Co-Founder & Director of Qualitative Research
Analytic Research Cooperative, LLC | 2022-Present
Independent Research Consultant
Self-Employed | 2016-2022
Research Associate
AKA Strategy | 2014-2016
Co-Founder & Director of Qualitative Research
Analytic Research Cooperative, LLC | 2022-Present
Independent Research Consultant
Self-Employed | 2016-2022
Research Associate
AKA Strategy | 2014-2016
My applied research focuses on understanding how people experience institutions, programs, and professional pathways, with the goal of informing organizational decision-making and program development. I design and lead qualitative and mixed-methods research projects that combine in-depth interviews, longitudinal qualitative data, and survey data to inform strategy, program development, and field-wide learning.
My work is grounded in qualitative methods and frequently involves collaboration with interdisciplinary teams and integration of multiple data sources across complex research designs.
What I Bring to Research Partnerships
Designing rigorous qualitative and mixed-methods studies
Leading complex, multi-year research projects
Translating research into actionable insights
Working collaboratively with interdisciplinary and cross-functional teams
Seminary to Early Ministry (SEM) Study
Longitudinal Mixed Methods Research
Overview
A multi-year cohort study following divinity school students from matriculation through the early years of their professional careers. The study examines how educational institutions shape career pathways, health, beliefs, and early work experiences.
Methods
Longitudinal in-depth interviews
Annual surveys
Ethnographic site visits
My Role
Lead qualitative research design and data collection across multiple waves
Oversee longitudinal interview protocols
Direct qualitative data analysis and coding strategy
Manage large-scale qualitative data sets (400+ interviews)
Collaborate on mixed-methods integration
Key Contributions
Developed a longitudinal qualitative framework for tracking career trajectories
Identified patterns in professional formation and institutional influence
Lead academic publications and stakeholder-facing reports
Impact
Findings from the study have informed conversations about theological education, clergy wellbeing, and institutional support structures.
Politics and Polarization in Mainline Protestant Congregations
Mixed Methods Research on Religious Authority and Political Speech
Overview
This project examines how clergy navigate political division and polarization within congregational settings, with a particular focus on the role of sermons as a site of political and social authority. To do so, we bring together a large corpus of sermon data collected from United Methodist clergy in North Carolina—over 20,000 sermons collected between March 2020 and February 2021—alongside matched longitudinal survey data, congregational demographic data, and in-depth interviews with clergy.
Methods
Large-scale text dataset (20,000+ sermons)
Longitudinal survey data with clergy (matched to individual sermons)
Congregational demographic data
In-depth qualitative interviews (n=45)
Multi-source data integration across qualitative and quantitative data
My Role
Co-developed the project’s conceptual framework and research design
Co-authored grant proposals securing project funding
Led the qualitative interview component, including instrument design, data collection, and analysis
Contributed to the collection, cleaning, and analysis of large-scale sermon text data
Collaborate on mixed-methods integration and interpretation
Co-author academic papers and stakeholder-facing reports
Key Contributions
Developing an integrated research design linking sermon text, survey data, and interviews
Analyzing how clergy understand and navigate political speech in religious contexts
Identifying patterns in when and how political content appears in sermons
Impact/Research Goals
The project aims to better understand when and how clergy function as political and social authorities, and how institutional, demographic, and individual factors shape political expression in religious settings. It will provide insight into how leaders communicate about contested issues within organizations and how institutional contexts shape that communication. This information will also be used to inform programs, trainings, and support structures for clergy navigating the challenges of rising political polarization.
Reflections in Ministry Study
Longitudinal Qualitative Research on Clergy Careers and Occupational Wellbeing
Overview
This interview-based study examines the career experiences of United Methodist clergy in North Carolina, with a focus on occupational wellbeing, institutional support, and professional development over time. The project is based on two waves of in-depth interviews with 50 clergy. The first wave (June–November 2020) focused on clergy experiences during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, examining how leaders navigated uncertainty, public health restrictions, and rapid organizational change. The second wave follows clergy’s longer-term career trajectories, exploring major challenges, sources of support, and gaps in professional training.
