Complications un-needed
These changes are slowly working their way into texts at all levels, but not uniformly and over periods of decades rather than years.
Un-necessary complication, and even cognitive-dissonance, on the information-superhighway may be spread inadvertently by folks who were taught thermodynamics using only 18th century language. Instances of this might include: "Entropy last" introductions to thermal systems are pretty much gone from the senior undergraduate and graduate physics curriculum, but they remain in place (except in Tom Moore's and Eric Mazur's texts) for many intro-physics courses (which unfortunately is where we come into contact with the largest number of students).
Discussions of entropy, uncertainty, and even information-content as localized state-functions rather than as measures of the subsystem-correlation or its lack: (i) with respect to an implicit reference state, and/or (ii) with the world external to an isolated system.
Papers that claim negative reciprocal-temperatures to be meaningless (a response to one of which inspired the interesting Carnot cycle diagram at right), with no apparent awareness of their very natural roots (as Lagrange-multiplier uncertainty-slopes) in statistical inference.
What else?
