Last Update: 12.06.2025
Hello Chess Friends

1st of all, let Me allow please here some more notes about over:I've just found other Deeds bad actions again..and against who? Unfortunately, he tries to damage my chess activities/name, butWithout success...due TRUE may shakes but does not collapse!
Meanwhile,I thought that Prodeo forum is a serious, moderated place, but not so!Anyhow, not BIG problem...there are many other better chess forums!
And here we go...with much more details,  happy reading )
Dann Corbit wrote:..Another important source of data for me is the Book tests of SedatChess.. collection and analyzed deeply...
Thank you Mr. Dann Corbit, for your interest and kind words over long past years!And no doubt your contributions over our Computer chess are highly appreciated.,
deeds wrote:I'm not a book creator so I'm not looking for perfect lines.
No any surprise, since Deeds is proved already that he is looking for very bad,Blundered weak lines which belonging to old-dated years! Anyhow, my advice:The time is ripe about Deeds to start paying a bit attention over strong lines...Otherwise, if newer Duels.. again Top books (via Bullet) will smash.. then notRapid, even Slow time controls will not help regarding Depth4 to be survived!
-Regarding the SedatChess circus, 
Circus? Come on )) if so..then why over years, Deeds is so much interested?! 
But however there is one true:- Deeds is daily SedatChess's visitor... Anyhow, thanks to him as well..Why? Due these kind of brains are forcing Me to work harder/smarter!
SedatChess = Zero Trust
If zero trust..then why Deeds is much engaged over my chess activities?)And NOT since yesterday, he is frequent SedatChess's visitor since 2021!And once more we noticed that Papers and Reality are 2 different things!What I can add more, if not clear: Deeds actions speak louder than words!
One thing more,I hardly doubt.. but let's say that I'm wrong, now what will happen?) if that boyDoes not trust anymore..I'll lose EURO? no..since it's my hobby..not business!Plus, all the same and it is not a great loss if people like Deeds will trust or not,But undoubtedly SCCT is a special one, not for everyone and different than all!
-it's just another blunder's factory (1 thread @ ultra bullet) so their tourneys results are meaningless.
Really this guy never learns  that 'apples' and 'oranges' are 2 different things!In fact, Deeds is engaged on learning but as usual he sucks again and againAnd just to be more clear, for best performance (fore more than two decades): I run / use Core/s (not Thread/s) for my Benchmarks, Tours, Ratings! in sameTime that means my 2x Epyc 7B12's Hyper-Threading is disabled from Bios...Thread/s term is used generally when Hyper-Threading is enabled but it seems3-4 years (since he is in..) not enough time about Deeds to learn about all over,Maybe after 30-40 years, Deeds will learn/use the word 'Core/s' over...?!) PlusSCCT's Bullet 1 Core can be counted MP, Blitz on Deeds hardware, just saying..In fact, my produced data is more useful for majority / overall chess community!This is also true, SedatChess site is NOT main center.. but based on web stats, The interest over my chess activities is unbelievable...millions of views for sure!And as being a human, it makes Me feel happy that my efforts are not in vain..
Moreover,I disagree with Deeds again, since SCCT's used time controls are various! e.gI've managed to organize a lot of tours even in latest years as Blitz, MP etc. butOften I use Bullet TC, 1 Core mainly for 3700+ tours, due to reduce the draws..Btw, here is my other favorite saying about all over, which I think perfectly suits: 
“To see a win (if playing under optimal cond.) by Top engines:It's like looking for a needle in a haystack, and what's point ofUsing BIG umbrella, if almost no any drop rain on the horizon.”
But this is also true that,Before NNUE era, my tours were mainly MP, Ponder ON via Blitz, Rapid, Slow..But as I stated earlier many times, due high draws, I use mainly Bullet, 1 Core...And is this all? Not of course, nowadays mostly serious platforms with engines3700+ Elo are played mainly via Bullet, 1 Core... and my respect...plus, I see Nothing wrong, besides NNUE 3700+ Bullet 1 Core can be counted in strengthIn quality as in Rapid, Slow TC in Past: Results ,sure if using strong openings!
