The problem of predictions in Astrology
Visionary forecasts of the sort "this year you will meet somebody extremely uncommon", "in December you will go home", "for summer you will be pregnant" or "you will have back agony" they don't beat the examination of the least distrustful look. What's more, we can't depend on episodic proof or on the deficient example. Nor in the nature of stargazers. Nor in entering forswearing mode for not having the option to endure the vulnerability of life and the multifaceted nature of crystal gazing ("&%! *"). I feel that on the off chance that we need to be not kidding we need to pay attention to this information and that includes realizing what we have in our grasp (knowing its cutoff points and potential outcomes), comprehending what conditions would need to be met to have the option to state that soothsaying predicts. Also, is that between the absence of thoroughness, (προώθηση ιστοσελίδων)
Advance logical crystal gazing. It will be logical soothsaying that talks genuinely of the connection between the universe and the commonplace.
Condemn solid expectations from a logical point of view.
Support productive discussion.
1. Explanations:
Any control that doesn't contain systems of self-analysis and self-adjustment is bound to deteriorate in authoritative opinion and enthusiasm.
I don't expect to disregard anybody. This is a composing that gives occasion to feel qualms about what is underestimated. Crystal gazing isn't faultless information and concedes analysis. We should not think about it literally, neither do we fall into assaulting individuals (false notion slanderous), yet rather center around the realities, the contentions. The sense of self is the consequence of being so connected to an order (of recognizing such a great amount with knowing). This blocks self-analysis and objectivity. Along these lines, analysis requires having the lowliness and inclination to acknowledge being (fundamentally) wrong.
Nor do I say that soothsaying must be diminished distinctly to science since it is available to numerous methodologies, for example, otherworldly or craftsmanship. There will be maps (celestial models) that approach the comprehension of crystal gazing uniquely in contrast to I do (and welcome is the majority of perspectives). Past the topic of individual flexibility to rehearse crystal gazing that everybody needs, inside this scope of alternatives, I think about helpful analysis (as scholarly practice) real and from logical examination, which makes it conceivable to pass judgment on the estimation of information from a specific point of view.
Unavoidably, there are two significant areas of crystal gazing (which are not watertight) that contention with the targets previously expressed: 1) The mysterious custom (important to have what we have) which puts together its information with respect to the reason that there is that knowing and acing information on the past and that customary is genuine soothsaying since it is concrete and it works . 2) Mass crystal gazing (fundamental for commencement and dispersal) which puts together its information with respect to business achievement, that something satisfies.
Both one and the other space don't utilize a logical standard as a source of perspective to esteem celestial information - which is genuine from the perspective of individual flexibility be that as it may, when there is a case to truth (objectivity), the Scientific methodology offers powerful approaches to test the honesty of a case or hypothesis.
In this composing I am going to concentrate on conventional crystal gazing, be that as it may, as of now there is an enormous wealth of psychoanalytic and postmodernist mental soothsaying, excessively theoretical, riotous and disentangling. While with customary crystal gazing there is an abundance of determinism and solidness, for this situation there would be an excess of uncertainty, which I have broke down commonly.
2. Mass crystal gazing
From Mia Astral (I use it as an image) what I question is the soothsaying of speculations, amazingly disentangling and without redoing anything. I get that on the off chance that you unveil you need to do it (I do it without anyone else's help) however what I propose here is ALSO to take soothsaying to a genuine profession, both logical (I realize that couple of trust this) and counseling (customizing each case) .
Hence, I am not condemning of any divulgence. I condemn that solitary scattering soothsaying is finished. This prompts building up a soothsaying from which what is carefully talking can't be offered will be offered, and this is because of the social weight of the interest that suggests being so anxious to like.
3. Prescient crystal gazing
This is the celestial current that makes the forecasts that this composing presents (to be reasonable it is advantageous to likewise break down the kind of expectations that are produced using mental Astrology).
A long time back I examined prescient crystal gazing. I utilized great visualization methods, anyway my expectations were not satisfied. One might say that it was because of my confinement as a prescient crystal gazer, which I thought was in all likelihood because of the specialized level it suggests. Be that as it may, thus, I talked with renowned expert celestial prophets in such manner, just as dissecting the expectations of crystal gazers alluding to a specialized level. In any case, once more, these expectations were not satisfied above possibility. That I am not a prescient soothsayer doesn't repudiate me for my contentions to be substantial. I may not think about medication (establishments, corpus, methods, and so forth.) however have the ability to evaluate the mending limit (aftereffect) of this order.
