Past Meetings


May 7th, 2025 (11:30-12:30, Seminar Room)




April 8th, 2025 (14:00-15:00, Seminar Room)



March 6th,  2025 (15.00-16.00, Meeting Room 1)



February 3rd, 2025 (11.00-12.00, Seminar Room)



November 7th, 2024 (11:00-12:00, Auditorium, Piazza Scaravilli 2)


Abstract: 

The ethics and legalization of Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD)—the act of a person intentionally ending his or her life with help of a health-care practitioner—are a source of considerable debate in health policy and medicine. The legal status varies considerably across countries and circumstances. The variation in whether MAiD is legally permissible, even between countries that are similar in their culture and political systems, suggests that the voluntary termination of one’s life with the aid of a medical professional is a highly contentious issue. We study the relative importance that people assign to “economic” and non-economic factors, including ethical and moral factors. People weigh costs against benefits in many choice contexts and in their policy preferences; it remains uncertain, however, whether they are willing to do so in certain domains of health where “sacred values” that preclude trade‐offs may be concerned, including decisions involving life and death. We consider the impact of two different types of economic factors on support for MAiD. First, we study whether the impact of granting MAiD on public resources influences the degree to which individuals support it. Second, we investigate whether individuals weigh the impact of financial circumstances on the well-being of a patient seeking MAiD.



October 2nd,  2024 (11:00-12:00, Seminar Room, Piazza Scaravilli 2)


Jul. 1st (13:00 - 13:30, Seminar Room, Piazza Scaravilli 2)

In preparation for my ERC Consolidator interview which will be in September, I would like to present you my idea for a new online survey called “The IdealChild Database” which includes new ways of measuring parenting attitudes across countries. My overall ERC project is called HARSH - Uncovering the roots of harsh parenting.


Monday, Jun. 3rd, 2024 (13:00 - 14:00, Seminar Room, Piazza Scaravilli 2)


May 6th, 2024 (13:00 - 14:00, Seminar Room, Piazza Scaravilli 2)

Abstract:

     We analyse a threshold public goods game in which players have varying benefits from public goods provision, motivated by the existence of large heterogeneities between countries in international environmental cooperation. The setup chosen specifically allows for an analysis of the trade-off between efficiency and equity. We choose a preference specification allowing for a variety of other-regarding preferences and hypothesize that benefit symmetry among players facilitates coordination due to converging focal points of efficiency and equity. Increasing degrees of asymmetry lead to diverging focal points, rendering cooperation more difficult. Our theoretical predictions are supported by preliminary experimental evidence. We find that provision is most frequent when players are symmetric. While increasing the degree of asymmetry does not significantly hamper provision success, contributions become more volatile the more heterogeneous players are. Analysing how players share contribution costs, we see that the extent of asymmetry is not salient, leading to relatively constant burden-sharing across treatments despite varied levels of inequity.


Apr. 8th, 2024 (13:00 - 14:00, Seminar Room, Piazza Scaravilli 2)


Mar. 4th, 2024 (13:00 - 14:00, Seminar Room, Piazza Scaravilli 2)


Feb. 19th, 2024 (13:00 - 14:00, Meeting Room 1 in the basement of via San Giacomo building)


Jan. 24th, 2024 (16:00 - 17:00, the Auditorium)

Dec. 14th, 2023 (10:00 - 11:00, Seminar room)

Nov. 9th, 2023 (16:00 - 17:00, the Seminar room)

Oct. 12th, 2023 (10:00 – 11:00, the common room in the basement of San Giacomo building)

Sept. 21st, 2023 (10:00 – 11:00, Seminar room)


Jul. 12th, 2023 (14:15 – 15:15, Seminar room)

Jun. 7th, 2023 (14:15 - 15:15, Old Seminar room)

May 3rd, 2023 (14:15 – 15:15), the Old Seminar Room

We develop a theoretical model that maps the information from the tax schedule onto informative signals that taxpayers use to infer their position in the income distribution. 

