https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.062
Possible use of wine wastes containing ethanol as carbon and energy source for sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) growth and activity in the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) is studied for the first time. The experiments were performed using anaerobic down-flow packed bed reactors in semi-continuous systems. The performance of two bioreactors fed with wine wastes or ethanol as carbon sources is compared in terms of sulphate reduction, metals removal and neutralization. The results show that efficient neutralization and high sulphate removal (>90%) were attained with the use of wine wastes as substrate allowing the production of effluents with concentrations below the required local legislation for irrigation waters. This is only possible provided that the AMD and wine wastes are contacted with calcite tailing, a waste material that neutralizes and provides buffer capacity to the medium. The removal of metals using wine wastes as carbon source was 61–91% for Fe and 97% for both Zn and Cu. The lower removal of iron, when wine waste is used instead of ethanol, may be due to the presence of iron-chelating compounds in the waste, which prevent the formation of iron sulphide, and partial unavailability of sulphide because of re-oxidation to elemental sulphur. However, that did not affect significantly the quality of the effluent for irrigation. This work demonstrates that wine wastes are a potential alternative to traditional SRB substrates. This finding has direct implication to sustainable operation of SRB bioreactors for AMD treatment.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.013
The ability of two active bioremediation systems, based on the activity of sulphate-reducing bacteria, for the production of irrigation water from acid mine drainage (AMD), was compared. System I consisted of a packed bed reactor containing calcite tailing followed by an anaerobic packed bed bioreactor. System II consisted of a settler, fed with AMD and treated water recycle, and a sulphidogenic anaerobic packed bed bioreactor, fed with clarified settler effluent. Although efficient in terms of pH neutralisation and metals removal, system I did not allow continuous production of suitable irrigation water, since the concentration of sulphate in the effluent frequently exceeds the maximum recommended value by local legislation. On the other hand, in system II very high sulphate reduction (>99.0%) was achieved during the whole experiment, being the values in the effluent much lower than legislated limits for irrigation water. System II, not requiring the addition of any neutralising agent, can also be advantageous from an economical perspective.