deignan, A. 2003. Metaphorical expressions and culture: an indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol, 18/4, 255-272.
Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.(PDF)
Deignan, A. and Potter, L. 2004. A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36/7, 1231-1252. NOTES (PDF)
Deignan, A. Forthcoming. The grammar of linguistic metaphors. in:A. Stefanowitsch and S. Gries (Ed.) Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 171). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ducrot, O, 1973, Le preuve et le dire, Paris, Mame
Ducrot, O. 1972, Dire et ne pas dire, Paris, Hermann.
Ducrot, O. 1980. Analyses pragmatiques. Communications 32:11-60.
Ducrot, O. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris, Minuit
Erickson, T. and Mattson, M. 1981. From words to meaning: a semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour Nº 20: 540-552.
Estes, Z. and Glucksberg, S. 1999. Relevance and Feature Accessibility in Combined Concepts. In M. Hahn & S.C. Stones. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 149-154. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
Estes, Z. and Glucksberg, S. 2000a. Interactive property attribution in concept combination. Memory and Cognition 28: 28-34.
Estes, Z. and Glucksberg, S. 2000b. Similarity and attribution in concept combination: reply to Wisniewski. Memory and Cognition 28: 39-40.
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-187. (PDF)
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. Basic Books. New York
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B. and Smith, S.M. 1992. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Application. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Flores d’Arcais, G. 1993. The comprehension and semantic interpretation of idioms. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi (eds.). Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation. 79-98. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. New York, Crowell.
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. 1998. Concepts: where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fodor, J. 2001. Language, thought and compositionality. Mind and Language 16, 1-15. (PDF)
Franks, B. 1995. Sense generation: a ‘quasi-classical’ approach to concepts and concept combination. Cognitive Science 19: 441-505. (PDF)
Franks, B. and Braisby, N. 1990. Sense generation or how to make a mental lexicon flexible. In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Galinsky, A. and Glucksberg, S. 2000. Inhibition of the literal: metaphors and idioms as judgmental primes. Social Cognition 18: 1 35-54.
Garrod, S. and Sanford, T. 1988. Thematic subjecthood and cognitive constrains on discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 519-534 (??)
Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7: 155-170. (PDF)
Gentner, D. 1989. The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical reasoning. 199-241. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (Reprinted in Knowledge acquisition and learning, 1993, 673-694). (PDF)
Gentner, D. and Bowdle, B. 2001. Convention, form and figurative processing. Metaphor and Symbol 16(3): 223-247.(PDF)
Gentner, D. and Wolff, P. 1997. Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 331-355. (PDF)
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P. and Boronat, C. 2001. Metaphor is like analogy. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. and Kokinov, B. (eds.) 2001. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. 199-253. Cambridge MA, MIT Press. (PDF)
Gernsbacher, M.A., Keysar, B., Robertson, R. and Werner, N. 2001. The role of suppression and enhancement in understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 45: 433-450. (PDF)
Gernsbacher, MA. and Robertson, R. 1999. The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. Journal of pragmatics 31: 1619-1630. (PDF)
Gibbs, R. 1991. Semantic analyzability in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34: 613-620.
Gibbs, R. 1992 Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review 99: 572-577 (PDF)
Gibbs, R. 1993. Process and Products in Making Sense of Tropes. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought.252-276. New York: C.U.P.
Gibbs, R. 1994a. The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gibbs, R. 1994b. Figurative Thought and Figurative Language. M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 411- 446. Academic Press, San Diego.
Gibbs, R. 1995. What’s Cognitive about Cognitive Linguistics? In E. H. Casad (ed.). Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics. 27-53. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
Gibbs, R. 1996. Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition 61: 309-319. (PDF)
Gibbs, R. 1998. The fight over metaphor in thought and language. In N. Katz,C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. 88-118. New York, Oxford University Press.
Gibbs, R. 1999a. Interpreting what the speaker say and implicate. Brain and Language 68: 466-485.
Gibbs, R. 1999b. Speaker's intuitions and pragmatic theory. Cognition 69: 355-359.
Gibbs, R. 1999c. Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.). 1999. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. 145-166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gibbs, R. 2001a. Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol. 16 (3 & 4): 317-333.(PDF)
Gibbs, R. 2001b. Proverbial themes we live by. Poetics 29: 167-188. (PDF)
Gibbs, R. 2002a. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34(4): 457-486. (PDF)
Gibbs, R. and Bogdonovich, J. 1999. Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol
Gibbs, R. and Moise, J. F. 1997. Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition 62: 51-74. (PDF)
Gibbs, R. and Tendahl, M. Forthcoming. Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: relevance theory and psycholinguistics. To appear in Mind and Language.
Gibbs, R., Bogdonovich, J., Sykes, J. and Barr, D. 1997 Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 141-154. (PDF)
Gibbs, R., Buchalter, D, Moise, J. and Farrar, W. 1993. Literal meaning and figurative meaning. Discourse Processes 16: 387-404.
Gibbs, R., Nayak, N., Bolton, J. and Keppel, M. 1989. Speaker’s assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory and Cognition 17(1): 58-68.
Gieger, O. and Ward, L. 1999. Metaphors and the mental Lexicon. Brain and Language 68: 192-198.
Gildea, P. and Glucksberg, S. 1983. On understanding metaphor: the role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 22: 577-590.
Gineste, M.D., Indurkhya, B. and Scart, V. 2000. Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol 15 (3): 117-135. (PDF)
Gineste, MD., Indurkya, B. and Scart, V. 1999. Emergence of figurative and non-figurative features in poetic metaphors. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Cognitive Science. 165-170. Waseda University, Tokio (PDF)
Giora, R. 1999. On the priority of salient meanings: Studies in literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919-929. (PDF)
Giora, R. and Fein, O. 1999 On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601-1618.(PDF)
Glass, A., Holyoak, K. and Santa, J. 1979. Cognition. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
Glucksberg, S. 1991. Beyond literal meanings: the psychology of allusion. Psychological science 2: 146-52.
Glucksberg, S. 2001. Beyond the literal. In S. Glucksberg. Understanding Figurative Language. Chapter 2. 16- 28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S. 2001. On the fate(s) of literal meanings. Paper presented at Workshop Towards an Experimental Pragmatics, Lyons, France.
Glucksberg, S. 2001. Understanding Figurative Language: from Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Glucksberg, S. and Cacciari, C. 1989. Contributions of word meanings to idiomatic meanings. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27(6): 531-531.
Glucksberg, S. and Estes, Z. 2000. Feature accessibility in conceptual combination: effects of context-induced relevance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7(3): 510-515. (PDF)
Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: beyond similarity. Psychological Review 1: 3-18. (PDF)
Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1993. How metaphors work. In A. Ortony. Metaphor and Thought. 401-424. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Glucksberg, S. and McGlone, M. 1999. When Love is not a journey: what metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1541-1558. (PDF)
Glucksberg, S. Brown, M.E and McGlone, M.S. 1993. Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idioms comprehension. Memory and Cognition 21(5): 711-719.