Using panel data from the General Social Survey, we find evidence that changes in the US federal income tax system have influenced perceptions of income ranks over the past few decades. We show that the correlation between actual and perceived rank in the income distribution seems to disappear for individuals in the zero-tax bracket.

To establish causality, we conduct an online experiment on Amazon Mechanical Turk with American workers, where we randomly assign participants to either a proportional flat tax system or a progressive tax system with increasing marginal tax rates. Our results reveal statistically significant differences between the two tax systems in terms of participants' perceived income levels and probabilities of being above the average income level. Specifically, participants facing the progressive tax system perceive an average income level that is 12% higher and a probability of being above the average income level that is 25% lower compared to those in the control group, whereas those facing the proportional tax system show no significant differences.

We run a second experiment to test whether information about social benefits and tax credits can affect income perceptions when the marginal tax rate is zero (work in progress).

These findings suggest that the design of tax schemes can generate a bias in the perception of the income distribution, which may influence support for redistributive policies.

Mar. 8th, 2023 (14:15 – 15:15, New Seminar room in Piazza Scaravilli, 2)

Feb. 15th, 2023 (14:00 – 15:00, Basement room at via San Giacomo)

Dec. 5th, 2022 (14:00 – 15:00)

Nov. 7th, 2022 (14:00 - 15:00)

Oct. 10th, 2022 (16:00 - 17:00)

Jul. 4th, 2022 (12:00 – 13:00)

Jun. 6th, 2022 (12:00 - 13:00)

May 2nd, 2022 (1pm-2pm)

January 19th, 2022 (2pm-3pm)

December 15th, 2021 (4pm-4,30pm)


July 12, 2021 (12pm - 12,30 pm)

May 3, 2021 (12pm-1pm)

April 9, 2021 (3pm-4pm)

March 1, 2021 (9am-10am)

October 5, 2020 (12pm-12:30pm)

September 7, 2020 (12pm-1pm)

April 6, 2020 (11am-12pm)

March 23, 2020 (11:15am-12:15pm)

February 10, 2020 (11am-12pm)

June 3, 2019 (12pm-1pm)

May 6, 2019 (12pm-1pm)

April 15, 2019 (12pm-1pm)

April 1, 2019 (1pm-2pm)

February 4, 2019 (12:30pm-1:30pm)

January 7, 2019 (12:30pm-1:30pm)

December 11, 2018 (12pm-1pm)

November 6, 2018 (11:30pm-12:30pm)

October 9, 2018 (11:30pm-12:30pm)

June 11, 2018 (12:30pm-13:30pm)

May 14, 2018 (12:30pm-13:30pm)

April 9, 2018 (12:30pm-13:30pm)

March 12, 2018 (14:00pm-15:00pm)

February 5, 2018 (12:30pm-13:30pm)

November 27, 2017 (12:30pm-13:30pm)

October 30, 2017 (12:30pm-13:30pm)

June 9, 2017 (11:00am-12:00pm)

May 5, 2017 (11:00am-12:00pm)

April 7, 2017 (11:00am-12:00pm)

March 13, 2017 (12:00pm-13:00pm)

February 13, 2017 (12:30pm-13:30pm)

January 9, 2017 (12pm-1pm)

December 12, 2016 (12pm-1pm)

November 14, 2016 (12pm-1pm)

October 10, 2016 (12:30pm-1:30pm)

March 14, 2016 (12pm-1pm)

February 8, 2016 (12pm-1pm)

January 11, 2016 (12pm-1pm)

December 14, 2015 (12am-13pm)

November 9, 2015 (12am-13pm)

September 30, 2015 (11:30am-12:30pm)

May 28, 2015 (3:30-4:30 pm)

March 23, 2015 (11:00-12:00 am)

February 20, 2015 (10:00-11:00 am)

January 19, 2015 (11:00-12:00 am)

December 1, 2014 (1:00-2:00 pm)

November 10, 2014 (12:00-1:00 pm)

October 9, 2014 (11:00-12:00 am)

September 16, 2014 (3:30-4:30 pm)