Shockingly, the realities are overpowering and this crystal gazing has become, from a logical viewpoint, soothsaying of detachment and separation from the real world. (airport transfers london heathrow)
The way that as of now similar standards and strategies are not followed as conventional crystal gazing is called advancing (some of the time including), similarly as current medication no longer follows Hippocratic dispositions or applies similar procedures (and has tremendously top). Moreover, as I said at the last Iberian congress, celestial prophets have turned crazy the quantity of methods and factors. In our mission to have the option to foresee precisely we have had no real option except to twist the circle dependent on methods and factors, in light of the fact that tolerating the proof of the realities (which we didn't anticipate) was a lot for our self image and feelings.
4. Celestial estimate isn't logical
To confirm that these are forecasts that approve visionary information (with respect to anticipation), numerous controls and a refined system are required. In any case, balanced cases have no legitimacy (it is fundamental in science).
Given this absence of progress, I dove into the comprehension of the prophetic from the ontological and epistemological, there I comprehended numerous things, among them the inconceivability of foreseeing in the manner that I epitomize in this post (despite the fact that I do accept that it permits different sorts of expectations). I thought about numerous parts of this order and reached the resolution that the absence of comprehension of the information that was being dealt with, supported significant disarrays. For instance, the evident straightforward contrast among saying and being. For science, the domain orders and not the guides that are forced by word as real factors. Saying something is genuine doesn't make it genuine. What we have called "anticipation" for quite a long time isn't on the off chance that we subject it to profound and basic reflection. As it were, a conjecture isn't what celestial convention "says" it is, however what it truly is. Or on the other hand to put it another way, the significant thing for me isn't to "state" that something is guess, it is that it should resemble that right now of truth. What's more, what characterizes that "it is so" (that there is visualization) is to profoundly comprehend what we are discussing. At the point when I read celestial prophets state that crystal gazing is a science since it predicts (as though they state they accomplish something logical) there it is affirmed again how little they think about science. Determining, for science, would infer meeting conditions that are not met: When I read crystal gazers state that soothsaying is a science since it predicts (as though they state they accomplish something logical) there it is reconfirmed how little they think about science. Determining, for science, would infer meeting conditions that are not met: When I read celestial prophets state that crystal gazing is a science since it predicts (as though they state they accomplish something logical) there it is reconfirmed how little they think about science. Determining, for science, would suggest meeting conditions that are not met:
Variable control (odd factors).
Control of inclinations (when all is said in done it is to exhibit that the visualization is on account of crystal gazing and not to social studies or other non-prophetic wellsprings of information).
Show enough (abstain from attempting to demonstrate something by singular cases).
Factual noteworthiness.
Replicability (you need to discover approaches to repeat the underlying conditions, so while anticipating one depends on a hypothesis from which forecasts can be inferred deductively).
Falsification (the figure must be concrete and clear, that we can say whether it is right or not).
Others.
Up to that point, the visualization of crystal gazing isn't the anticipation of science. They are two distinct things and it is spoken as though it were the equivalent, which is a genuine error. Furthermore, on the off chance that it is something else, in what sense? Do you realize how to react with at least meticulousness?
5. Astrology and Psychology
At the moment the subject is analyzed for how the solar system was configured at birth it IS astrology. This is determined by the object of study and not by the method or approach.
The moment the subject is involved in being with thoughts, emotions and behavior, psychology is involved (and all the complexity of models, techniques, etc. that this implies).
And it is that the hermetic principle of correspondence involves understanding the isomorphic relationship between heaven (astrology) and earth (psychology). Therefore, for each object of study that astrology has, it corresponds - never better said - a type of terrestrial discipline (world astrology implies politics / economics; medical astrology, medicine, etc.). In this sense, the fact that astrology has become so psychologized (giving rise to Psychological Astrology) is the result of precisely this, of understanding more deeply what is being done and the principles that operate behind it. Therefore, it is inevitable to work to unite both domains (which is a major challenge).
On the other hand, it should be noted that there are personal circumstances and traits that depend on non-astrological variables (physical attractiveness and not whether you have Venus in AC). The same birth chart has people with radically different circumstances, genetics and sociocultural environments. And are they the same? Will the same "be predicted"? The manifestation of the symbolic varies depending on all that (by much analysis of the letters of the parents as a differentiating factor because with the twinsits low weight is evident). And we do see that they can have very 'similar' structures, that all those non-astrological factors are organized by the astrological, but it will be something much more complex and much less deterministic. Therefore, I consider that a lot of research is needed to clarify all this because this new paradigm is very confusing (like any new paradigm).
Finally, a complete union between psychology and astrology would make it necessary to improve the preparation of astrologers in the field of psychology in order to avoid harming or incurring in some practices of dubious ethics.(τζαμια κρυσταλλα)