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P and Bookin, H.A. 1982. On understanding nonliteral speech: can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 21: 85-98.
Glucksberg, S., Keysar, B. and McGlone, M. 1992. Metaphor understanding and accessing conceptual schema: reply to Gibbs. Psychological Review 99: 578-581.(PDF)
Glucksberg, S., Kreuz, R. and Rho, S. 1986. Context can constrain lexical access: implications for models of language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12 (3): 323-335. (PDF)
Glucksberg, S., Manfredi, D. and McGlone, M. 1997. Metaphor comprehension: how metaphors create new categories. In T. Ward, S. Smith and J. Vaid (eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. 327-350. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. and Manfredy, D. 1997. Property Attribution in Metaphor comprehension. Memory and Language 36: 50-67.
Glucksberg, S., Newsome, MR. and Goldvarg, Y. 2001 Inhibition of the literal: filtering metaphor–irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol 16(3/4): 277-293.(PDF)
Goatly, A. 1994. Register and the redemption of relevance theory. The case of metaphor. Pragmatics 4: 139-181.
Goldvarg, Y. and Glucksberg, S. 1998. Conceptual combinations: the role of similarity. Metaphor and symbol 13, 243-255
Goodman, N. 1972. Seven strictures on similarity. In N. Goodman. Problems and Projects. 22-32. Bobs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
Goosens, L., Pawels, P., Rudka-Ostyn, B., Simon-Vanderbergen, A:M. and Anparys, J.M. 1995. By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co.
Goswami, U. 2001. Analogical reasoning in children. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp. 437-470. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grady, J., Oakley, T. and Coulson, S. 2000. Blending and Metaphor. In G. Steen and R. Gibbs (eds) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. 101-124. John Benjamins, Philadelphia.
Gregory, ME. 1993. Metaphor comprehension : from literal truth to metaphoricity and back again. Metaphor and symbolic activity 8/1: 1-21.
Grice, H. P. 1967. Logic and conversation. William James Lectures, reprinted in Grice 1989.
Grice, H.P. 1975/1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard UP, Cambridge, MA.
Gross, S. 2001. Essays on Linguistic Context-Sensitivity and its Philosophical Significance. Routledge, London.
Gutt, E.A. 1991. Translation and Relevance. Blackwell, Oxford.
Hahn, U. and Chater, N. 1997. Concepts and similarity. In K. Lamberts and D. Shanks. Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. 43-93. Psychology Press. Have, UK
Hampton, J. 1997. Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In T. Ward, S. Smith and J. Vaid (eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. 83-110. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Hannon, B. and Craik, F. 2001. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55(3): 231-243.
Happé, F. 1993. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: a test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48: 101-119.
Happé, F. 1994. Understanding minds and metaphors: insights from the study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 275-295.
Hobbs, J. and Martin, P. 1987. Local Pragmatics, Proceedings, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence:520-23, Milan:
Honeck, R. and Kibler, C. 1985. Representation in cognitive psychological theories of figurative language. In W. Paprotte and R. Dirven (eds.) The Ubiquity of Metaphor. Current Issues in Lingusitic Theory. 381-423. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. 1993. Grammaticalization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Horn, L. 1984. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature,” in Schiffrin (1987:11-42).
Horn, L. 1992. The said and the unsaid. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of SALT II) 40:163-92.
Horn, L. 2000. From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening,” Journal of Pragmatics 32:289-326.
Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.). 2004. Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford, Blackwell.
Horsey, R. 2002. The art of chicken sexing. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 107-117.(PDF)
Inhoff, A.W. Lima, S.D. and Carroll, P.J. 1984. Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension. Memory and Cognition 12: 558-563.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Reason and Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Journal of Pragmatics 31. 1999 London, Elsevier. Special issue on literal and figurative language. (PDF)
Journal of Pragmatics 36. 2004. London, Elsevier. Special issue on metaphor (PDF)
Journal of Pragmatics 37. 2005. London, Elsevier. Special Issue on conceptual blending theory (PDF)
Katz, A. 1998a. Figure. In A. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. New York, Oxford University Press.
Katz, A. 1998b. Figurative language and figurative thought: a review.
In A. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. 3-87. New York, Oxford University Press.
Katz, A., Turner, M., Gibbs, R., and Cacciari, C. 1998. Counterpoint commentary. In . Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. 158-191. New York, Oxford University Press.
Keane, M. and Costello, F. 2001. Setting limits on analogy: why conceptual combination is not structural alignment. . In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp. 287-312. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(PDF)
Keysar, B. 1989. On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 375-385.
Keysar, B. 1994. Discourse Context Effects: Metaphorical and Literal Interpretations. Discourse Processes 18, pp. 247-269.
Keysar, B. and Bly, B. 1995. Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language 34: 89-109. (PDF)
Keysar, B. and Bly, B. 1999. Swimming against the current: do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1559-1578.(PDF)
Keysar, B. and Glucksberg, S. 1993 Metaphor and communication. Poetics today 13: 633-658.
Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S. and Horton, W. 2000. Conventional language: how metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language 43: 576-593. (PDF)
Kintsh, W. 2000. Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7(2): 257-266. (PDF)
Kittay, E. 1987. Metaphor: its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kittay, E. 1997. Of “men” and metaphors: Shakespeare, embodiment, and filing cabinets. In Ward, T. B. Et al. (eds.). 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. 375-402.Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Kittay, E. and Adrienne Lehrer (eds.) (1992), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ
Klein, D. and Murphy, G. 2001. The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language 45: 259-282. (PDF)
Lahav, R. 1989. Against compositionality: the case of adjectives, Philosophical Studies 55:111-129.
Lakoff, G. 1986. The meanings of literal. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 1: 291-296.
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), 202-251.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980 The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system Cognitive science 4, 195-208
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason: a Field Guide for Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: what Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lamberts, K. and Shanks, D. (eds.) 1997. Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. Psychology Press, Hove.
Lascarides, A. and Copestake, A.1998. Pragmatics and Word Meaning, Journal of Linguistics 34.2, pp387-414, Cambridge UP, Cambridge. (PDF)
Lascarides, A., Copestake, A. & Briscoe, T. 1996. Ambiguity and Coherence. Journal of Semantics, nº 13, pp. 41-65. (PDF)
Lasersohn, P. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75: 522-551. (PDF)
Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. 1999. Concepts and cognitive science. In Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (eds.) Concepts: Core Readings. 3-81. Cambridge MA, MIP Press
Leslie, A. 1987. Children’s understanding of the mental world. In Gregory, R. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to the Mind, 139‑142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Levinson, S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Levorato, M.C. 1993. The acquisition of idioms and the development of figurative competence. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi (eds.) Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation. 101-123. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Levorato, M.C. and Cacciari, C. 1992. Children’s comprehension and production of idioms: the role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language 19: 415-433.