On other hand, in case of running tours via bad, so weak openings,Forget about producing high-quality games! Even 40/120 slow time Control will not help over, because corruption starts at the opening! 
In the meantime, here are my other sayings about all over:
“There is no greater fault than preferring the weak openings,Where the strong openings play as golden key to gain points”
“It's pointless, if using just weak openings for Whites or Blacks,Since chess is a game for two sides, besides the weak lines areNot useful for majority, at least for the serious chess players.”
“Via weak lines for determining eng strength is needed thousandsOf games (per player,) otherwise the error margin can be too high,But via strong openings, minus plus one thousand games enough.”
-I just spent years proving that Sedat is a clown and used tourney's conditions which were unfair:
Well, he may say 3-4 years period of time, but did not play any role over proving!Furthermore, what kind of prove? In SCCT: suggestions, ideas are welcomed, butI'd be happy (if failure, critics) to be in respectively...but not in barbaric, brutal way...And here are my other rules, this should be known as well...once more, my workMay be free, without donations etc. but remember that NOT so cheap as it looks!I still remember his 1st attacks over Me, e.g as What a HUGE lie etc. on OutskirtYes, he is so hopeless guy and he is a LOSER, not only in game but in EURO too!Actually sometimes he is WINNER too, but via fake accounts plus on his own PC!
Pardon, now I remembered about my unfair matches, see for more: Details/ResultsYes in those days I've ran some unfair Duels: Depth4 played via Blitz 2m+1s vs TopBooks 30s+0.5s and despite with unfair cond. Top  books won..this is NOT as joke!Actually all about what I mentioned, tested etc.. ere as real facts, not jokes for sure!
And is this all? not of course, I ran other 'unfair' Duels, again Depth4 is lost..butSuch as by 20+ later by 50+ Elo stronger..just only by 80+ Elo stronger engine, His used lines are performed better, but not so much superior: Results / GamesJust imagine the terrible source data (by Deeds), his lines have much BIG holes!On other hand, I offered him many useful ideas, advice over but he refused..Yes,You can not make a crab walk straight...and every sheep is hung by its own leg!
- losses on time forfeit
Not true... SCCT's overall tours are so stable! containing no time loses, Exc. in myRecent Duel, Hypnos 1.02 (by M.Z) lost on time Results Moreover, if time loses etc.It's ridiculous when he is blaming Me)) Btw, other but newer advise to Deeds is that,He have to contact Gui/Eng programmers..they may help over..but not Me for sure!Yes I'm good in my job, but not all in my hands, anyhow, once more, all recent tours,Actually over long years, SCCT data is one of most stable, based on millions games!
- books created from training games which also contain GUI's moves (unplayed moves by the engines)
Oh...I'm tired to read by Deeds such as, he is in trainings, trainings, trainings..In other words:When we'll see his tourney games to be organized by Deeds, soon or never?
And interesting, rather I'd say as strange news is that,Deeds could try to name his Player games as 'GUI Moves'!But he preferred to be named as Depth4 EXP player...why?So in current case...I can not see any mistake by my side!
- unmatched EXP files for learning engine
Hehe..in Deeds testings, all are matched? I hardly doubt..andAs far as I know, he is just a GREAT cherry picker on his PC !!Yes, Deeds stays far away from the strong players! and why?He is STILL in trainings? LOL and how many more years areRequired that his Depth4 to be ready for 'tournament' mode ?)Yes..reality is reality, Deeds picks the old-dated rubbish lines andHe is trying to show, to fool all...such as his EXP is so strong but What about his EXP to be tested in independent known sources? Let's say vs TREND strong players? No such thing on horizon !!And if I'm missing something here.. please contact / correct Me..
 - renamed EXP files and reauthored BIN files
Nonsense...actually once I re-named...but I did notHide at all, I clearly stated, based on Eman: DetailsMaybe next time, I've to ask for a permission... ??Yes..Deeds bullshit series are ON.. unfortunately!
