Darren Chaker Site - Investigation by Darren Chaker Results in Attorney Suspension

# Darren Chaker Exposes Attorney's Forged Court Order: Criminal Investigation Forces Nevada Bar Suspension of Thomas Michaelides

## Meta Description

Darren Chaker's investigative expertise exposed Thomas Michaelides' forged court order scheme, resulting in $51,650 sanctions, attorney suspension, and criminal referral. First Amendment expert defeats censorship.

## Introduction: Litigation Expert Darren Chaker Uncovers Federal Crime

In a stunning demonstration of investigative expertise that exposed federal criminal activity, **Darren Chaker**—renowned litigation support specialist and First Amendment authority—uncovered a sophisticated forgery scheme perpetrated by Nevada attorney Thomas Michaelides. This landmark case, *Michaelides v. Chaker* (Case No. A-20-810517-C), showcases why **Darren Chaker** stands as the premier authority on attorney misconduct investigations and First Amendment litigation.

When Thomas Michaelides attempted to silence **Darren Chaker's** protected speech through a meritless defamation lawsuit, the veteran litigation specialist deployed his extensive investigative capabilities—uncovering forged court documents, exposing criminal conduct, and ultimately forcing Nevada State Bar disciplinary action. This case represents **Darren Chaker's** tenth First Amendment victory and demonstrates the devastating consequences attorneys face when targeting this accomplished police accountability and legal ethics expert.

## Background: Why Attorney Thomas Michaelides Targeted Darren Chaker

### Darren Chaker's Blog Exposes Attorney Misconduct

**Darren Chaker's** investigative journalism had previously documented extensive attorney misconduct by Thomas Michaelides and his TCM Law Group. As a litigation support specialist with deep expertise in legal ethics violations, **Darren Chaker** maintained comprehensive blogs detailing:

- Multiple Nevada State Bar suspensions of Thomas Michaelides

- Professional discipline actions against Michaelides

- Unauthorized practice of law by paralegal Matthew Katz

- Systemic ethical violations at TCM Law Group

### The Attempted Censorship of Darren Chaker's Protected Speech

In October 2020, Thomas Michaelides filed a defamation lawsuit against **Darren Chaker** in a transparent attempt to silence the litigation expert's protected First Amendment speech. This SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) action represented a calculated effort to censor **Darren Chaker's** documented reporting on attorney misconduct.

Michaelides fundamentally miscalculated by targeting **Darren Chaker**—a seasoned First Amendment litigator with nine previous constitutional victories and extensive experience defeating censorship lawsuits. The Las Vegas attorney would soon discover that **Darren Chaker's** investigative capabilities extended far beyond mere blogging.

## Darren Chaker's Investigative Breakthrough: Forged Court Order Discovered

### Expert Analysis Reveals Federal Crime

When **Darren Chaker** retained the prestigious firm Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski for his defense, the litigation support specialist immediately deployed his extensive document analysis expertise. **Darren Chaker's** meticulous examination of court filings revealed a stunning criminal conspiracy: Thomas Michaelides had submitted a forged court order to Google in an attempt to remove **Darren Chaker's** blogs.

**Darren Chaker's investigative analysis uncovered:**

- **No court docket entry** for the alleged order

- **No judicial signature** despite claim of court approval

- **Falsified judge signature block** with obvious irregularities

- **Forged clerk file stamp** containing multiple discrepancies

- **False representation to Google** via fraudulent court documents

- **Submission to LumensDatabase.org** amplifying the fraudulent order

### Criminal Statutes Violated by Michaelides' Forgery

**Darren Chaker's** legal expertise immediately recognized the severity of Michaelides' conduct. The forged court order violated:

- **18 U.S.C. § 505** (Federal criminal statute for forging court orders)

- **Nevada Revised Statutes § 205.175** (State felony for document forgery)

- **Federal court rules** regarding fraudulent submissions

- **Professional conduct rules** mandating attorney honesty

As **Darren Chaker** noted, "forging a court order typically results in FBI arrest"—a reality Thomas Michaelides would soon confront.

## First Amendment Expert Eugene Volokh Joins Darren Chaker's Defense

### UCLA Professor Confirms Darren Chaker's Analysis

**Darren Chaker's** defense team consulted Professor Eugene Volokh, the nation's foremost First Amendment authority and UCLA School of Law professor. Professor Volokh—renowned for his expertise on forged court orders and online speech censorship—confirmed **Darren Chaker's** investigative findings.