Levorato, M.C. and Cacciari, C. 1995. The effects of Different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 60: 261-283. (PDF)
Levorato, M.C. and Cacciari, C. 1999. Idiom comprehension in children: are the effects of semantic analysability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 11 (1): 51-66.
Lewis, D. 1975. Languages and language. In K. Gunderson (ed.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, volume VII. University of Minnesota Press: 3-35.
Lewis, D. 1979/83 Scorekeeping in a language game. In D. Lewis 1983 Philosophical Papers. Volume I. 233–249. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Originally published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 1979. (PDF)
Lewis, D. 1983. Philosophical papers, volume I. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lockhart, R. 2002. Levels of processing, transfer appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding. Memory 10 (5/6): 397-403.(PDF)
Lockhart, R., Craik, F. & Jacoby, L. 1976. Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In Brown, J. (ed.) (1976) Recall and Recognition. 75-102. Wiley & Sons, London & New York.
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, volume 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
MacLeod, C. and Dunbar, K. 1988. Training and Stoop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14: 126-135.
(PDF)
Malgadi, R.G. and Johnson, M. 1976. Modifiers in metaphors: effects of constituent phrase similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 55: 95-107.
Margolis, E. and S. Laurence. 1998. Concepts: Core readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Markman, A. B., Yamauchi, T and Makin, V. S. 1997. The creation of new concepts: a multifaceted approach to category learning. In Ward et al. Creative Thought. Pp170-208.
Maruenda Bataller, Sergio. 2005. La pragmatica lexica y la negociacion del significado. Interlinguistica 15.
Maruenda Bataller, Sergio. 2005. Lexical pragmatics and negotiation of meaning. PhD thesis. University of Valencia.
Matos Amaral, P. 2000. Metaphor and Relevance. Philologie im Netz
McElree, B & Nordie, J. 1999. Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 (3): 486-494 (PDF)
McGlone, M.S. 1996. Conceptual metaphors and figurative language understanding: food for thought. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 544-465.
McGlone, M.S. 2001. Concepts as metaphors. In S. Glucksberg. Understanding Figurative Language: from Metaphors to Idioms. 90-107. Oxford University Press, Oxford
McGlone, M.S. and Manfredi, D. 2001. Topic-vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension. Memory and Cognition 29(8): 1209-1219. (PDF)
McGlone, M.S., Glucksberg, S. and Cacciari, C. 1994. Semantic productivity in idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes 17: 167-190.
Medin, Douglas. L., Ortony, Andrew, 1989. Psychological essentialism. In: Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 179-195.
Memory 2002. Vol 10 (5/6). Special issue on Levels of Processing.
Merlini Barbaresi, L. 2003. Complexity in Language and Text, Italy, Editore Plus.
Meyer, D.E. and Schvaneveldt, R.W. 1971. Facilitation in recognising pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90: 227-234.
Miller, G.. 1993. Images and Models, Similes and Metaphors. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 357–400. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mitake, A., M. A. Just, and P. Carpenter (1994). Working Memory Constraints on the Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity: Maintaining Multiple Interpretations in Neutral Contexts”. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, pp. 175-202.
Moon R. 1998a. Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: a Corpus-based Approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Moon, R. 1998b. Ambiguity, polysemy, and metaphor. In R. Moon. 1998. Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Moon, R. 1998c. Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in English in A. Cowie (ed.) Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. 79-100. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Morgan, J. L.: 1978, ‘Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts’, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, pp. 261–280.
Murphy, G. 1996. On metaphorical representation. Cognition 60: 173-204.
Murphy, G. 1997. Polysemy and the creation of novel word meanings. In T. Ward, S. Smith and J. Vaid. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. 235-265. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Murphy, G. 1997. Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition 62: 99-108. (PDF)
Murphy, G. 2002. The Big Book on Concepts. MIT Press
Murphy, G. and J. Andrew. 1993. The conceptual basis of antonymy and synonymy in adjectives. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 301-319. (PDF)
Neisser, U. (ed). 1987. Concepts and Conceptual Development, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Nicolle, S. & Clark, B. 1999. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 69, 337-354. (PDF)
Nogales, P. 1999. Metaphorically Speaking. CSLI/Cambridge University Press, Stanford.
Noh, E-J. 2000. Metarepresentation: A Relevance Theory Approach. Revised version of Noh (1998). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Noveck, I. A., Bianco, M. & Castry, A. 2001. The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1&2), 109-121. (PDF)
Nunberg, G. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
Nunberg, G. 1995. Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics 12, 109-132.
Nunberg, G., Sag, I. and Wasow, T. 1994. Idioms. Language 70 (3): 491-538.
Onifer, W. and Swinney, DA. 1981 Accessing lexical ambiguities ... sentence comprehension: effects of frequency of meaning and context bias. Memory and Cognition 9, 225-236
Onishi, K. and Gregory, M. 1993. Metaphoric reference: when metaphors are understood as easily as literal expressions. Memory and Cognition 21:6 763-772
Origgi G. & Sperber, D. 2000. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. To appear in P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (eds) Evolution and the human mind: Language, modularity and social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 140-169. (PDF)
Ortony, A. (ed.) 1993. Metaphor and Thought. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Ortony, A. 1979. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86: 1671-180.
Ortony, A. 1980. Some psycholinguistic aspects of metaphor. In Honeck, R.& Hoffman, R. (eds.) Cognition and Figurative Language. 69-86. New Jersey: Lawrence.
Ortony, A. 1984 Understanding figurative language In D Pearson (ed) Handbook of reading research 16, 417-441
Ortony, A. 1993. Metaphor, language and thought. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Second edition. New York: Cambridge University Press
Ortony, A., Schallert, D., Reynolds, R. and Antos, S. 1978. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 17: 465-477.
Paivio, A. (1990) Dual coding theory. In Paivio, A. Mental Representations: a Dual Coding Approach. Oxford Psychology Series 9. Oxford Science Publications: Oxford.
Papafragou, A. 1995. Metonymy and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 141-175. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1996a. Figurative language and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Language and Literature 5, 179-93.(PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1996b. On metonymy. Lingua 99: 169-195. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1998a. Experience and concept attainment: Some critical remarks. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 109-141. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1998b. Inference and word meaning: The case of modal auxiliaries. Lingua 105, 1-47. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier Science
Partee, B. 1995. Lexical semantics and compositionality. In L. Gleitman and M. Liberman (eds.) An Introduction to Cognitive Science, vol.1: LangaugeI, 311-360. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Peterson, P. and Burgess, C. 1993. Syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension: neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic dissociations. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation. 201-225. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Pilkington, A. 2000. Metaphor. Chapter 4 of. Pilkington, A. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory Perspective. 85-121. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory Perspective. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Pilkington, A. 1992. Poetic effects. Lingua 87, 29-51.
Pilkington, A. 1994. Poetic Thoughts and Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory
Account of the Literary Use of Rhetorical Tropes and Schemes. PhD thesis, University of London.