Well, actually I've explained years ago...but as last:E.g if you are going to ask why I've re-named fromEman to StockfishMZ exp due to be played in auto..Otherwise, it's complicated...to edit Eng settings etc.Moreover, I see nothing wrong...and 100% deserves..Since via learned games vs ProteusSF plus vs more..About Eman exp is became close in playing style as StockfishMZ..And to be more clear, why not Eman,But StockfishMZ is participated (as main engine) ?Due in those times, Eman series were not so stable,E.g often crashed...sure I refer if via parallel matches.. Yes, you've to be in my shoes to see the whole picture. And frankly, there is no any other explanation of that!  
And what a record, right?) just once I re-named..sinceSCCT includes tens of thousands engines, books, exp..But he still (almost 3 years) blames Me for that...andEven those people who clone, steal..are less blamed!
One thing more, since we talk about re-naming etc.Here I can not say as same words for Deeds, sinceHe is a BIG master on fake accounts (on forums) !!And I'm not going to count, due to I may miss...but  Several fake accounts for sure!) and proved over!
Btw, as other very strange, funny behaviours by Deeds,This kind of brain forgets or so passive and invisible e.gWhen exactly the same StockfishMZ player was WinnerBefore...then no any insults, slanders by Deeds... why?Yes..he was in MUCH silence in that time, I wonder too,What kind of 'double standard' can be of that ? I meanIn 2022: the same player Winner: Results, but OOPS !)But after, just when LOOSER, tons of insults were born!
Is this all? not of course, so what? if Eman exp was NOTRe-named...Duel results would be changed? I hardly doubt..BLA-BLA BLA and for years..furthermore, even both same Exp files (Eman + StockfishMZ) are played in several otherTours...again they could not be Winners etc..that's all over!
- published results of fake learning engines
Not sure, but likely he refers about Eman 10 (by SOLIDOR),But I'm not reason here, if Eman eng shows as 10 version!
- tourneys with EXP files set on training mode instead of tourney mode
Again I'm not reason here, since as usual, I used to play via defaults!Moreover, just in case of any failure. I may re-play..but so far, NON ofReal authors are complained, even many of them were grateful...So itSeems stable, at least in almost all tours.. Btw, who is this guy: Deeds?He is 'last' person who has right to talk due his famous EXP was neverPlayed in independent, trusted / known sources..Exc. on Deeds PC !)
- EXP files overwritten with concurrency > 1
But RapTora, Spectral plus many more..proved: Results / Results2I organized many more tours (Learning ON), but no free time for all..But at least I say even via 64/68/72 concurrency,..they gained a lot!And most important, these great records were via strong openings!Not like in Deeds non-serious testings because his produced data is Based on weak lines.. it doesn't reflect/suit much to strong players!If nothing else, all my Duels, Tours (via Depth4 player) indicate this..
Anyhow, here is my another advice to Deeds:This is just a chess game, if you did not 'win' today, Tomorrow is another chance to live your dreams!
- unstable hardware forcing limited filesize of EXP files
I disagree again...since my main tournament machine (2x EPYC)Is almost daily bencmarked..to check its speed, stability etc. andFrankly I see fast CPUs performance, proved, guaranteed ResultsMoreover, on my machine: No internet connection.. against anyKind of threats.. e.g just Windows operating files and only chess Programs, engines, exp, book files installed.,..no more, no less!
But I admit also that, e.g depending on EXP file sizes,Engines via HUGE exp were NOT stable, they crashed..Sure I refer if Gauntlet and 64 parallel matches..but in case,Deeds have to contact those Eng/Exp developers, not Me!Due my machine has 128 Physical Cores, 256 GB Ram..!But this is also true, if round-robin tour all worked flawlessly..Sure I mean also that in case of testing many players in...
And what I said before: Details only my machine is left to be Not criticized.. but finely he is started to blame such as notStable.. hehe )) and I'm NOT going in 'pissing' contest with Deeds hardware..but believe Me, there will be a lot of speed,Stability difference..in case, don't ask in favor for which one )
Btw, this is other question but it's interesting to point out that,Why Deeds never prefers NPS values (in his shared games)? A mystery...since there are GUIs, which record as 40 ThreadsIn other words, Trust but verify! but not possible in Deeds tests..And as nature rules, I'd prefer to trust on facts than papers!
On the other hand,Deeds may hate who work for free, such as it's slavery: DetailsIf so..why he never prefers the paid: programs, books, engines?Really strange? Actually what's normal in Deeds cheap actions?
Btw, a new saying is born, what about this, sounds good?A low-quality work deserves free, otherwise it's a greedy!And just don't ask Me please about which product one !)
For anyone missed too, sure no free time for all, since heTried to harass my name so so much times but if nothing Else here are some of 1st attacks on OpenChess: DetailsLater he insulted as I'm a Liar Details Dictator: Details 2 But 1st ever Deeds attacks are born in 2022 on Outskirts,Where he was/is with several various accounts such as:chris, botunnet, deeds, unofficial and still protected,As VIP member by non-serious forum Admins, Mods!
In other words, after so many attacks over my address,I think that I've FULL right to defense..plus to prove that Reality and Papers are two completely different things!
And this note is going to people who has 'two' faces:Your masks fallen, now is clear, but still is NOT late:Be a bit honest, don't be in the side of the dark, bad!And shame on all ...who STILL support, feed him (
Moreover, all we know perfectly that,Deeds actions are so childish. such as he loves toSlander...to insult..but in the end: the 'good' wins !!At least, all of played matches are proved to be so!
One thing more, Often I've asked myself...and already I believe in thatDeeds is a troll.. that's why he has a personality with No pride..therefore, he does not care so much aboutWhat we will say etc.and 100% clear that his target is Child's play: to eliminate all good but via cheap papers!Yes, everything is cheap by Deeds, exc. his EXP is notCut-price, he ask about 80 € (per item) a good business!
And just a few notes to forum authorities, where is Deeds,No any honest, serious Moderator will tolerate his insults!And without banning, they're not less 'hopeless' than him!Hope helps...
After all, what I can say more over and over:I'm just a human and if I have made any mistakes towards..SORRY! But it's all about my love over Computer Chess!And all of us make mistakes, no one is perfect, right? ButI admit, the weak people never apologize.. sad, but true!!Yes, they blamed Me also as I've BIG ego but rather I'd say:Theirs EGO is MUCH bigger...since they never say SORRY!And they never Congratulate..and why? Is it so hard about?Plus their EGO is so BIG, coming as best experts..such asThey know everything..nice..but before, real facts required!Actually here, there are much useful lessons..and if they willGain..will be good if not..too bad..but I can live with that too!
Btw, here just a brilliant quote:Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events;Small minds discuss people! 
Other great quote (in case of behind someone's back, even for years): He who does not make many dogs bark after him is not a wolf.
And without not mentioning this, I can't as well: I figured out about Deeds (via attacking, slandering Me over years):His target is simply to be popular..as bad publicity is good publicity !
Do you know / remember too?These brains are as copies...almost same as in past..what did they...?)Exception the similarity that they attacked via fake accounts on forums, The guy (Harry) said CIRCUS in 2007 other said: his book in training inPCC 2008 / PCC 2009 / GAMES, other one said: No Trust to Sedat etcIn short, theirs actions are so much similar to each other, but too boring!
And to be honest, I don't hate the jealous people, they are jealous,Because they think that I'm better than them !)
However, for my own good,Instead of talking more about such hopeless losers, I think thatIt would be much better to talk on winners, great chess friends!
As final words,You may notice or not my main target, goal is that,To help to Computer chess forum Admins, Mods..Plus in case of similar situations.. to gain as well,You know, the more we share, the more we have!Let's hope also that my research, work to be usefulAt least to Authorities of serious online platforms!
That's all for now and thanks for reading )

Best,Sedat