My Summer as a Structural Biologist
August 2026
A few years ago, I was teaching my first course in general biology in Denver Public Schools (Denver, CO). And, like most new teachers, I was searching for every resource I could find. I was reading through a fantastic curriculum, called “Intro to Cancer: Leukemia & Hina's Story". I was impressed by the extensive effort that had gone into the creation of a full suite of cancer and genetics curricula. After more digging I found out that Fred Hutch Cancer Center had a program to bring teachers on site for a summer research experience. Immediately, I thought that this would be a perfect opportunity for me.
Before starting my career in education, I had been a researcher at the University of Colorado Boulder, in the lab of Prof. Sean Shaheen working on organic upconverting nanoparticles. We had used these nanoparticles for multiphoton bioimaging, and I found the cross-section of biology and optics fascinating.
After a few years, I left research to pursue a career in secondary education, but I continued to look for ways to deepen my knowledge of science - add in an excuse to spend my summer break in beautiful Seattle - and this opportunity was exactly what I had been looking for. I was thrilled and honored to be accepted into the Hutch Teacher Fellowship program for two summers of research on campus.
Unfortunately, I had very little experience in life sciences or doing biochemistry research. Thus, I was nervous about finding a lab where I could be both useful and knowledgeable enough to make progress on a research project of my own. Given my background in optics and bioimaging, I figured I would be best suited in a lab that had something to do with the visualization of biological structures. When I was placed in the lab of Prof. Roland Strong, a noted structural biologist and molecular immunologist, it was the perfect fit.
Above: Michael Stark in his classroom. Photo provided by Michael Stark.
Below: The author, Michael Stark, prepares a protein sample for crystallization. Photo by Connor O'Shaughnessy, Fred Hutch Cancer Center.
Researchers in the Strong Lab use a variety of biochemical techniques to produce immunologically significant proteins with the eventual goal of determining their three-dimensional structures, typically through X-ray crystallography.
Determining the structure of these proteins allows us to make inferences about what will bind and interact with that protein as well as how those proteins fundamentally ‘work’. For example, if we wish to produce a cancer therapy that selectively binds to cancerous cells and minimizes off-target effects, we must first know what will bind to that cancer cell, and hopefully not bind to the healthy cells of the patient. To do this, structural biologists must determine exactly what those surface proteins look like.
Despite recent advances in microscope technology, even the most powerful light microscopes fail to obtain anywhere near the resolution needed to image something as small as a single protein. To the uninitiated, a protein is simply a chain made up of any combination of the 20 different amino acid molecules. Because any of these 20 amino acids can bond with one another, a protein can look and act extremely differently from another protein. Additionally, because of the extreme diversity of these amino acid sequences, predicting how a protein will fold into shape is immensely difficult. While computational methods like AlphaFold have radically increased the accuracy of predictions, modelling large, complex, multi-unit proteins still remains a challenge computationally. Because of this, if one requires an extremely high resolution depiction of a protein, they still must turn to X-ray crystallography.
In X-ray crystallography, one prepares a highly-ordered material which consists of repeating, identical copies of the protein of interest. This crystalline solid, when placed in an X-ray beam, will then diffract those incoming X-rays in a specific way, depending on the location of the atoms in that solid. The location of those diffracted X-rays can then be used, with great precision, to determine the structure of the protein in that diffracting crystal.
Dr. Roland Strong, Basic Science Division & Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Photo by Fred Hutch Cancer Center.
A polypeptide chain, a small section of a
protein, is made up of repeating bonds
between different amino acids.1
An X-ray crystallography experiment.
Figure made using BioRender.com2. Electron density map courtesy of PDBe4.
Buffers Line the Shelves
Different proteins do best in different buffer conditions. This means a crystallography lab has to keep a huge variety of buffers on hand at any time. Photo by Michael Stark.
Protein crystallization is a bit of a dark art. A crystallographer frequently attempts hundreds of different conditions before finding a ‘sweet spot’. Additionally, many crystallographers suggest leaving your trays undisturbed for lengthy periods of time before disposing of them, out of a hope that crystals might appear. Photo by Michael Stark.
Form Dictates Function
An HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) protein structure containing a peptide strand from the cancer-causing E7 protein of HPV (shown near the top in purple). This structure was determined by Strong Lab Staff Scientists Kathryn Finton & Peter Rupert. PDB ID: pdb_00007sr33
A typical protein expression and purification workflow (in bacteria).