Pilkington, Adrian. 1990 A relevance theoretic view of metaphor. Parlance 2: 102-117.
Posner, M.I., and Snyder, C.R. 1975. Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (ed.) Information Processing and Cognition: the Loyola Symposium. 55-85. Lawerence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, J. 1998. Generativity and explanation in semantics: a reply to Fodor and Lepore. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 289-311.
Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B. 1995. Introduction: Lexical semantics in context. Journal of Semantics 12: 1-14.
Putnam, H. 1975. the meaning of “meaning”. In Mind, Language and Reality. Vol2. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: CUP.
Ratcliff, R & McKoon, G 1986 Automatic activation of episodic information in a semantic memory task. Journal of experimental Psychology: learning, memory and Cognition 12, 108-115 (PDF)
Ratcliff, R. and McKoon, G. 1981. Does activation really spread? Psychological Review 88: 454-462.
Ratneschwar, S., Barsalou, L.W., Pechmann, C. & Moore, M. 2001. Goal derived categories: The role of personal and situational goals in category representation. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 147-157. (PDF)
Ravin, Y. and C. Leacock. 2000. Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4, 295-329.
Recanati, F. 1995. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207-232.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2002. The limits of expressibility. In B. Smith (ed.) John Searle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2003. Contextualism: how far can we go? Chapter 9 of Recanati, F. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Recanati, F. 2003. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2001. What is said. Synthese 128: 75-91.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2002. Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind and Language 17 (1&2) 105-126 (PDF)
Reddy, M. 1979. The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and Thought. 224-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reimer, M. 1998. What is meant by “what is said”?: A reply to Cappelen and Lepore. Mind and Language 13, 598-604.
Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, London.
Riechmann, P. & Coste, E. 1980. Mental imagery and the comprehension of figurative language: is there a relationship? In R. Honeck & R. Hoffman. Cognition and Figurative Language. 183-200. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rips, Lance J., 1995. The current status of research on concept combination. Mind and Language 10: 72-104.
Rips, nce J. 1989. Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Voniadou & A. Ortony (eds.). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. 21-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritchie, D. 2003. Categories and similarities: a note on circularity. Metaphor and Symbol 18(1): 49-53.
Ritchie, D. 2004. Metaphors in Conversational Context: Toward a Connectivity Theory of Metaphor Interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 19: 265-287.(PDF)
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. 28-46. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Rosch. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories
Roth, E.M. & Shoben, E.J. 1983. The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 15 346-378.
Rubio Fernández, P. ¿? Understanding nominal metaphors: beyond class inclusion
Rubio Fernandez, P. 2001. Inhibition of core features in metaphor interpretation. RCEAL Working Papers, Cambridge, Research Centre in English and Applied Linguistics.(PDF)
Rubio Fernández, P. 2005. Cognitive Mechanism and Pragmatic Processes in Lexical Interpretation: the On-line Construction of Concepts. PhD Thesis. Cambridge University.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. 1997 Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metonymy. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6-2: 161-178.
Rumelhart, D. 1979/1993. Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 71-82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sadock, J. 1974. Distinguishing Use from Meaning. In Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. Academic Press, INC. New York 97-109
Sadock, J. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, pp. 281-297.
Sadock, J. M. 1972. Speech act idioms. In P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, and G. C. Phares (eds.). Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 329-339. University of Chicago, Chicago.
Sadock, J.M. 1993. Figurative speech and linguistics. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2 Ed.) 42-57. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sandford, 2002. Context, attention, and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language 17: 188-206 (PDF)
Sandford, A and Sturt, P. 2002. Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive sciences 6 (9): 382-386.(PDF)
Saussure, F. de. 1975. Course in General Linguistics, translated from the French (1916) by Wade Baskin. Peter Owen, London.
Schenider, W. and Chein, J. 2003. Controlled and automatic processing: behaviour, theory and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 27: 525-559.(PDF)
Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84: 1-66.
Searle, J. 1979a. Literal meaning. In J. Searle. Expression and Meaning. 117-136. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Searle, J. 1979b. Metaphor. In Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning. 137-161. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Searle, J. 1980. The background of meaning. In J. Searle et al. (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. 221-232. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Seuren, P. ?? Lexical meaning and metaphor. Cognition in Language Use. Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, 422-431
Shen, Y,. 1987. On the structure and understanding of poetic oxymoron. Poetics Today 8, 105-122.
Shen, Y. 1999. Principles of metaphor interpretation and the notion of ‘domain’: a proposal for a hybrid model. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1631-1653 (PDF)
Shiffrin, R.M., and Schneider, W. 1977. Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84: 127-190.
Shore, W. J. and V. Kempe. 1999. The Role of Sentence Context in Accessing Partial Knowledge of Word Meanings”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 28, Nº 2, pp. 145-163.
Smith, E. and Medin, D. 1981. Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Smith, L and Samuelson, L. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: category stability, variability and development. In K. Lamberts and D. Shanks (eds.) 1997. Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. 161-196. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B. and Finke, R.A. (eds.) 1995. The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Song, N.S. 1998. Metaphor and metonymy. In: Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications. Eds. R. Carston and S. Uchida. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87-104.
Sperber, D. 1982. Apparently irrational beliefs. In S. Lukes and M. Hollis (eds.) Rationality and Relativism. 149-180. Blackwell, Oxford.
Sperber, D. 1989. Lecture on Relevance and Word Meaning, Relevance Theory Workshop, University of Essex.
Sperber, D. 1990. The epidemiology of beliefs. In C. Fraser and G. Gaskell (eds.). The Social Psychological Study of Widespread Beliefs. 25-44. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Sperber, D. 1994a. The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. Hirschfield and S. Gelman (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. 39-67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sperber, D. 1994b. Understanding verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa. What is Intelligence? 179-198. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: a Naturalistic Approach. Blackwell, Oxford.
Sperber, D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language 12: 67-83. (PDF)
Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber Metarepresentations: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. 117-137. New York, Oxford University Press.(PDF)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1983. Draft of Relevance, chapter 8, ms. Department of Linguistics, University College London.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1987. Précis of Relevance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4): 697-710.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1990. Rhetoric and relevance. In J. Bender and D. Wellbery. The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. 140-155. Stanford University Press, Stanford.(PDF)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1991. Loose talk. In S. Davis (ed.) Pragmatics: a Reader. 540-549. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In P. Carruthers and J. Boucher (eds.) Thought and Language. 184-200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17(1/2): 3-23.(PDF)
Sperber, D. Forthcoming. Modularity and relevance: how can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? To appear in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence and S. Stich (eds.) The Innate Mind: Structure and Content. (PDF)
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. Forthcoming. Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. OUP, Oxford, 468-501(PDF)
Springer, K and Murphy GL. 1992. Feature availability in conceptual combination. Psychological Science 3: 111-117
Srull, T.K. and Wyer R.S. 1979. The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1660-1662.
Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S. (Ed.) Forthcoming. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 171). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sternberg, R. (ed.) 1999. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Strässler, J. 1982. Conclusions in Idioms in English: a Pragmatic Analysis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Stroop, J.P. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 643-662.
Sweetser, Eve 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: The Mind-Body Metaphor in Semenatic Structure and Semantic Change. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
Swinney, D. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re) consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 18: 645-659.(PDF)
Tabossi, P, Colombo, L & Job, R. 1987. Accessing lexical ambiguity: effects of context and dominance Psychological research 49, 161-167
Tabossi, P. 1988. Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of memory and language 27, 324-340
Tabossi, P. 1991. Understanding words in context. In: G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. 1-22. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
Tabossi, P. 1993. Processing Ambiguous Words in Context. Journal of Memory and Language, nº 32, pp. 359-372.
Tabossi, P. and Zardon, F. 1993. The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Structure, Processing and Interpretation. 145-162. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Tendahl, M. 2004. Cognitive effects and effort in a comprehensive theory of metaphor. Paper presented at Mind, Language and Metaphor conference. Granada, Spain
Thomson, D. and Tulving, E. 1970. Associative encoding and retrieval weak and strong cues. Journal of experimental psychology vol. 86:255-262.
Titone, D. and Connine, C. 1994. The comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(5): 1126-1138.
Titone, D. and Connine, C. 1999. On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 31(3): 1655-1674.(PDF)
Tourangeau, R. and Rips, L. 1991. Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 452-472.
Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. 1981. Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13: 27-55.
Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. 1982. Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition11: 203-244.
Traugott, EC 1985 “Conventional” and “dead” metaphors In W Paprotte, & driven (eds) The ubiquity of metaphor 17-56 Amsterdam, John Benhamins
Travis, C. 1985. On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187-229.
Tulving, E. 1979. Relations between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. Cermark and F. Craik (eds.) Levels of Processing in Human Memory. 405-428. Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Tulving, E. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford University Press, New York.
Tulving, E. 2001. Does memory encoding exists? In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & h. roediger (eds.) Perspectives on Human Memory and Cognitive Aging: Essays in Honour of Fergus Craik. 6-27. New York: Psychology Press.
Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. 1973. Encoding Specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 80: 352-373.
Turner, M. 1987. Death is the Mother of Beauty. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Turner, N. 1998. Figure. In N. Katz,C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. 44-87. New York, Oxford University Press.
Tvesky, A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Preview, 84: 327-352.
Unger, C. 1996. Proverbs and Relevance. Unpublished manuscript
Utsumi, A. 2005. The role of feature emergence in metaphor appreciation. Metaphor and Symbol 20 (3): 151-172.(PDF)
Valle-Tourangeau, Anthony et al 1998 Strategies for generating multiple instances of common and ad hoc categories
Van de Voort, M. and Vonk, W. 1995. You don’t die immediately when you kick and empty bucket: a processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristic of idioms. In M. Everaert et al. (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. 283-300. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Van Lancker, D. and Canter, G.J. 1981. Idiomatic versus literal interpretations of ditropically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24: 64-69.
Van Oostendorp, H. & de Mul, S. 1990. Moses beats Adam: a semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion. Acta psychologica 74: 35-46
van Rooy, R. 2001. Relevance of communicative acts. To appear in Proceedings of Tark 2001
van Rooy, R. 2000. Decision problems in pragmatics. Ms. ILLC, Amsterdam.
Veale, T. 1999. Pragmatic forces in metaphor use: the mechanism of blend recruitment in visual metaphors. In C. Nehaniv (ed.) Computation for Metaphors, Ananlogy, and Agents. 37-51. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Vega Moreno, R. 2001. Representing and processing idioms, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13.(PDF)
Vega Moreno, R. 2003. Relevance Theory and the construction of idiom meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 83-104.(PDF)
Vega Moreno, R. 2004. Metaphor interpretation and emergence. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 197-322.(PDF)
Vega Moreno, R. 2005. Idioms, transparency and pragmatic inference. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17
Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen, eds. (1997), Handbook of Pragmatics Online, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Vicente, B. 1992. Metaphor, meaning and comprehension. Pragmatics 2: 49-62.
Vicente, B. 1993. En torno a la semántica y la pragmática de la metáfora: una revisión crítica. Pragmalingüística, 1: 307-334.
Vicente, B. 1995. Mecanismos Semántico-Pragmáticos en el Análisis de la Metáfora. Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio de Publicaciones, País Vasco.
Vicente, B. 1995. Metaphoric Combinations and the Structure of Concepts”. In Memoriam HENRY SWEET. (pp. 183-190) A. Leon Sendra & V. Lopez Folgado (Eds.).Córdoba: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba.
Vicente, B. 1996. On the semantics and pragmatics of metaphor: coming full circle. Language and Literature 5: 195-208.
Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A. 1989. Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Ward, T., Smith, S. and Vaid, J. (eds.) 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structure and Processes. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Ward, T.B., Finke, R.A. & Smith, SM: 1995. Creativity and the Mind: Discovering the Genius Within. New York: Plenum. ?
Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., Finke, R.A. 1999 Creative Cognition, in Handbook of creativity, Sternberg, R.J., ed, Cambridge, U.K. : Cambridge University Press.(PDF)
Ward, Thomas. B., Smith, Steven. M. & Vaid, Jyotsna. 1997. Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought In
Ward, T. B. Et al. (eds.). 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Wasow, T., Sag, I. and Nunberg, G. 1983. Idioms: an interim report. In S. Hattori, K. Inoue (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguistics, Tokyo.
Wharton, T. 2004. Lexical acquisition and pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 323-342.
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. Routledge, London.
Wilson, D. 1995. Is there a maxim of truthfulness? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197-212. (PDF)
Wilson, D. 1996. Pragmatics. Entry in A. Kuper & J. Kuper (eds) The Social Science Encyclopedia 2nd Edition. Routledge, London: 661-2.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 1998. Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 57-74.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 1998. Linguistic structure and inferential communication. In B. Caron (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists. Elsevier Sciences, Oxford.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 1999. Relevance and Relevance Theory. Entry in R. Wilson & F. Keil (eds) MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 719-22.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (ed.) Metarepresentations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 411-448. Version (pdf) published in (1999) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 127-161(PDF)
Wilson, D. 2002. Relevance Theory: from the basics to the cutting edge. ICU Open lectures on cognitive pragmatics. ICU, Japan.
Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance Theory and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 15(2): 273-291. Special Issue on Pragmatics and the Lexicon. Reprinted in 2004 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (PDF)
Wilson, D. 2004-2005 Concepts. Philosophy of Language/Issues in Pragmatics lectures, Department of Linguistics, University College London.
