Integrative and Comparative Biology promotes research integrity and supports authors' rights
Below are links to resources on research integrity, author rights and obligations, and more
Using identical or near-identical text from other published sources, including the author's work, constitute plagiarism, and may result in rejection and . Text that constitutes plagiarism is particularly prone to appear in review papers and Methods sections. Please use plagiarism detection tools to avoid issues. Please contact the editor with questions about how to avoid plagiarism concerns before submission.
Violations may lead to the journal reporting authors to their institution's offices for research integrity.
Examples of self plagiarism: case study 1 and case study 2 provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Citation manipulation occurs when editors, reviewers, or collaborators pressure authors to include citations to boost citation rates of a journal or a scholar's work. Please report any concerns about possible citation manipulations to the ICB editor or the SICB president (see also case study below).
Citation stacking occurs when authors cite their own work or the work of their collaborators to boost citation rates. Violations may lead to the journal reporting authors to their institution's offices for research integrity.
Reference quality. Please check prior to submitting your manuscript, that none of the cited references have been retracted; do not cite retracted articles. Please ensure that the references cited in your manuscript in support of a particular fact do in fact contain a statement in support of this fact; do not rely on indirect evidence and secondary sources, such as AI-generated summaries or citations in other articles.
More information on
citation manipulation: article and case study provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
citation stacking: article provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
reference quality: case study provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Integrative and Comparative Biology will act on whistleblower reports of data and image manipulation. ICB's publisher Oxford University Press is supporting its journals by providing integrity tools and decision flow charts to help address concerns and detect misconduct.
Violations may lead to the journal reporting authors to their institution's offices for research integrity.
Examples of data manipulation: case study 1 and case study 2 provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Integrative and Comparative Biology strongly discourages the use of LLMs (large language model) AI tools to generate and edit text. All use of AI tools to generate or edit text must be disclosed and explained in the manuscript's acknowledgement section.
Please contact the editor in chief immediately (Editor.ICB@sicb.org).
Resources for appeals and complaints
suspected misconduct or unprofessional peer reviews
reviewer may have appropriated information from a manuscript (link to external information provided by COPE)
unfair rejection of the manuscript