During the research collaboration, how did you determine the authorship order? Did you have any experiences about inappropriate inclusion or lack of inclusion of co-authors? A: Normally, I will be the first author for my own work listed as the first and my advisor as the corresponding author listed at last. The most important collaborator is the second author and his or her PI is at the second last position. Other people will be in the middle. All my labmates will also be included not only because of useful discussion and help, more importantly we need to share one NMR equipment. As we could realize it, sharing to some degree wastes their time of doing measurements and they will do the same too.
Have you met any ethical dilemmas to report your experiment/simulation results in the manuscript? In your experience, what information should be included in the paper? A: I think this is a very interesting question because all publications only show the final results or the best results. You can never publish results with very bad conclusions or bad figures. It is possible that people read your perfect paper, however, the results may be picked from 100 trials.