review form

Paper X

Title of Manuscript:

Which category describes this manuscript?

q Practice/Application/Case

q Study/Experience Report

q Research/Technology

q Survey/Tutorial/How-To

q Other (please specify): ……………..

Are the title, the abstract and the introduction appropriate? Please comment.

Title Abstract Introduction

q Yes q Yes q Yes

q No q No q No

Explain:………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Discuss the contribution made by the manuscript:

Rate the paper in each of the following areas (1 = low ; 4 = high):

1 2 3 4

Technical content q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Business content q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

1 2 3 4

Originality of claim q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

Statements are exaggerated YES / NO

Explain …….………………………………………………………………………………….

Clarity and Organisation q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Writing style/Grammar q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

COMMENTS ON SCIENTIFIC REASONING

Rate the paper in each of the following areas (1 = low ; 4 = high):

Claim:

1 2 3 4

Well-formulated q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

All concepts are explained q q q q

Explain …………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Generic (1) vs. concrete (4) q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

Reasoning:

1 2 3 4

Well-structured q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………

1 2 3 4

Shallow (1) vs. profound q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Enough sound examples q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

Generic (1) vs. concrete (4) q q q q

Explain ……………………………

Conclusion:

1 2 3 4

Based on logical reasoning q q q q

Explain ……………………………………………………………………………………….

Contains new elements (1=yes, 4=no) q q q q

Explain …………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Does the manuscript contain sufficient and appropriate references? Please comment.

NO YES

Sufficient references q q q q

Explain ………………………………………………………………………………………..

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

References in conference style q q q q

Explain …………………………………………………………………………………….

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

References where appropriate q q q q

Explain …………………………………………………………………………………….

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Suggestions for improvement to the paper:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse