John J. Connolly
Publications Website
I am a Maryland lawyer and an occasional writer on legal and other issues. This site collects articles and commentary I have published and self-published in my personal capacity over the years. Views expressed in these articles are solely my own and do not constitute legal advice.
Last update: March 2, 2024
Submit comments to connoljohn@gmail.com.
Running After the Mosquito Truck
March 2, 2024 -- A reflection on the administrative state during the reign of Chevron.
Why Maryland Did Not Ratify the Fourteenth Amendment (Until 1959)
February 6, 2024--My Black History Month contribution on Maryland's extremely slow journey to ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment
Did Anyone in the Late 1860s Believe the President was not an Officer of the United States?
December 6, 2023--A Colorado trial court held that President Trump was not disqualified under section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment because he had not previously taken an oath as "an officer of the United States." That holding is criticized on several grounds, including that even in 1868 everyone believed the president was an officer. Well, maybe not everyone.
The Conscious Uncoupling of the Maryland and
Federal Constitutions
September 18, 2023--Maryland courts have a long history of interpreting state constitutional rights "in pari materia" with comparable rights in the federal constitution. Is that changing?
Can the North Carolina Courts Moot a Pending U.S. Supreme Court Case?
March 22, 2023--In the Moore v. Harper independent state legislature case, the North Carolina Supreme Court granted rehearing after the U.S. Supreme Court had issue a writ of certiorari and heard argument, but before it ruled. Can the NC Court do that?
The Eleventh Circuit Interprets Bruen
March 15, 2023--In a recent decision the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit resolved several methodological questions left open by Bruen. In general the Court endorsed the view that the Reconstruction and post-Reconstruction era were more relevant to the requisite historical analysis than the Founding era. That methodology provides more flexibility for modern legislators, but will it hold up?
Analogical Reasoning After Bruen
A recent federal appellate decision takes a narrow view of "relevantly similar" firearms laws. (Note March 15, 2023: the Fifth Circuit issued a revised decision after this piece was posted.)
Abstract per SSRN: Historical state laws regulating firearms have become relevant to modern firearms legislation after the Supreme Court’s decisions in Heller, McDonald, and Bruen. This article tries to catalog and analyze all historical firearms laws in one of the original 13 states, Maryland, and considers how those laws might affect modern legislative efforts to regulate firearms.
The 19th Century Toy Pistol Crisis and How it Relates to Modern Ghost Guns
December 23, 2022
In the 1880s, injuries from "toy" guns were causing painful deaths to numerous children. The General Assembly quickly banned them. Does that law have any relevance today?
In Appreciation: Lawrence F. Rodowsky
October 14, 2022
A remembrance of one of the leading lights of Maryland law for 60 years. First published on October 14, 2022, in the Bar Library Advance Sheet.
Sorry About the Last 185 Years
The Baltimore Sun Apologizes
February 22, 2022
My take on the Baltimore Sun's apology for nearly two centuries of racial news coverage.
The Public Disciplinary Complaint
What happens when attorney disciplinary complaints are made public before the investigation ends or, in some cases, even begins?
Pointless Rant on the Changing Name of our High Court
Wherein I rise in support of "Court of Appeals of Maryland" -- the name, not the institution. (To be clear, this piece is classified as humor.)
Black History Month Contribution
February 15, 2021
This article considers legislation a border state enacted during the slavery era for the purpose of subjugating its Black residents, whether free or slave. The article postulates that these anachronistic laws reveal modern truths about racial discrimination; in particular, the ruling class’s capacity for rationalizing the immorality of slavery and racial oppression by promulgating laws and official state practices that were by turns cruel, petty, petulant, patronizing, incoherent, and absurd. The state’s laws at the time reflect the white populace’s broad belief that Great Britain created Maryland’s racial problem by forcibly transporting indigenous Africans to a land where they could not compete with whites, and that the problem would be solved only when the descendants of those slaves returned to Africa. All this is presented from the perspective of a modern white male Maryland lawyer who has never experienced racism. The article closes with a reflection on the author’s family history.
In Defense of Judicial Elections (Mar. 2020)
The bench, the bar, and the academy don't much like judicial elections, while legislators and the public are not so sure. Would the framers of the Maryland constitutions have anything to add to the debate?
The Maryland Constitution and Federal Impeachment (Feb. 2020)
Does the Maryland Constitution have anything to say about whether the federal Impeachment Clause requires "criminal-like" conduct? Not much, I think, but read the article and let me know.
Is Maryland's Oath of Office Intentionally Subversive of Federal Authority? (published January 21, 2020, in Baltimore Bar Library newsletter).
All Maryland state officials must take an oath that was written in 1867, two years after the Civil War ended. Do officials know what obligations they are undertaking? Do I? Read the article and let me know.
ELECTRONIC BOOKS
PRIOR ARTICLES
Links to other articles
Should Executives Arbitrate? The empiricists weigh in. Suits-by-suits blog March 10, 2015).
The shameful treatment of foreign children in U.S. custody. Baltimore Sun December 2012.
Don't suspend habeas corpus. Baltimore Sun November 2005.