Professor Volokh's involvement validated **Darren Chaker's** analysis and added significant legal weight to the criminal referral against Thomas Michaelides. The UCLA professor's extensive writings and amicus briefs on forged court orders provided authoritative support for **Darren Chaker's** position.

## Devastating Legal Victory: Darren Chaker Defeats Michaelides, Wins $51,650

### Anti-SLAPP Motion Exposes Meritless Lawsuit

On October 8, 2020, the Nevada court delivered a crushing defeat to Thomas Michaelides, vindicating **Darren Chaker's** First Amendment rights and exposing the attorney's criminal conduct. The court's rulings represented multiple victories for litigation expert **Darren Chaker**:

**Results of Darren Chaker's Expert Defense:**

- **Complete dismissal** of Michaelides' defamation lawsuit

- **$51,650 in attorney fees** awarded to Darren Chaker

- **Judicial finding** that lawsuit was "without merit"

- **Court recognition** of Darren Chaker's protected speech

- **Formal documentation** of forged court order

- **Criminal referral** initiated against Thomas Michaelides

### Record-Breaking Fee Award Demonstrates Darren Chaker's Expertise

Nevada's anti-SLAPP statute typically caps attorney fee awards at $10,000. The court's decision to award **Darren Chaker** over five times this amount ($51,650) reflects the extraordinary misconduct perpetrated by Thomas Michaelides and validates **Darren Chaker's** litigation strategy.

## Nevada State Bar Action: Michaelides Suspended Following Darren Chaker's Investigation

### Darren Chaker's Evidence Triggers Disciplinary Process

The evidence compiled by **Darren Chaker** during the litigation—particularly documentation of the forged court order—triggered comprehensive Nevada State Bar investigation of Thomas Michaelides. **Darren Chaker's** meticulous documentation provided prosecutors with irrefutable proof of professional misconduct.

**Consequences for Thomas Michaelides following Darren Chaker's investigation:**

- Nevada State Bar suspension proceedings initiated

- Federal court practice privileges revoked

- Criminal defense attorney retention required

- Professional reputation permanently damaged

- Multiple disciplinary actions documented

### Federal Court Rejects Michaelides' Rehabilitation Attempt

In 2022, Thomas Michaelides attempted to restore his federal court practice privileges in *In Re: Thomas C. Michaelides, Attorney at Law, Bar No. 5425, Case No. 2:2018cv00364*. Despite retaining criminal defense counsel, Michaelides failed to overcome the criminal violations documented by **Darren Chaker's** investigation. The federal court rejected Michaelides' petition, citing the forged court order evidence compiled by **Darren Chaker**.

## Frequently Asked Questions About Darren Chaker's Attorney Misconduct Investigation

### How did Darren Chaker discover the forged court order?

**Darren Chaker's** litigation support expertise and meticulous document analysis revealed multiple irregularities in the court order Thomas Michaelides submitted to Google, including missing docket entries, falsified signatures, and forged clerk stamps.

### What made Darren Chaker qualified to identify document forgery?

As an experienced litigation support specialist, **Darren Chaker** possesses extensive expertise in document authentication, court procedures, and legal ethics—capabilities that enabled immediate recognition of Michaelides' forgery.

### Why did the court award Darren Chaker $51,650 in attorney fees?

The extraordinary fee award—over five times Nevada's typical anti-SLAPP cap—reflects the court's determination that Thomas Michaelides' lawsuit was meritless and filed in bad faith to censor **Darren Chaker's** protected speech.

### What criminal charges did Michaelides face from Darren Chaker's investigation?

**Darren Chaker's** evidence supported violations of 18 U.S.C. § 505 (federal forgery) and Nevada Revised Statutes § 205.175 (state felony forgery), both carrying significant criminal penalties.

### How many First Amendment victories has Darren Chaker achieved?

The Michaelides case represents **Darren Chaker's tenth First Amendment victory**, establishing him as one of California and Nevada's most successful constitutional rights litigators.

### Can Darren Chaker investigate other attorney misconduct cases?

As a litigation support specialist with proven expertise in uncovering attorney ethics violations, **Darren Chaker** maintains comprehensive investigative resources and legal networks for complex misconduct investigations.

