by Annette Walker
The media ownership and consolidation controversy, thrust into the
spotlight in 2003, has generated an historic national dialogue as well as a
growing Media Reform Movement. Never before have broad sectors of the
public had face-to-face contact with the august Federal Communications
Commission. Never before has the public felt a sense of urgency to express
its perceptions of media and its opposition to the corporate mergers and
takeovers that have changed the media landscape.
Capitol Hill observers have noted that since 2003 the ownership and
consolidation issues have moved from relative obscurity to prominence in
Congress. Several thousand individuals, mostly representing a plethora of
public interest, civic and community groups have testified at seven FCC
hearings about ownership regulations. Thousands more have testified
at Town hall Meetings sponsored by the Free Press, the largest of new
organizations that focus upon media issues. The two Democratic FCC
Commissioners usually participate in these Free Press meetings.
The root of this surge in popular participation is the section in the
1996 Telecommunications Act mandating that the FCC periodically
review its broadcast ownership rules to determine “whether any of such
rules are necessary in the public interest as a result of competition.” In
late 2002 the FCC, under the leadership of Michael Powell, initiated
a review and, following established procedures, invited the
public to forward comments to the FCC. Surprisingly,
within a few months over 16,000 messages had been
received. Most of the responses opposed media mergers.
Nonetheless, in June 2003, in a vote of 3-2 (there
are 5 commissioners), the FCC approved six mediaownership
rule changes that removed some of the
traditional limitations on ownership and gave media
companies more latitude.
Powell and the other Republican Commissioners
voted for the rules changes even though they knew about
the devastating results of the deregulation of radio provided
for in the Telecommunications Act. The classic example is
that in 1996 Clear Channel owned 36 stations and today owns
over 1200. There are several studies that demonstrate the local news and
programming has been deemphasized at Clear Channel and tends to be a
casualty after a corporate takeover.
Some Groups mounted a judicial challenge (Prometheus vs.
FCC) against the FCC decision. In June 2004 the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals, contending that some of the rules were “arbitrary and
capricious”, stayed their implementation. The U.S. Senate also passed
an resolution of disapproval. The Supreme Court refused to review the
decision. Therefore, the FCC now has to reconsider changes in
ownership rulemaking.
Late in his tenure, Chairman Michael Powell convened hearings in
Richmond, Charlotte and San Antonio. Since the Fall of 2006, Kevin
Martin, the new chairman, has convened hearings in Los Angeles,
Nashville, Harrisburg (PA), and, most recently, Tampa. He has promised
two more hearings this year.
Concern about the increase in media behemoths, the concomitant
decrease in small media ownership, and the adverse effect upon news and
public affairs and diversity programming have resulted in the inclusion
of media issues on the agendas of many organizations, such as Rainbow/
Push, Common Cause, the Consumers Union, the United Church
of Christ’s Office of Communication, FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy
in Reporting), the National Organization of Women, the American
Psychological Association, the Media Access Project, the Project of
Excellence in Journalism as well as labor unions, trade associations, think
tanks and academicians.
The emergence of Free Press, dedicated to activism as well as analysis
and critique was serendipitous. Co-founded in late 2002 by journalist
John Nichols, activist Josh Silver and media historian Robert McChesney,
Free Press is headquartered in Massachusetts. Its presence, however,
is ubiquitous.
For the past four years Free Press has organized Town Meeting, which
are essentially alternatives to FCC hearings on media ownership and
consolidation. FCC Commissioners are always invited to participate and
the two Democrats, Michael Copps and Jonathan Edelstein, always do. At
the recent Columbus Town Meeting Robert McDowell became the first
Republican Commissioner to participate.
Free Press meetings have taken place in Albuquerque, Portland,
Dearborn (MI), St. Paul, Iowa City, Norfolk, Asheville (NC), Los Angeles,
Milwaukee, Austin, New York City, Oakland, Hyde park (NY), Seattle,
Philadelphia and Columbus (OH).
Free Press always partners with local groups. Among the co-sponsors
at the meeting in Oakland was the local NAACP; in New York City,
several Hispanic media organizations; in Columbus, the Metropolitan
Church Council and the United Church of Christ.
Free Press also has instituted biannual Media Reform Conferences.
The first took place in Madison, WI in November 2003.
Approximately 1600 journalists, activists and scholars attended.
The goals were to strengthen grassroots and national coalitions,
develop unified plans for immediate and long-term reforms,
and generate policies and strategies that will structurally
improve the media system.
Among the speakers was Civil Rights activist and
U.S. Congressman John Conyers (D-Michigan). Other
speakers included Bill Moyers, Ralph Nader and Democratic
FCC Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein.
Here was some criticism of the conference: high
registration fees, an emphasis on big names and insufficient
attendance by people-of-color. Some critics of the conference even
organized a parallel event. Some panelists participated in both conferences.
It is ironic that Free Press organizes alternatives to FCC hearings only
to have grassroots and community groups organize parallel events to its
conference. However, this clearly demonstrates the importance that people
give to the media.
The second Media Reform conference took place in 2005 in St. Louis
with approximately 2500 in attendance. The third occurred in January of
this year in Memphis with 3500 in attendance. Among the many speakers
were the Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr., actor and activist Danny Glover, Janine
Jackson of FAIR, deejay Davey D. and the Rev. Lennox Yearwood of the
Hip Hop Caucus.
Lisa Vives, director of Global News Network, which distributes
news and features on Africa and the developing world to mainstream and
alternative media, headed a delegation of African-American, Caribbean
and African journalists.
In September 2006 Free Press released its study entitled “Out of
the Picture: Minority and Female TV Station Ownership in the United
States.” It demonstrates how the elimination of traditional limits on media
ownership will have an adverse effect upon the already minimal levels of
minority and female ownership.
The nation awaits the FCC’s next move. Chairman Martin promises
two more hearings before the end of the year. However, what most
observes expect is a new strategy to allow far more mergers and
corporate takeovers.
Annette Walker regularly writes about the FCC.