Mobility
ResCampus Project
Spreading active transportation: peer effects and key players in the workplace, with M. Lambotte, S. Mathy and A. Risch
We investigate the role of peer effects at the work place on the individual choice of transportation mode. We collect original data through an online survey on networks and sustainable behaviors among 334 individuals working in ten laboratories of the University of Grenoble Alps in February 2020. Using a linear-in-means model for binary outcomes and distinguishing endogenous and exogenous peer effects, correlated effects and network endogeneity, we find that peers have a significant and positive effect on individual active transportation mode’s choice. We show that in our setting, a simulated policy or intervention would be almost twice more effective in spreading active transportation mode through social spillover effects if it targets key players rather than random individuals.
Intermob Project
InterMob: a 24‑month randomised controlled trial comparing the efectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness‑raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France, BMC Public Health, 22: 1763, 2022, with Teran-Escobar C., Duché S., Bouscasse H., Isoard-Gatheur S., Juen P., Lacoste L., Lyon-Caen S., Mathy S., Ployon E., Risch A., Sarrazin P., Slama R., Tabaka K., Chardonnel S. and Chalabaev A.
Is the impact of transport modes on health an individual determinant of transport mode choices? with R. Rejeb, H. Bouscasse and S. Mathy
In this article, we evaluate the extent to which information on the impact of mode choice on public or individual health influences our mobility. In other words, does knowing that taking the car increases the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases for the user, through lack of physical activity, and for her co-citizens, through air pollution, has an influence on the choice of alternative modes to the car? We address this question collecting original data in the Grenoble metropolitan area (France) and implementing a Discrete Choice Experiment. Respondents were presented different scenarios varying depending on mode (car, public transport and cycling), travel time, travel cost and associated cardiovascular risk. We find that information on health risks related both to air pollution and to lack of physical activity influence participants modal choice's intentions. Willingness-to-pay to reduce the individual risk is equal to 0.85€ per trip made by public transport for a risk reduction of 2 percentage points while the corresponding WTP to reduce population risk range between 0.80€ and 1.29€ depending on the share of the population also adopting alternative modes to the car. Similar WTP are found for the bicycle. Given the current modal share, our results indicate that decision makers could play on both the individual and public health impact of modal choices to encourage citizens to reduce car usage.
Mobilair Project
Protocol of an Interdisciplinary and Multidimensional Assessment of Pollution Reduction Measures in Urban Areas: MobilAir Project, In: Buchholz W., Markandya A., Rübbelke D., Vögele S. (eds) Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policy. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham, 2020, with S. Mathy, H. Bouscasse, S. Chardonnel, A. Chalabaëv, S. Gabet and R. Slama