Matrix illustrations of the International Organisation (HRM) Model of Managed Markets and the Human Energy Framework (HEF) incl. Schwartz’s* Global Cluster Case Studies.
Internationalisation of New Human Resources Management (nHRM) is coordinate with aggrandising New Popular Sovereignty (NPS) principles of Humanism and Global Learning.
Variegations of international organisation correlate with Prescriptive Heritagization instantiations of adaptive global cultural forms as the new ‘normativism’ and an ontological anti-myth of human civilisation.
-----
Key to Biostatistics Map of IO HRM:
(1) The Learning Organisation (British Model) Managing Knowledge
(2) The Flexible Organisation (The EU Model) Managing Lateral and Temporal Flexibility
(3) The Transitioning Organisation (Post-Soviet Model) Managing Knowledge Transfer
(4) The Competent Organisation (American Model) Managing Human Resources
(5) The Missionary Organisation (The Dutch Model) Managing Expatriation
(6) The Motivating Organisation (The Japanese Model) Managing Commitment
(7) The Cross-Cultural Organisation (The Multi-Cultural Model) Managing Cultural Differences Across Borders
(8) The Strategic Organisation (The Supranational Organisation) Managing Integration
(9) The Transitioning Organisation (The Chinese Model) Managing Differences Through International Alliances
(10) The Stakeholder Organisation (The Post-Colonial Model) Managing Indigenous Values
cf. ESCP-EAP
Key to Global Cluster Analysis:
Harmony: stresses harmony with nature as opposed to assertion and dominance over the environment
Conservatism: values which support the status quo and likely to be important in societies based on close-knit harmonious relations. Interests of the person are same as the group. Stresses security, conformity and tradition
Hierarchy: stresses power relations and authority and the legitimacy of using power to attain individual or group goals (not the legitimacy of inequalities)
Mastery: mastery of the social environment through self-assertion, and to get ahead of people
Intellectual Autonomy: the individual pursues own interests and desires in the intellectual area (intellectual self-direction)
Affective Autonomy: the individual pursues own interests in the affect domain (stimulation and hedonism)
Egalitarian Commitment: transcending selfish interests, voluntary commitment to promoting the welfare of other people rather than through obligation and kinship ties
cf. Schwartz 1994; Jackson 2002