Ms. Kahn’s class is discussing whether or not Title IX has been effective in reducing inequities and disproportionate spending in boys’ and girls’ sports.

“My sister plays college basketball, and there wouldn’t even be a team, let alone adequate funding for uniforms and games, if it weren’t for Title IX,” says Marie.

“Yeah? Well, my brother is on the wrestling team at Central High,” says Alex, “and his team has to raise money for uniforms because they have to share half their resources and budget with girls! I mean, who ever heard of a girl wrestler?”

“That’s sexist! And totally old-school,” Ally responds. “Wrestling—and water polo, and boxing, and even race car driving—are serious sports with professional athletes, both male and female. Your brother’s attitude just illustrates why Title IX is still so important.”

“But I’ve heard on the news that Title IX just takes money away from boys’ and men’s sports,” counters Alex. “So there might be more girls playing, but that’s because there are fewer boys. That’s unfair!”

“Alex, you are making a claim that Title IX laws, in effect, reduce the number of boys participating in sports in favor of girls’ participation,” says Ms. Kahn, “but as a scientist you must remember that claims have to be supported with evidence.”

“I have some research data here that might help us decide if what Alex heard is true,” says Ms. Kahn. “We need to look at real evidence, not just opinions, to decide if there is inequity.”

Discussion Question:

Title IX became a law in 1972. After that, girls’ participation in sports increased dramatically. Many sports are played by both males and females. However, there are certain sports that are dominated by either males or females, not both. Do you think associating sports with a certain gender will ever end?