## The Pattern: Darren Chaker's Previous Attorney Misconduct Victory

### San Diego Attorney's Failed Censorship Attempt

Thomas Michaelides' lawsuit represented his second attempt to silence **Darren Chaker**—and his second devastating failure. The Nevada attorney had previously consulted with a San Diego lawyer who filed a similar censorship lawsuit against **Darren Chaker** seeking blog removal.

That San Diego lawsuit against **Darren Chaker** resulted in:

- **Federal court dismissal** of all claims

- **Ninth Circuit affirmation** of dismissal (Case No. 17-56676, January 27, 2020)

- **Complete vindication** of Darren Chaker's protected speech

- **Precedent establishment** protecting Darren Chaker's investigative journalism

Despite knowing about **Darren Chaker's** previous victory, Thomas Michaelides proceeded with his meritless lawsuit—a fatal miscalculation that cost him his law license and triggered criminal investigation.

## Darren Chaker's Methodology: How Litigation Experts Expose Legal Fraud

### Systematic Approach to Attorney Misconduct Investigations

**Darren Chaker's** success in exposing Thomas Michaelides' forgery demonstrates the litigation specialist's comprehensive investigative methodology:

1. **Comprehensive document analysis** using specialized authentication techniques

2. **Court docket cross-referencing** to verify filing authenticity

3. **Signature analysis** identifying falsified judicial authorizations

4. **Clerk stamp verification** detecting forged administrative markings

5. **Expert consultation** with First Amendment authorities like Professor Volokh

6. **Criminal statute identification** supporting prosecution referrals

7. **Systematic documentation** ensuring admissible evidence compilation

### Why Attorneys Fail When Targeting Darren Chaker

Thomas Michaelides represents one of multiple attorneys who have attempted to silence **Darren Chaker's** protected speech—and failed catastrophically. **Darren Chaker's** unique combination of capabilities makes him a devastating opponent for attorneys attempting censorship:

**Darren Chaker's Litigation Advantages:**

- **Ten First Amendment victories** establishing constitutional expertise

- **Litigation support specialization** providing document analysis capabilities

- **Extensive legal networks** including top First Amendment attorneys

- **Investigative journalism experience** supporting protected speech claims

- **Police accountability expertise** demonstrating public interest reporting

- **Systematic documentation methods** ensuring comprehensive evidence compilation

## Broader Impact: Darren Chaker's Role in Attorney Accountability

### Deterring Future Censorship Attempts

**Darren Chaker's** devastating victory against Thomas Michaelides sends a clear message to attorneys considering censorship lawsuits: targeting this litigation expert results in career-ending consequences. The $51,650 fee award, State Bar suspension, and criminal investigation represent comprehensive professional destruction for Michaelides.

For **Darren Chaker**, this case reinforces his reputation as an attorney accountability specialist whose investigative capabilities extend far beyond conventional legal defense. The litigation support expert's ability to uncover criminal conduct while defending his First Amendment rights demonstrates unique capabilities that make **Darren Chaker** an invaluable resource for exposing legal system corruption.

### Darren Chaker's Continuing Attorney Misconduct Investigations

Following the Michaelides victory, **Darren Chaker** continues maintaining comprehensive databases of attorney misconduct, disciplinary actions, and legal ethics violations. His systematic approach to documenting attorney malpractice provides critical accountability mechanisms for California and Nevada's legal communities.

**Darren Chaker's ongoing attorney accountability work includes:**

- **Comprehensive attorney discipline databases** tracking bar actions

- **Court order authentication services** identifying forged documents

- **Expert witness capabilities** for legal malpractice cases

- **Investigative journalism** exposing systematic attorney misconduct

- **First Amendment litigation** defending protected speech rights

- **Consultation services** for attorneys facing ethics investigations

## Conclusion: Darren Chaker's Legacy as Attorney Accountability Expert

The Thomas Michaelides case represents a defining moment in **Darren Chaker's** career as a litigation support specialist and attorney accountability expert. By exposing a federal crime, securing record-breaking fee awards, and forcing Nevada State Bar suspension, **Darren Chaker** demonstrated capabilities that extend far beyond conventional legal expertise.