Wilson, D. 2005. New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129- 1146. Ealier published in 2003 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 105-127. Download (PDF)
Wilson, D. and Matsui, T. 1998. Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 173-200.(PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90, 1-2. Special Issue on Relevance Theory, vol 2: 1-25. Version published in (1990) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 95-112 (PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1981. On Grice’s theory of conversation. In P. Werth (ed.) Conversation and Discourse. 155-178. Croom Helm, London.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1985. On choosing the context for utterance interpretation. In J. Allwood and E. Hjelmquist (ed.) Foregrounding Background. 51-64. Bokforlaget Doxa AB, Lund, Sweden.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1990. Outline of Relevance Theory. Hermes 5: 35-56.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998. Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In A. Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical concepts. Vol. II. Routledge, London: 262-289.(PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998. Pragmatics and time. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. John Benjamins: 1-22. (PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind 111: 583-632. Version (pdf) published in (2000) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 215- 254.(PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. Relevance Theory. In G. Ward and L. Horn (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 607-632. Longer earlier version (pdf) published in 2002 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 249-287 (PDF)
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan. 2005. Reply to Rajagopalan. Intercultural Pragmatics 1: 99-103.(PDF)
Wilson, Deirdre and Wharton, Tim. Forthcoming. Relevance and Prosody. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17(PDF)
Winner, 1988. The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1996. Construal and similarity in concept combination. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 434-45.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1997. Conceptual combination: possibilities and aesthetics. In T. Ward, S. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of conceptual structures and Processes. 51-81. Washington D.C.: Americal Psychological Association.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1997. When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4, 167-183
Wisniewski, E.J. and Love, B. 1998. Relations versus properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 177-202. (PDF)
Wisniewski, EJ. And Gentner, D. 1991. On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: minor and major adjustments to meaning. In G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland.
Wolff, P. and Gentner, D. 2000. Evidence for the role-neutral initial processing of metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26: 529-541.(PDF)
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wray, A. 2002. The Whole and the Parts. Chapter 1 in Wray Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Note to all users: Papers with links (underlined) are available on the web.
Neisser, U. (ed). 1987. Concepts and Conceptual Development, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Nicolle, S. & Clark, B. 1999. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 69, 337-354. (PDF)
Nogales, P. 1999. Metaphorically Speaking. CSLI/Cambridge University Press, Stanford.
Noh, E-J. 2000. Metarepresentation: A Relevance Theory Approach. Revised version of Noh (1998). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Noveck, I. A., Bianco, M. & Castry, A. 2001. The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1&2), 109-121. (PDF)
Nunberg, G. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
Nunberg, G. 1995. Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics 12, 109-132.
Nunberg, G., Sag, I. and Wasow, T. 1994. Idioms. Language 70 (3): 491-538.
Onifer, W. and Swinney, DA. 1981 Accessing lexical ambiguities ... sentence comprehension: effects of frequency of meaning and context bias. Memory and Cognition 9, 225-236
Onishi, K. and Gregory, M. 1993. Metaphoric reference: when metaphors are understood as easily as literal expressions. Memory and Cognition 21:6 763-772
Origgi G. & Sperber, D. 2000. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. To appear in P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (eds) Evolution and the human mind: Language, modularity and social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 140-169. (PDF)
Ortony, A. (ed.) 1993. Metaphor and Thought. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Ortony, A. 1979. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86: 1671-180.
Ortony, A. 1980. Some psycholinguistic aspects of metaphor. In Honeck, R.& Hoffman, R. (eds.) Cognition and Figurative Language. 69-86. New Jersey: Lawrence.
Ortony, A. 1984 Understanding figurative language In D Pearson (ed) Handbook of reading research 16, 417-441
Ortony, A. 1993. Metaphor, language and thought. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Second edition. New York: Cambridge University Press
Ortony, A., Schallert, D., Reynolds, R. and Antos, S. 1978. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 17: 465-477.
Paivio, A. (1990) Dual coding theory. In Paivio, A. Mental Representations: a Dual Coding Approach. Oxford Psychology Series 9. Oxford Science Publications: Oxford.
Papafragou, A. 1995. Metonymy and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 141-175. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1996a. Figurative language and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Language and Literature 5, 179-93.(PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1996b. On metonymy. Lingua 99: 169-195. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1998a. Experience and concept attainment: Some critical remarks. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 109-141. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 1998b. Inference and word meaning: The case of modal auxiliaries. Lingua 105, 1-47. (PDF)
Papafragou, A. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier Science
Partee, B. 1995. Lexical semantics and compositionality. In L. Gleitman and M. Liberman (eds.) An Introduction to Cognitive Science, vol.1: LangaugeI, 311-360. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Peterson, P. and Burgess, C. 1993. Syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension: neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic dissociations. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation. 201-225. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Pilkington, A. 2000. Metaphor. Chapter 4 of. Pilkington, A. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory Perspective. 85-121. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic Effects: a Relevance Theory Perspective. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Pilkington, A. 1992. Poetic effects. Lingua 87, 29-51.
Pilkington, A. 1994. Poetic Thoughts and Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory
Account of the Literary Use of Rhetorical Tropes and Schemes. PhD thesis, University of London.
Pilkington, Adrian. 1990 A relevance theoretic view of metaphor. Parlance 2: 102-117.
Posner, M.I., and Snyder, C.R. 1975. Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (ed.) Information Processing and Cognition: the Loyola Symposium. 55-85. Lawerence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, J. 1998. Generativity and explanation in semantics: a reply to Fodor and Lepore. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 289-311.
Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B. 1995. Introduction: Lexical semantics in context. Journal of Semantics 12: 1-14.
Putnam, H. 1975. the meaning of “meaning”. In Mind, Language and Reality. Vol2. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: CUP.
Ratcliff, R & McKoon, G 1986 Automatic activation of episodic information in a semantic memory task. Journal of experimental Psychology: learning, memory and Cognition 12, 108-115 (PDF)
Ratcliff, R. and McKoon, G. 1981. Does activation really spread? Psychological Review 88: 454-462.
Ratneschwar, S., Barsalou, L.W., Pechmann, C. & Moore, M. 2001. Goal derived categories: The role of personal and situational goals in category representation. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 147-157. (PDF)
Ravin, Y. and C. Leacock. 2000. Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4, 295-329.
Recanati, F. 1995. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207-232.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2002. The limits of expressibility. In B. Smith (ed.) John Searle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2003. Contextualism: how far can we go? Chapter 9 of Recanati, F. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Recanati, F. 2003. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2001. What is said. Synthese 128: 75-91.(PDF)
Recanati, F. 2002. Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind and Language 17 (1&2) 105-126 (PDF)
Reddy, M. 1979. The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and Thought. 224-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reimer, M. 1998. What is meant by “what is said”?: A reply to Cappelen and Lepore. Mind and Language 13, 598-604.
Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, London.
Riechmann, P. & Coste, E. 1980. Mental imagery and the comprehension of figurative language: is there a relationship? In R. Honeck & R. Hoffman. Cognition and Figurative Language. 183-200. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rips, Lance J., 1995. The current status of research on concept combination. Mind and Language 10: 72-104.