Figure made using BioRender.com.5
Before one can begin an X-ray crystallography experiment one first needs some crystals to ‘shoot’. This all begins by obtaining a very pure and clean sample of one’s protein of interest. This protein is then placed in a compatible buffer, where the protein can be fully solvated, forming bonds between the protein and the solvent. From that point we can begin to attempt to coerce the protein into a crystalline configuration. However, this is often where the trouble begins.
If you ask any protein crystallographer about their work, most likely the first thing they will tell you is that it is a bit of a dark art. Or, the closest thing you can get to being a professional gambler while working in a lab, as one researcher described it to me. The reason for this is primarily because proteins require quite a bit of persuading to get them to crystallize. This involves getting the protein to forgo its favorable interactions between water molecules in the buffer solution and in exchange form billions of identical, repeating, contacts with one another. It is this formation of identical contacts that makes a crystal.
Each protein will crystallize best in vastly different environments, requiring a crystallographer to begin each experiment by attempting hundreds of different ‘conditions’ - what we call a specific mixture of different salts, buffers, and precipitating agents. Once the protein has gone through its initial screening, a crystallographer can begin to deduce some trends as to which conditions are helping the protein to crystallize. From that point, we attempt to grow larger, singular crystals, which are hopefully robust enough to be carefully picked up and placed in the X-ray beam path.
1. Crystallographers use an optical microscope like the one here to observe their crystals as they grow. Photo by Michael Stark.
2. I was ecstatic to see the first successful crystal growth tray after a few weeks of unsuccessful attempts. Unfortunately, these crystals are too small to use for an X-ray crystallography experiment.
Photos by Michael Stark.
3. This condition yielded lots of small crystals, but they are low quality -
known as ‘rod clusters’.
4. Finally! These crystals are fairly large and are separated from one another.
5. Crystals consisting of a protein studied for potential use in targeted radiotherapy. It is bound to a chemical known as a chelator, which bonds tightly to many metals. In this experiment it is bound to europium, which fluoresces pink under UV illumination.
In large part, I chose to participate in this work because I simply love science. To be able to peer into the atomic world and develop an understanding of the microscopic molecules which govern our body’s function is an incredible experience. As a science teacher so much of my mission is to spread my love of science to my students. Being able to be back in a research lab, learning new techniques and concepts, was exactly what I needed to maintain this passion for science, and I hope I can pass it on to my students.
As teachers, we can easily forget that what we are teaching is new to our students. With this ‘expert lens’ we detach ourselves from what it feels like to struggle with new concepts. After years in our field, the sense of confusion that can overwhelm a learner can begin to feel foreign to us. Being back in a laboratory, in a field so distinct from my own previous one, was an excellent opportunity to be reminded of this feeling. I feel that this experience will allow me more empathy for what my students go through. It's also an important reminder - for myself and for them - that real learning often happens in this temporarily uncomfortable space.
Acknowledgements
I’d like to give a special thank you to the people who made this experience so impactful. To Dr. Peter Rupert for his wonderful mentorship and patient teaching. To Sabriyah Moreshed for her instruction of lab techniques and many laughs. To Prof. Roland Strong for his motivating guidance and willingness to take on a keen new crystallographer. And, to the entire Strong Lab for their warm welcoming and support for bettering secondary science education.
1 Amino acids. National Human Genome Research Institute. Updated August 5, 2026. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Amino-Acids
2 “An X-ray crystallography experiment.” by M. Stark is adapted from “X-ray Crystallography” created in BioRender. (https://biorender.com) is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
3 Finton KAK, Rupert PB, Friend DJ, Dinca A, Lovelace ES, Buerger M, Rusnac DV, Foote-McNabb U, Chour W, Heath JR, Campbell JS, Pierce RH and Strong RK (2023) Effects of HLA single chain trimer design on peptide presentation and stability. Front. Immunol. 14:1170462. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1170462
4 Kleywegt G. PDBe brings electron-density viewing to the masses. Protein Data Bank in Europe. January 9, 2017. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/news/pdbe-brings-electron-density-viewing-masses
5 “Protein Purification for Crystallography Experiments” by M. Stark is adapted from “Protein Overexpression and Purification from Bacteria” created in BioRender. (https://biorender.com) is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Photo Credits
Photos by Michael Stark and Courtesy of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center/Strong Lab. Additional photos by Connor O'Shaughnessy, Fred Hutch Cancer Center.
Michael Stark teaches AP Physics and Biology at Thomas Jefferson High School, Denver Public Schools (Denver, Colorado).