Case Study 3: Reflections on Dolce & Gabbana advertising
“How to use this small stick shaped cutlery”
“Come and eat our great traditional Margherita pizza”
In 2018, the Dolce & Gabbana (D&G) "Chopsticks eating Spaghetti" advertising incident became a well-known negative example in intercultural communication research, exposing not only the brand’s cultural misstep but also broader ideological conflicts (Wei & Liu, 2021). The advertisement, which depicted Asian models awkwardly using chopsticks to eat Italian pasta, was criticized for reducing chopsticks to mere “small sticks” and ignoring their deep cultural significance in Chinese society. This incident, while largely viewed as a failure in intercultural communication, offers an opportunity for reflection on the ideological dynamics of global cultural exchanges. In many ways, this case highlights the importance of understanding and critically engaging with cultural symbols in the context of intercultural communication, and more broadly, how to promote positive, respectful exchanges while recognizing power dynamics.
From an intercultural communication perspective, the D&G incident illustrates the importance of cultural cognition and sensitivity. Chopsticks are not just utensils; they carry the philosophical values of balance, harmony, and respect for tradition (Wang, 2015; Anderson, 1988). By reducing chopsticks to a simplistic tool for eating pasta, the advertisement disregarded their historical and cultural weight. The playful tone and visual framing, particularly the overhead view of the models, conveyed an implicit message of Western cultural superiority, reinforcing what Said (1978) terms "Orientalism." This approach is problematic not only because it misrepresents Chinese culture but also because it perpetuates the ideological imbalance between Eastern and Western cultures in global communication.
However, in reflecting on the impact of this incident, it is crucial to move beyond merely criticizing the advertisement as a failure. It presents an opportunity to examine the ideological conflicts and power structures inherent in global cultural exchanges. The D&G case reflects how cultural symbols—like chopsticks—can be commodified and stripped of their rich cultural context to cater to Western tastes. This represents a form of cultural hegemony, where dominant cultural narratives define what is "advanced" or "civilized," while sidelining or trivializing other cultural traditions (Wei & Liu, 2021). This highlights a broader issue in intercultural communication: the need to understand the power structures at play in cultural representation, particularly when global brands are involved. As transnational corporations often hold the power to shape cultural narratives, the risk of reinforcing cultural stereotypes and perpetuating inequalities remains high.
While the D&G case is undeniably problematic, it also offers a valuable lesson for intercultural communication. To avoid such pitfalls, it is essential to foster a deeper understanding of cultural symbols and their ideological implications. Intercultural communication is not only about transmitting knowledge but also about recognizing and navigating the power relations that shape cultural exchanges. Effective intercultural understanding requires an awareness of the ideological forces behind cultural symbols and the ability to critically engage with them. When done correctly, intercultural exchanges can be transformative, allowing for mutual respect and appreciation.
In conclusion, the D&G advertisement serves as a case study that illustrates both the dangers of cultural misrepresentation and the potential for reflection and growth in intercultural communication. While the advertisement’s failure lies in its superficial treatment of Chinese culture, it offers an important opportunity to rethink how we engage with cultural symbols in global communication. By fostering awareness of the ideological dynamics involved, intercultural communication can move beyond stereotypes and promote more authentic, respectful exchanges. In this sense, the D&G incident, while negative, can still serve as a catalyst for positive change in the way cultures are represented and understood in the globalized world.