Methods
Longitudinal in-depth interviews (two waves, n=50)
Semi-structured interview design
Qualitative coding and thematic analysis
Comparative analysis across time points
My Role
Led qualitative data analysis across both waves of interviews
Managed and maintained the full qualitative dataset
Designed and directed the development of coding frameworks and analytic strategy
Led the writing of research reports, presentations, and publications
Advise on all ongoing and future projects using this dataset
Key Contributions
Identifying how clergy navigated uncertainty and institutional disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic
Analyzing patterns in career challenges, coping strategies, and sources of support over time
Documenting gaps in training and institutional preparation across career stages
Generating insights into how organizational structures shape occupational wellbeing
Impact/Research Goals
Findings from this study have informed stakeholder-facing reports, presentations, and publications on clergy wellbeing and institutional support. Ongoing work is being used to inform communication and strategy with denominational leaders, with the goal of strengthening support systems and improving clergy occupational wellbeing over time.
In addition to my academic research, I have led and contributed to applied research and evaluation projects in partnership with nonprofit, educational, and professional organizations.
Gap Year Association
Field-Wide Research and Program Evaluation in Experiential Education
Overview
As Chair of the Gap Year Association’s Research Committee, I led and contributed to research initiatives aimed at strengthening data-informed practice across the field of gap year education.
Methods
Field-wide survey design and implementation
Program evaluation advising
Mixed-methods research design
My Role
Led the design and implementation of a field-wide survey of gap year programs
Advised member organizations on program evaluation strategies and data collection
Supported the development of data-informed approaches to program design and improvement
Presented findings and recommendations to association leaders and practitioners
Impact
This work has supported the development of shared data infrastructure and evaluation capacity across the field and informed program development and decision-making among member organizations.
International Education Program Evaluation
End-to-End Mixed-Methods Evaluation of an International, Experiential Learning Program
Overview
Designed and led a mixed-methods program evaluation of an international education program to understand participant experiences and assess program impacts.
Methods
Pre- and post-program surveys
In-depth interviews
Field observations
Integration of qualitative and survey data
My Role
Conceptualized and designed the evaluation study
Secured funding to support the project
Led all aspects of research design, data collection, and analysis
Integrated qualitative and survey findings into a cohesive evaluation framework
Produced reports and recommendations for organizational stakeholders
Impact
Findings informed program modifications, participant experience design, and implementation strategies, supporting ongoing program improvement.
Applied Research & Evaluation Consulting (ARC)
Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation for Nonprofit Organizations
Overview
Design and lead applied research and evaluation projects for nonprofit and mission-driven organizations, with a focus on needs assessment, program design, and iterative program improvement.
Methods
Generative and evaluative user research
Surveys and needs assessments
Interviews and focus groups
Rapid-cycle evaluation design
Mixed-methods analysis
My Role
Design and lead needs assessment and evaluation studies
Conduct qualitative data collection and analysis
Develop survey instruments and evaluation frameworks
Translate findings into actionable recommendations for program development, marketing, and implementation
Impact
These projects have supported organizations in refining program design, strengthening grant proposals, improving participant experiences, and making data-informed decisions about program strategy and growth.
Additional Applied Research
Arts and Culture Funding Field Scans: Conducted large-scale analyses of philanthropic funding data to identify gaps and opportunities across arts and culture sectors, including work with organizations such as the Doris Duke Foundation, Ford Foundation, and NYU’s Brademas Center, informing strategy for foundations and cultural institutions
Religion and Public Health Partnerships (Opioid Epidemic): Led focus groups with clergy and public health leaders to examine cross-sector collaboration, with findings used to inform resources and strategies to strengthen partnerships addressing the opioid crisis