Segment 12

Evidence Released Of Fake Search Warrant

We just got the green light to release this document. We only subtracted a tiny part which is whited out that has the victim's address on this document. This document came in from our Freedom Of Information Request filed with the county. A copy of this filing is already published on this site. Included in that request was a request for evidence that the documents provided were valid. The county either ignored that part of the request or could not provide it. Why would they ignore that part of the request? Maybe they do not have the evidence? Or is it because what evidence they have shows this document to be a fraud? Or it simply never existed?

Again, because we did in fact request proof and no proof has been given, we have been given the green light the make the following contentions about this document and the people who have signed it.

1.) This document does NOT have a valid time and date stamp on it. Therefore the contention is fair to say that it is illegally back dated.

2.) This document does not have a valid case number assigned to it. 10.45 is not a case number. Circuit Court of Gloucester already confirmed that to us. We contend that 10.45 is actually the date of true creation. May 4th, 2010. 10th year, 4th day, 5th month.

3.) Based on the last posted article, we contend that this document was produced based on the audio that was created earlier that day of May 4th, 2010.

4.) We contend that Steve Baranek and Gloria Owens have colluded and conspired to commit fraud, creating a false document to be used as evidence against the victim of this case.

See what happens when you do not follow proper procedures when it comes to legal documents? These contentions are all fair based on the information above. Any idiot can back date a document. Where is the proof that it was not back dated? Because they say so? I don't think so. To be fair, this document does not have to have a valid time and date stamp on it in order to prove validity. VA Code 19.2-56 Posted below on another article. However, no validity has been provided by Gloucester County when requested. The other area that may have shown some form of validity would have been a valid case number. There is no valid case number here though. Contention stands.