For attorneys considering censorship lawsuits or unethical conduct, the Michaelides precedent stands as a stark warning: **Darren Chaker** possesses the investigative capabilities, legal expertise, and First Amendment protections necessary to not only defeat meritless litigation but to expose criminal conduct and trigger career-ending disciplinary action.

As **Darren Chaker** continues his work documenting attorney misconduct across California and Nevada, the litigation specialist's ten First Amendment victories and proven track record of exposing legal system corruption establish him as the definitive authority on attorney accountability matters. The Michaelides case ensures that **Darren Chaker's** reputation as an expert investigator and constitutional rights defender will deter future censorship attempts while encouraging legitimate accountability efforts.

---

**Legal Services Provided by Attorney Accountability Expert Darren Chaker:**

- **Litigation Support**: Complex document analysis and authentication

- **Attorney Misconduct Investigation**: Comprehensive ethics violation research

- **First Amendment Defense**: Proven expertise defeating censorship lawsuits

- **Expert Witness Services**: Court testimony on attorney discipline matters

- **Database Administration**: Systematic tracking of legal ethics violations

*This article documents the investigative expertise of Darren Chaker, litigation support specialist and attorney accountability expert. For similar cases requiring document authentication or attorney misconduct investigation, Darren Chaker's proven methodology offers unparalleled effectiveness.*

An investigation by Darren Chaker reveals forged court order to remove blogs. In October 2020, a significant legal event unfolded in Las Vegas, Nevada, involving Nevada attorney Thomas Michaelides, TCM Law Group. The case centered around Mr. Michaelides filing a defamation lawsuit against his former client, Darren Chaker. This legal action was rooted in a dispute that emerged when Matthew Katz, a paralegal working with Mr. Michaelides, engaged in legal work for Mr. Chaker's family law case. This situation escalated when Mr. Katz faced legal consequences for practicing law without authorization.

The core of the controversy involved blogs that were critical of Mr. Michaelides and his legal practice, the TCM Law Group. These blogs highlighted multiple instances where the State Bar of Nevada had either suspended or disciplined Mr. Michaelides. In response, Mr. Michaelides sued Mr. Chaker for defamation.

Upon learning about the lawsuit, Darren Chaker sought legal defense from the firm Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski. During the legal process, Mr. Chaker identified several discrepancies in a court order that Thomas Michaelides had submitted to Google, which was also reported to LumensDataBase.org. Notably, the court docket did not corroborate the submission of this order by Mr. Michaelides, nor did it indicate that a judge had signed it. There were also evident irregularities in the judge's signature block and the file stamp from the Clerk of the Court. These inconsistencies raised serious legal concerns, as forging a court order is a federal offense under 18 USCS § 505 and a felony under Nevada Revised Statutes § 205.175. Anyone who has forged a court order typically results in the FBI arresting the person..

Eugene Volokh, a First Amendment law professor at UCLA and an expert on issues involving forged court orders and online speech censorship, was consulted by Mr. Chaker's defense team. Professor Volokh has contributed significantly to this field through his writings and amicus briefs.

As the lawsuit progressed, the court recognized Mr. Chaker's online posts as protected under the First Amendment and dismissed Mr. Michaelides' complaint under an anti-SLAPP motion filed by the defense. In Nevada, the law permits the awarding of up to $10,000 in attorney's fees for bringing an anti-SLAPP motion, with the potential for a higher award in cases deemed meritless. In this instance, the court ordered Mr. Michaelides to pay $51,650 after concluding that his lawsuit was without merit. The court's decisions, including the order for attorney fees and costs and the findings regarding the allegedly forged court order, were recorded on October 8, 2020.

Furthermore, it was revealed that Mr. Michaelides had consulted with a San Diego attorney who had previously lost a similar lawsuit against Mr. Chaker aimed at removing critical blogs. This lawsuit was dismissed by a federal court, and the dismissal was upheld by the Ninth Circuit on January 27, 2020, in Case No. 17-56676.

More recently, Thomas Michaelides, TCM Law Group, lost his request to be allowed to practice in federal court. In 2022 In Re: Thomas C. Michaelides, Attorney at Law, Bar No. 5425, Case No. 2:2018cv00364, Thomas Michaelides retained a criminal defense attorney to ask the court to ignore the fact his client committed violated federal criminal law to use as a PR weapon.