I am an Assistant Professor of Economics at the Graduate School of Economics at the University of Tokyo.
Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania (2021).
Field: Macroeconomics and Finance
Contact: hlee [at] e.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Winner of the Best Paper Award for Early Career Academics at Econometric Society Australasia Meeting 2022
Winner of the Hiram C. Haney Fellowship Award in Economics
Winner of the Thomas J. Sargent Dissertation Fellowship at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
I theoretically and quantitatively show that the cross-sectional ranking of the interest-elasticities of investment between large and small firms is counterfactually flipped in the models with fixed and convex adjustment costs. Then, I develop a heterogeneous-firm real business cycle model where the semi-elasticities of large and small firms’ investments are matched with the empirical estimates. In the model, following a negative TFP shock, the timings of large firms’ lumpy investments are significantly synchronized due to the low elasticity to the general equilibrium effect. After a surge of large firms’ lumpy investments, TFP-induced recessions are especially severe, and the semi-elasticity of the aggregate investment drops significantly.
Job market paper version: link
The Risk-Premium Channel of Uncertainty: Implications for Unemployment and Inflation (with Lukas B. Freund and Pontus Rendahl)
- Revise & Resubmit at Review of Economic Dynamics
This paper studies the role of macroeconomic uncertainty in a search-and-matching framework with risk-averse households. Heightened uncertainty about future productivity reduces current economic activity even in the absence of nominal rigidities. A risk-premium mechanism accounts for this result. As future asset prices become more volatile and covary more positively with aggregate consumption, the risk premium rises in the present. The associated downward pressure on current asset values lowers firm entry, making it harder for workers to find jobs and reducing supply. With nominal rigidities the recession is exacerbated, as a more uncertain future reinforces households’ precautionary behavior, which causes demand to contract. Counterfactual analyses using a calibrated model imply that unemployment would rise by less than half as much absent the risk-premium channel. The presence of this mechanism implies that uncertainty shocks are less deflationary than regular demand shocks, nor can they be fully neutralized by monetary policy.
This paper studies how the pass-through businesses of top income earners affect the aggregate fluctuations in the U.S. economy. I develop a heterogeneous-household real business cycle model with endogenous labor supply and occupational choice and calibrate the model to capture the observed top income inequality. Compared to the counterfactual economy with the factor-income-driven top income inequality, the economy in the baseline model features the aggregate fluctuations that outperform in explaining the recent changes in the business cycle: 1) lower volatility of aggregate output and 2) stronger negative correlation between labor hour and productivity. Heterogeneous labor demand sensitivities to TFP shocks between pass-through businesses and C-corporations build the core of the aggregate dynamics, and the aggregate employment dynamics display substantial nonlinearity due to this heterogeneity.
This paper develops and tests a novel algorithm that solves heterogeneous agent models with aggregate uncertainty. The algorithm is based on the ergodic theorem: if a simulated path of the aggregate shock is long enough, all the possible aggregate allocations are realized, which allows to fully recover rationally expected future outcomes at each point on the path. This method solves the nonlinear dynamic stochastic general equilibrium globally with a high degree of accuracy. Furthermore, the market-clearing prices and the expected aggregate states are directly computed at each point on the path without relying on a parametric law of motion. Using the algorithm, I analyze a heterogeneous-firm business cycle model where firms are subject to an external financing cost and hoard cash as a buffer stock. In the model, due to the missing general equilibrium effect on cash, the aggregate fluctuations in cash and consumption feature significant nonlinearity and state dependence. Based on the model, I discuss the business cycle implications of the corporate cash holdings.
Since 1996, the number of listed firms in the U.S. has decreased by around 50%. Using U.S. Compustat and earnings surprises from I/B/E/S data, we document that the financial reports of listed firms required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) regulation have become significantly less transparent over the same period. To theoretically and quantitatively analyze these secular trends, we develop a heterogenous-firm equilibrium model where the endogenous choice to go public or private and the distribution of the firm-level allocations are characterized by closed-form solutions. In the model, each listed firm’s publicly disclosed intangible is diffused to other firms’ productivity as an externality. In the estimated model, the increased intangible share has substantially decreased the average transparency of the financial disclosure and the number of listed firms. This leads to significant losses in welfare and productivity due to reduced technology diffusion. Finally, we characterize a policy maker’s dilemma between maximizing welfare and productivity. According to the estimation, the recent stricter SEC disclosure requirement has significantly mitigated the welfare cost induced by rising intangibles at the cost of productivity loss.
We study whether the infrastructure investment is beneficial by quantifying the public infrastructure investment multipliers. We build a heterogeneous firm general equilibrium model to provide a micro-foundation for the multipliers with firms' investment decisions. We estimate our general equilibrium model that informs us about the elasticity of substitution between public capital and private capital. We find that private capital is a gross substitute for public capital at the firm level, while it is a gross complement of public capital at the state level. In addition, we illustrate that the multipliers are substantially different across financing methods such as lump-sum payments and corporate taxation. Heavier corporate taxation leads to dampened fiscal multipliers as firms' investment is crowded out. This crowding out of private investments is shown to be dominantly driven by the increase in the interest rate and the wage.