Rips, nce J. 1989. Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Voniadou & A. Ortony (eds.). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. 21-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritchie, D. 2003. Categories and similarities: a note on circularity. Metaphor and Symbol 18(1): 49-53.
Ritchie, D. 2004. Metaphors in Conversational Context: Toward a Connectivity Theory of Metaphor Interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 19: 265-287.(PDF)
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. 28-46. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Rosch. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories
Roth, E.M. & Shoben, E.J. 1983. The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 15 346-378.
Rubio Fernández, P. ¿? Understanding nominal metaphors: beyond class inclusion
Rubio Fernandez, P. 2001. Inhibition of core features in metaphor interpretation. RCEAL Working Papers, Cambridge, Research Centre in English and Applied Linguistics.(PDF)
Rubio Fernández, P. 2005. Cognitive Mechanism and Pragmatic Processes in Lexical Interpretation: the On-line Construction of Concepts. PhD Thesis. Cambridge University.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. 1997 Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metonymy. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6-2: 161-178.
Rumelhart, D. 1979/1993. Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. 71-82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sadock, J. 1974. Distinguishing Use from Meaning. In Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. Academic Press, INC. New York 97-109
Sadock, J. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, pp. 281-297.
Sadock, J. M. 1972. Speech act idioms. In P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, and G. C. Phares (eds.). Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 329-339. University of Chicago, Chicago.
Sadock, J.M. 1993. Figurative speech and linguistics. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2 Ed.) 42-57. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sandford, 2002. Context, attention, and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language 17: 188-206 (PDF)
Sandford, A and Sturt, P. 2002. Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive sciences 6 (9): 382-386.(PDF)
Saussure, F. de. 1975. Course in General Linguistics, translated from the French (1916) by Wade Baskin. Peter Owen, London.
Schenider, W. and Chein, J. 2003. Controlled and automatic processing: behaviour, theory and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 27: 525-559.(PDF)
Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84: 1-66.
Searle, J. 1979a. Literal meaning. In J. Searle. Expression and Meaning. 117-136. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Searle, J. 1979b. Metaphor. In Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning. 137-161. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Searle, J. 1980. The background of meaning. In J. Searle et al. (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. 221-232. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Seuren, P. ?? Lexical meaning and metaphor. Cognition in Language Use. Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, 422-431
Shen, Y,. 1987. On the structure and understanding of poetic oxymoron. Poetics Today 8, 105-122.
Shen, Y. 1999. Principles of metaphor interpretation and the notion of ‘domain’: a proposal for a hybrid model. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1631-1653 (PDF)
Shiffrin, R.M., and Schneider, W. 1977. Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84: 127-190.
Shore, W. J. and V. Kempe. 1999. The Role of Sentence Context in Accessing Partial Knowledge of Word Meanings”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 28, Nº 2, pp. 145-163.
Smith, E. and Medin, D. 1981. Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Smith, L and Samuelson, L. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: category stability, variability and development. In K. Lamberts and D. Shanks (eds.) 1997. Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. 161-196. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B. and Finke, R.A. (eds.) 1995. The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Song, N.S. 1998. Metaphor and metonymy. In: Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications. Eds. R. Carston and S. Uchida. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87-104.
Sperber, D. 1982. Apparently irrational beliefs. In S. Lukes and M. Hollis (eds.) Rationality and Relativism. 149-180. Blackwell, Oxford.
Sperber, D. 1989. Lecture on Relevance and Word Meaning, Relevance Theory Workshop, University of Essex.
Sperber, D. 1990. The epidemiology of beliefs. In C. Fraser and G. Gaskell (eds.). The Social Psychological Study of Widespread Beliefs. 25-44. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Sperber, D. 1994a. The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. Hirschfield and S. Gelman (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. 39-67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sperber, D. 1994b. Understanding verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa. What is Intelligence? 179-198. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: a Naturalistic Approach. Blackwell, Oxford.
Sperber, D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language 12: 67-83. (PDF)
Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber Metarepresentations: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. 117-137. New York, Oxford University Press.(PDF)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1983. Draft of Relevance, chapter 8, ms. Department of Linguistics, University College London.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1987. Précis of Relevance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4): 697-710.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1990. Rhetoric and relevance. In J. Bender and D. Wellbery. The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. 140-155. Stanford University Press, Stanford.(PDF)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1991. Loose talk. In S. Davis (ed.) Pragmatics: a Reader. 540-549. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In P. Carruthers and J. Boucher (eds.) Thought and Language. 184-200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.(PDF)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17(1/2): 3-23.(PDF)
Sperber, D. Forthcoming. Modularity and relevance: how can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? To appear in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence and S. Stich (eds.) The Innate Mind: Structure and Content. (PDF)
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. Forthcoming. Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. OUP, Oxford, 468-501(PDF)
Springer, K and Murphy GL. 1992. Feature availability in conceptual combination. Psychological Science 3: 111-117
Srull, T.K. and Wyer R.S. 1979. The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1660-1662.
Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S. (Ed.) Forthcoming. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 171). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sternberg, R. (ed.) 1999. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Strässler, J. 1982. Conclusions in Idioms in English: a Pragmatic Analysis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Stroop, J.P. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 643-662.
Sweetser, Eve 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: The Mind-Body Metaphor in Semenatic Structure and Semantic Change. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
Swinney, D. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re) consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 18: 645-659.(PDF)
Tabossi, P, Colombo, L & Job, R. 1987. Accessing lexical ambiguity: effects of context and dominance Psychological research 49, 161-167
Tabossi, P. 1988. Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of memory and language 27, 324-340
Tabossi, P. 1991. Understanding words in context. In: G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. 1-22. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
Tabossi, P. 1993. Processing Ambiguous Words in Context. Journal of Memory and Language, nº 32, pp. 359-372.
Tabossi, P. and Zardon, F. 1993. The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension. In C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi. (eds.) Idioms: Structure, Processing and Interpretation. 145-162. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Tendahl, M. 2004. Cognitive effects and effort in a comprehensive theory of metaphor. Paper presented at Mind, Language and Metaphor conference. Granada, Spain
Thomson, D. and Tulving, E. 1970. Associative encoding and retrieval weak and strong cues. Journal of experimental psychology vol. 86:255-262.
Titone, D. and Connine, C. 1994. The comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(5): 1126-1138.
Titone, D. and Connine, C. 1999. On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 31(3): 1655-1674.(PDF)
Tourangeau, R. and Rips, L. 1991. Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 452-472.
Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. 1981. Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13: 27-55.
Tourangeau, R. and Sternberg, R. 1982. Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition11: 203-244.
Traugott, EC 1985 “Conventional” and “dead” metaphors In W Paprotte, & driven (eds) The ubiquity of metaphor 17-56 Amsterdam, John Benhamins
Travis, C. 1985. On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187-229.
Tulving, E. 1979. Relations between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. Cermark and F. Craik (eds.) Levels of Processing in Human Memory. 405-428. Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Tulving, E. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford University Press, New York.
