projects

Grassworks: What works and why in grassland restoration in germany? A multi-region social-ecological assessment and pilot implementation of successful approaches.

(funded by the FEdA Initiative on Research in Conservation of Biodiversity/ Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF, 2021-2024, co-I)

Improving grassland restoration requires both detailed ecological studies as well as a deep understanding of the social and governance context in which restoration takes place. Grassworks will address these requirements by focusing on species-rich, multifunctional grasslands within socially diverse cultural landscapes, as well as on the ecological and social contexts they are embedded in. Building on an in-depth social-ecological understanding, including possible trade-offs and synergies, the project will derive concrete scenarios and recommendations for the future.

Just Conservation: linking theories and practices of justice in biodiversity conservation

(funded by the French Foundation for Biodiversity Research (FRB) 2019-2021, member)

This research project will analyse how justice concerns find support and integration in biodiversity conservation; a research need which is currently under-addressed. It asks (a) how different conceptualizations of justice and equity influence the governance of protected areas and other effective conservation measures, and (b) to what extent and through what mechanisms the integration of social objectives in conservation governance influence conservation effectiveness.

Wildlife, Values, Justice: Reconciling Sustainability in African Protected Areas

(funded by the Robert-Bosch foundation 2018-2023, PI)

For hu­mans and wild­life, land is a sc­ar­ce re­sour­ce that gra­dual­ly de­gra­des through in­cre­a­sing de­man­ds for na­tu­ral goods. As a con­se­quence, loss of bio­di­ver­si­ty and eco­lo­gi­cal func­tions threa­tens to af­fect hu­man well-being. The In­ter­na­tio­nal Con­ven­ti­on on Bio­lo­gi­cal Di­ver­si­ty sti­pu­la­tes pro­tec­ted are­as as cor­ners­to­nes to coun­ter­act this trend. Howe­ver, due to ina­de­qua­te go­ver­nan­ce, low ef­fec­tiven­ess in terms of eco­lo­gi­cal and so­ci­al out­co­mes chal­len­ges the sustaina­bi­li­ty of many pro­tec­ted are­as. Thus, so­lu­ti­ons are nee­ded to im­pro­ve con­ser­va­ti­on and in­crea­se hu­man well-being in pro­tec­ted are­as. This pro­ject will in­ves­ti­ga­te the­se glo­bal pro­blems through a ho­lis­tic view on pro­tec­ted are­as as so­ci­al-eco­lo­gi­cal sys­tems in two de­ve­lo­ping coun­tries of the glo­bal South that are im­portant for bio­di­ver­si­ty con­ser­va­ti­on: Zam­bia and Tan­za­nia. Over­all, the pro­ject will ad­van­ce our un­der­stan­ding of pro­tec­ted are­as as are­nas to na­vi­ga­te so­ci­al-eco­lo­gi­cal dy­na­mics towards resi­li­ence and sustaina­bi­li­ty.

A biodiversity hotspot faces intensification of viticulture: The role of Renosterveld remnants for the conservation of butterflies

(DFG funded 2017-2020, PI)

Bio­di­ver­si­ty hot­spots are glo­bal prio­ri­ty are­as for na­tu­re con­ser­va­ti­on, as they con­tain nu­merous en­de­mic spe­cies and have lost much na­tu­ral ha­bi­tat in the past. One ex­amp­le is the Fyn­bos bio­me wi­t­hin the Cape Flo­ris­tic Re­gi­on in South Af­ri­ca, which is un­der pres­su­re due to land-use chan­ge. Here, vi­ti­cul­tu­re in­cre­a­sin­gly ex­pands into rem­nants of Re­nos­t­er­veld ve­ge­ta­ti­on, with un­pre­dic­ta­ble con­se­quen­ces for the as­so­cia­ted fau­na. Whe­ther an in­te­gra­ti­ve con­ser­va­ti­on ap­proach may of­fer so­lu­ti­ons both for bio­di­ver­si­ty and hu­man well-being in the­se land­scapes is yet un­ex­plo­red and would need pro­found un­der­stan­ding of the com­plex so­ci­al-eco­lo­gi­cal in­ter­ac­tions.

Conservation of the Danube Clouded Yellow Colias myrmidone in Romania

(funded through an Advisory Support Programm by the German Environmental Protection Agency (UBA) and the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) 2017-2020, PI)

Ro­ma­nia is one of the last strong­holds of the Da­nu­be Clou­ded Yel­low (Co­li­as myr­mi­do­ne), which is a cri­ti­cal­ly end­an­ge­red Eu­ro­pean but­ter­fly spe­cies. Know­ledge gaps of the eco­lo­gy and the un­der­ly­ing dri­vers for its de­cli­ne hin­der the de­ve­lop­ment and im­ple­men­ta­ti­on of sui­ta­ble ma­nage­ment plans. Through in­ves­ti­ga­ti­ons on the eco­lo­gy of this once wi­de­s­pre­ad spe­cies and si­mul­ta­neous in­ves­ti­ga­ti­ons on land use prac­tices and aspi­ra­ti­ons of lo­cal far­mers, we seek to de­ri­ve ma­nage­ment re­com­men­da­ti­ons for Na­tu­ra 2000 are­as that meet the re­qui­re­ments of the but­ter­fly and the nee­ds of the lo­cal peop­le.

Benefits, Costs and Risks of Diversified Farming Systems (2016-2020, co-supervisor)

Rapid world-wide population growth and associated agricultural intensification leads to social, economic and ecological problems. These problems exacerbate the existing challenges of agricultural management to maintain ecosystem functions and their associated ecosystem services. To mitigate these problems, scientists propose a new model called “Diversified Farming System” (DFS). The DFS model aims to promote critical ecosystem services with a range of agricultural management practices, such as reduced tillage, intercropping, crop rotation, maintenance of hedges or flower strips, across multiple spatial and temporal scales. These management practices may have economic costs as they reduce the amount of land under cultivation or otherwise reduce crop yield. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ecological and economic potential of different DFS management practices and to highlight how they can enhance ecosystem services while being economically viable. To test the economic costs and ecological benefits of DFS management practices we will use a systematic review to rank practices according to ecological benefits and economic costs and we will investigate the risks using a questionnaire designed for German farmers. Additionally, to demonstrate the potential of implementation of DFS management practices we will create a business simulation game.

Right Seeds: Commons-based seeds, varieties and mixtures in agro-ecological crop production (co-supervisor 2017-2020)

Food production in modern agriculture uses only few crop varieties, which are often optimized through breeding. These highly specialized plants are often grown in monocultures in which fertilizers and herbicides are applied to achieve optimal growing conditions. The combination of these techniques cause the reduction of biodiversity within agriculturally used areas, lower resilience of the field crops and limit the amount of genetic material usable for future generations (For further information: MEA 2005). The project investigates whether commons-based seed varieties offer agroecological improvements through the preservation and reintroduction of locally adapted and robust varieties within small-scale farming systems.