Tulving, E. 2001. Does memory encoding exists? In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & h. roediger (eds.) Perspectives on Human Memory and Cognitive Aging: Essays in Honour of Fergus Craik. 6-27. New York: Psychology Press.
Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. 1973. Encoding Specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 80: 352-373.
Turner, M. 1987. Death is the Mother of Beauty. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Turner, N. 1998. Figure. In N. Katz,C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, M. Turner. 1998. Figurative Language and Thought. 44-87. New York, Oxford University Press.
Tvesky, A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Preview, 84: 327-352.
Unger, C. 1996. Proverbs and Relevance. Unpublished manuscript
Utsumi, A. 2005. The role of feature emergence in metaphor appreciation. Metaphor and Symbol 20 (3): 151-172.(PDF)
Valle-Tourangeau, Anthony et al 1998 Strategies for generating multiple instances of common and ad hoc categories
Van de Voort, M. and Vonk, W. 1995. You don’t die immediately when you kick and empty bucket: a processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristic of idioms. In M. Everaert et al. (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. 283-300. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Van Lancker, D. and Canter, G.J. 1981. Idiomatic versus literal interpretations of ditropically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24: 64-69.
Van Oostendorp, H. & de Mul, S. 1990. Moses beats Adam: a semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion. Acta psychologica 74: 35-46
van Rooy, R. 2001. Relevance of communicative acts. To appear in Proceedings of Tark 2001
van Rooy, R. 2000. Decision problems in pragmatics. Ms. ILLC, Amsterdam.
Veale, T. 1999. Pragmatic forces in metaphor use: the mechanism of blend recruitment in visual metaphors. In C. Nehaniv (ed.) Computation for Metaphors, Ananlogy, and Agents. 37-51. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Vega Moreno, R. 2001. Representing and processing idioms, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13.(PDF)
Vega Moreno, R. 2003. Relevance Theory and the construction of idiom meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 83-104.(PDF)
Vega Moreno, R. 2004. Metaphor interpretation and emergence. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 197-322.(PDF)
Vega Moreno, R. 2005. Idioms, transparency and pragmatic inference. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17
Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen, eds. (1997), Handbook of Pragmatics Online, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Vicente, B. 1992. Metaphor, meaning and comprehension. Pragmatics 2: 49-62.
Vicente, B. 1993. En torno a la semántica y la pragmática de la metáfora: una revisión crítica. Pragmalingüística, 1: 307-334.
Vicente, B. 1995. Mecanismos Semántico-Pragmáticos en el Análisis de la Metáfora. Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio de Publicaciones, País Vasco.
Vicente, B. 1995. Metaphoric Combinations and the Structure of Concepts”. In Memoriam HENRY SWEET. (pp. 183-190) A. Leon Sendra & V. Lopez Folgado (Eds.).Córdoba: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba.
Vicente, B. 1996. On the semantics and pragmatics of metaphor: coming full circle. Language and Literature 5: 195-208.
Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A. 1989. Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Ward, T., Smith, S. and Vaid, J. (eds.) 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structure and Processes. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Ward, T.B., Finke, R.A. & Smith, SM: 1995. Creativity and the Mind: Discovering the Genius Within. New York: Plenum. ?
Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., Finke, R.A. 1999 Creative Cognition, in Handbook of creativity, Sternberg, R.J., ed, Cambridge, U.K. : Cambridge University Press.(PDF)
Ward, Thomas. B., Smith, Steven. M. & Vaid, Jyotsna. 1997. Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought In
Ward, T. B. Et al. (eds.). 1997. Creative Thought: an Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Wasow, T., Sag, I. and Nunberg, G. 1983. Idioms: an interim report. In S. Hattori, K. Inoue (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguistics, Tokyo.
Wharton, T. 2004. Lexical acquisition and pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 323-342.
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. Routledge, London.
Wilson, D. 1995. Is there a maxim of truthfulness? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197-212. (PDF)
Wilson, D. 1996. Pragmatics. Entry in A. Kuper & J. Kuper (eds) The Social Science Encyclopedia 2nd Edition. Routledge, London: 661-2.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 1998. Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 57-74.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 1998. Linguistic structure and inferential communication. In B. Caron (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists. Elsevier Sciences, Oxford.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 1999. Relevance and Relevance Theory. Entry in R. Wilson & F. Keil (eds) MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 719-22.(PDF)
Wilson, D. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (ed.) Metarepresentations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 411-448. Version (pdf) published in (1999) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 127-161(PDF)
Wilson, D. 2002. Relevance Theory: from the basics to the cutting edge. ICU Open lectures on cognitive pragmatics. ICU, Japan.
Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance Theory and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 15(2): 273-291. Special Issue on Pragmatics and the Lexicon. Reprinted in 2004 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (PDF)
Wilson, D. 2004-2005 Concepts. Philosophy of Language/Issues in Pragmatics lectures, Department of Linguistics, University College London.
Wilson, D. 2005. New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129- 1146. Ealier published in 2003 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 105-127. Download (PDF)
Wilson, D. and Matsui, T. 1998. Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 173-200.(PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90, 1-2. Special Issue on Relevance Theory, vol 2: 1-25. Version published in (1990) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 95-112 (PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1981. On Grice’s theory of conversation. In P. Werth (ed.) Conversation and Discourse. 155-178. Croom Helm, London.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1985. On choosing the context for utterance interpretation. In J. Allwood and E. Hjelmquist (ed.) Foregrounding Background. 51-64. Bokforlaget Doxa AB, Lund, Sweden.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1990. Outline of Relevance Theory. Hermes 5: 35-56.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998. Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In A. Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical concepts. Vol. II. Routledge, London: 262-289.(PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998. Pragmatics and time. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. John Benjamins: 1-22. (PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind 111: 583-632. Version (pdf) published in (2000) UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 215- 254.(PDF)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. Relevance Theory. In G. Ward and L. Horn (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 607-632. Longer earlier version (pdf) published in 2002 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 249-287 (PDF)
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan. 2005. Reply to Rajagopalan. Intercultural Pragmatics 1: 99-103.(PDF)
Wilson, Deirdre and Wharton, Tim. Forthcoming. Relevance and Prosody. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17(PDF)
Winner, 1988. The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1996. Construal and similarity in concept combination. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 434-45.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1997. Conceptual combination: possibilities and aesthetics. In T. Ward, S. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.) Creative Thought: an Investigation of conceptual structures and Processes. 51-81. Washington D.C.: Americal Psychological Association.
Wisniewski, E.J. 1997. When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4, 167-183
Wisniewski, E.J. and Love, B. 1998. Relations versus properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 177-202. (PDF)
Wisniewski, EJ. And Gentner, D. 1991. On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: minor and major adjustments to meaning. In G.B. Simpson (ed.) Understanding Word and Sentence. Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland.
Wolff, P. and Gentner, D. 2000. Evidence for the role-neutral initial processing of metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26: 529-541.(PDF)
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wray, A. 2002. The Whole and the Parts. Chapter 1 in Wray Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.